<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with spying and Iraq</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/spying+Iraq</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'spying' and 'Iraq' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Who&apos;s Soft on Terrorism?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65397/Whos%2DSoft%2Don%2DTerrorism</link>
		<description> Who&apos;s soft on terrorism?  Surely not the Democrats, who are about to enable the National Security Agency to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/washington/09nsa.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;extend its secret domestic wiretapping program&lt;/a&gt; after saying otherwise for months.  Surely not the Republican White House, determined to rush out a new Osama bin Laden video &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/08/AR2007100801817.html?hpid=topnews&quot;&gt;even if it burns an intelligence connection spying on Al Qaeda&lt;/a&gt; that has been carefully cultivated for years.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65397</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Osama</category>
		<category>OsamabinLaden</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>SITE</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Harry Taylor, US Citizen of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50704/Harry%2DTaylor%2DUS%2DCitizen%2Dof%2Dthe%2DDay</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.buzznet.com/video/recent/play/9039/"&gt;Man tells President Bush that he should be ashamed of himself.&lt;/a&gt; Bushie has been touring the country talking to the people and the people have been talking back. Today he met with his toughest and most elequent angry citizen, one Mr. Harry Taylor who began with this salvo: &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;

Q: You never stop talking about freedom, and I appreciate that. But while I listen to you talk about freedom, I see you assert your right to tap my telephone, to arrest me and hold me without charges, to try to preclude me from breathing clean air and drinking clean water and eating safe food. If I were a woman, you&apos;d like to restrict my opportunity to make a choice and decision about whether I can abort a pregnancy on my own behalf. You are -- &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;

THE PRESIDENT: I&apos;m not your favorite guy. Go ahead. (Laughter and applause.) Go on, what&apos;s your question?  (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060406-3.html&quot;&gt;full transcript here&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50704</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:24:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>carolina</category>
		<category>domestic</category>
		<category>harry</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>north</category>
		<category>shame</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>taylor</category>
		<dc:creator>tsarfan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>On Policy Discussions in a Never-Ending War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47744/On%2DPolicy%2DDiscussions%2Din%2Da%2DNeverEnding%2DWar</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10536559/site/newsweek/&gt;I learned this week&lt;/a&gt; that on December 6, Bush summoned Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller to the Oval Office in a futile attempt to talk them out of running &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?hp&amp;ex=1134795600&amp;en=c7596fe0d4798785&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage&quot;&gt;the story&lt;/a&gt;...&quot; President Bush &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; did not want journalists to reveal his NSA spying program against Americans [discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47642&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]  And in yesterday&apos;s rare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/12/20/america/web.2012.conferencetext.php&quot;&gt;press conference&lt;/a&gt;, the President said: &quot;An open debate about law would say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what we&apos;re going to do.&apos; And this is an enemy which adjusts... Any public hearings on programs will say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what they do. Adjust.&apos; This is a war.&quot; Neocon guru William Kristol &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901027.html&quot;&gt;argues&lt;/a&gt; that talk of Bush being an &quot;imperial&quot; president&quot; is &quot;demagogic&quot; and &quot;irresponsible&quot; since &quot;Congress has the right and the ability to judge whether President Bush has in fact used his executive discretion soundly.&quot;  What is the role of &quot;open debate&quot; in a war against terror that may last for decades?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47744</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Kristol</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Times</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Coming down the pub after the General Assembly, Clare?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31421/Coming%2Ddown%2Dthe%2Dpub%2Dafter%2Dthe%2DGeneral%2DAssembly%2DClare</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1156694,00.html"&gt;And then Kofi said &apos;no way!&apos; and Clare said &apos;way!&apos; and...&lt;/a&gt; British agents bugged conversations of Kofi Annan in the run-up to the Iraq War. Former Minister Clare Short (who&apos;s made some wild claims in the past but presumably wouldn&apos;t state something of this magnitude without being sure) read some of transcripts and &apos;presumes&apos; that this is all legal...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31421</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:04:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bugging</category>
		<category>clareshort</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>kofiannan</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<dc:creator>humuhumu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


