<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ssl</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ssl</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ssl' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:44:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:44:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Of course I want gimmicks, I&apos;m a record producer!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82484/Of%2Dcourse%2DI%2Dwant%2Dgimmicks%2DIm%2Da%2Drecord%2Dproducer</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.recordproduction.com/right-track-studios.html"&gt;DVDs to save the music industry&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(video interview)&lt;/small&gt; Record Producers discuss illegal downloads, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.recordproduction.com/mike-oldfield-video.html&quot;&gt;home&lt;/a&gt; studios and why 5.1 DVD sound just might be the future. And more - a further 180 interviews on the same site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.recordproduction.com/producers_and_engineers_videos.htm&quot;&gt;Producers&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.recordproduction.com/usa_studios.htm&quot;&gt;Studios&lt;/a&gt;. 
These vary in size and quality, from large video files, to small audio streams for anyone still on a dial-up connection. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82484</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:44:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DVD</category>
		<category>LoudnessWar</category>
		<category>MixingBoards</category>
		<category>PlasticHallwayWhereThievesandPimpsRunFree</category>
		<category>proTools</category>
		<category>Quadraphonic</category>
		<category>ReelToReel</category>
		<category>SolidStateLogic</category>
		<category>SSL</category>
		<category>Tape</category>
		<category>Vinyl</category>
		<dc:creator>Lanark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Middler</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74461/The%2DMiddler</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.softpedia.com/news/Gmail-Accounts-Automatic-Hacking-Tool-Presented-at-Defcon-91747.shtml&quot;&gt;Your 
Gmail account isn&apos;t secure&lt;/a&gt;. Announced at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-16/dc-16-speakers.html#Beale&quot;&gt;Defcon 
16&lt;/a&gt;, Jay Beale&apos;s tool, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intelguardians.com/themiddler.html&quot;&gt;The 
Middler&lt;/a&gt; (man-in-the-middle) to steal session ID from not only Gmail users, 
but LinkedIn, LiveJournal, Facebook, and presumably any site that uses a session-based 
cookie. &lt;a href=&quot;http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=74765&amp;topic=13262&quot;&gt;Enable 
https permanently&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/96295/Facebook-a-privacy-problem-Never-would-have-guessed&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74461</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:48:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gmailsecurity</category>
		<category>hacker</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>https</category>
		<category>SSL</category>
		<dc:creator>sluglicker</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>15 bits of crypto should be enough for anybody</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71730/15%2Dbits%2Dof%2Dcrypto%2Dshould%2Dbe%2Denough%2Dfor%2Danybody</link>
		<description> On May 13, security advisories published by &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2008/msg00152.html&quot;&gt;Debian&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-612-1&quot;&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; revealed that, for over a year, their OpenSSL libraries have had a major flaw in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographically_secure_pseudorandom_number_generator&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia: Cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator&quot;&gt;CSPRNG&lt;/a&gt;, which is used by &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_generation&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia: Key generation&quot;&gt;key generation&lt;/a&gt; functions in many widely-used applications, which caused the &quot;random&quot; numbers produced to be extremely predictable. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.rominet.net/2008/05/debianopenssl-debacle.html&quot;&gt;lolcat summary&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; How bad is it? It&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debian.org/security/key-rollover/&quot;&gt;pretty&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.debian.org/SSLkeys&quot;&gt;bad&lt;/a&gt;. Understand that these keys are used not only for encryption, but also for authentication. The keyspace has been reduced to a mere 32,768 possibilities, and you can already &lt;a href=&quot;http://metasploit.com/users/hdm/tools/debian-openssl/&quot;&gt;download them all&lt;/a&gt;, along with tools to use them. Worse still, in the days &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the issue became publicly known, there was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/attacks/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207603339&quot;&gt;noticeable&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://stats.denyhosts.net/stats.html&quot;&gt;spike&lt;/a&gt; in the number of brute-force attacks on SSH servers, indicating that there has already been significant exploitation of this vulnerability.

Partial timeline of events: In May 2006, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363516&quot;&gt;a bug&lt;/a&gt; led to &lt;a href=&quot;http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.devel/10917&quot;&gt;a question&lt;/a&gt; which led to &lt;a href=&quot;http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-openssl/openssl/trunk/rand/md_rand.c?rev=141&amp;r1=140&amp;r2=141&quot;&gt;the fateful patch&lt;/a&gt; being applied to &lt;a href=&quot;http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-openssl/openssl/trunk/rand/md_rand.c?rev=141&amp;view=markup&quot;&gt;md_rand.c&lt;/a&gt; (in Debian&apos;s &quot;unstable&quot; development branch). In April 2007, Debian 4.0 &quot;etch&quot; and Ubuntu 7.04 were both released, which was the beginning of the inclusion of the buggy version of OpenSSL in officially-released distributions. The bug remained unfixed through the releases of Ubuntu 7.10 and 8.04. On May 7, 2008, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-openssl/openssl/trunk/crypto/rand/md_rand.c?rev=300&amp;view=diff&amp;r1=300&amp;r2=299&quot;&gt;patch to fix the problem&lt;/a&gt; was committed to Debian&apos;s source repository, and on May 13 the issue was officially disclosed and updated packages were made available to users. (The patch&apos;s availability days before public disclosure of the bug appears to be a violation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-bug-security-confidentiality&quot;&gt;Debian&apos;s policy&lt;/a&gt;.)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.drinsama.de/erich/en/linux/2008051401-debian-openssl-desaster.html&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.drinsama.de/erich/en/linux/2008051401-consequences-of-sslssh-weakness.html&quot;&gt;are&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://changelog.complete.org/posts/714-Thoughtfulness-on-the-OpenSSL-bug.html&quot;&gt;some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/14/too-similar-to-be-different/&quot;&gt;responses&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://algebraicthunk.net/~dburrows/blog/entry/worst-ever/&quot;&gt;from&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advogato.org/person/branden/diary/5.html&quot;&gt;Debian&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.steve.org.uk/i_still_don_t_know_why_i_m_here.html&quot;&gt;blogs&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.links.org/?p=327&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.links.org/?p=328&quot;&gt;from&lt;/a&gt; an OpenSSL developer. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71730</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:01:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crypto</category>
		<category>cryptography</category>
		<category>debian</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>numbers</category>
		<category>owie</category>
		<category>prng</category>
		<category>probability</category>
		<category>random</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>ssh</category>
		<category>ssl</category>
		<category>ubuntu</category>
		<dc:creator>finite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cesar Millan Ain&apos;t Got Nothin&apos; On Me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69463/Cesar%2DMillan%2DAint%2DGot%2DNothin%2DOn%2DMe</link>
		<description> What do a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nomoreabandonedcarts.com/Bio.aspx&quot;&gt;balding man with a unique talent&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/theasunshine/231134292/&quot;&gt;shopping carts&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisignsecured.com/ssl.aspx&quot;&gt;Extended Validation SSL Certificates&lt;/a&gt; have in common?  Well, this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCorYsc82Lk&quot;&gt;Liberty Fillmore: The Cart Whisperer&lt;/a&gt; (YT).  Won&apos;t you think of the carts and visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nomoreabandonedcarts.com/&quot;&gt;No More Abandoned Carts&lt;/a&gt; today?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69463</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:04:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cart</category>
		<category>fillmore</category>
		<category>liberty</category>
		<category>ssl</category>
		<category>verisign</category>
		<category>viral</category>
		<category>whisperer</category>
		<dc:creator>schleppo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7204/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eudora.com"&gt;Eudora Releases 5.1...&lt;/a&gt; an incremental release is seldom worth a post, but with 5.1 comes support for SSL! Which makes me very happy: our SysAdmin banned us from hooking up to our mail server until we had an e-mail client that was A) SSL-enabled and B) not a product of Microsoft... finally! I can get my corporate e-mail without having it forwarded to my Yahoo! e-mail account!  : )  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7204</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:50:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>eudora</category>
		<category>mirosoft</category>
		<category>ssl</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>silusGROK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


