<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with stanleyfish</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/stanleyfish</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'stanleyfish' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:09:52 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Paradise Lost in Translation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77010/Paradise%2DLost%2Din%2DTranslation</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/paradise-lost-in-prose/"&gt;A new &apos;prose translation&apos;&lt;/a&gt; of Milton&apos;s classic poem has been written by &lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/ddaniels/index.html&quot;&gt;Prof Dennis Danielson&lt;/a&gt; in an effort to help make it available to a wider audience, if they find the original language too difficult.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paradiselost.org/index-2.html&quot;&gt;Apparently &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0963962132/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;he wasn&apos;t&lt;/a&gt; the first to &lt;a href=&quot;http://aramedia.com/voltronparadise.htm&quot;&gt;think&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/156389792X/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;of it&lt;/a&gt;, but considers his a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mynightstand.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;translation&lt;/a&gt; rather than a retelling, and it is printed as a dual edition / parallel text. &lt;small&gt;so, useful pedagogical tool, or evidence that we&apos;re forgetting how to read?&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77010</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:09:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>danielson</category>
		<category>dennisdanielson</category>
		<category>fish</category>
		<category>milton</category>
		<category>paradiselost</category>
		<category>stanleyfish</category>
		<category>translation</category>
		<dc:creator>mdn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Devoid of content&quot; -- and loving it.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42429/Devoid%2Dof%2Dcontent%2Dand%2Dloving%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/31/opinion/31fish.html?ex=1275192000&amp;amp;en=5b9064f5bb67f352&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;According to Stanley Fish&lt;/a&gt; ,  &quot;Students can&apos;t write clean English sentences because they are not being taught what sentences are.&quot; The solution: make them invent their own language.

After a generation that privileged content to the exclusion of form, is the pendulum swinging back the other way?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42429</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 16:30:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>english</category>
		<category>grammar</category>
		<category>inventedlanguages</category>
		<category>stanleyfish</category>
		<category>students</category>
		<category>teaching</category>
		<dc:creator>myl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17463/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://chronicle.com/jobs/2002/05/2002052401c.htm"&gt;Something about Shooting Stanley Fish in a Barrel&lt;/a&gt; Once, when asked by a student how he can get away with his famously unsourced assertions and oddly malicious personal attacks, Stanley Fish replied, &quot;Because I&apos;m Stanley Fish, and you&apos;re not.&quot; Which he defends by claiming that his actions derive from his theoretical work, mostly on the subjective nature of authority (albeit in a literary sense, but then who&apos;s to argue). 

So it&apos;s a little odd that in this article he attacks journalists - whom, other than a few anonymous beat reporters and David Brooks (who is a columnist and commentator, but hardly an objectivity-seeking reporter), he groups as &quot;they&quot; - for being less than fair to academics. Don&apos;t get too riled up, though; this is likely just Fish&apos;s latest attempt to bait a controversy and stick his name at the top.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17463</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 07:36:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>StanleyFish</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


