<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with statistics and trends</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/statistics+trends</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'statistics' and 'trends' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:01:35 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:01:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Does your son&apos;s name end with the letter &quot;n&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81679/Does%2Dyour%2Dsons%2Dname%2Dend%2Dwith%2Dthe%2Dletter%2Dn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2009/05/where_all_boys.html"&gt;Andrew Gelman recently posted this strange trend in baby naming&lt;/a&gt; originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.babynamewizard.com/archives/2007/7/where-all-boys-end-up-nowadays&quot;&gt;Laura Wattenberg&apos;s blog in 2007&lt;/a&gt;.  Why do so many boys&apos; names now end with the letter &quot;n&quot;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81679</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:01:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>babynames</category>
		<category>babynaming</category>
		<category>gelman</category>
		<category>graphs</category>
		<category>n</category>
		<category>names</category>
		<category>naming</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>stats</category>
		<category>trends</category>
		<category>wattenberg</category>
		<dc:creator>srs</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wikirank</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80311/Wikirank</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wikirank.com/"&gt;Wikirank&lt;/a&gt; is an analytical tool that measures the popularity of trending topics on wikipedia. You can compare up to four topics and generate nifty embeddable graphs.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80311</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:39:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>graphing</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>trends</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
		<category>wikirank</category>
		<category>zeitgeist</category>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8836/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html"&gt;Google Zeitgeist&lt;/a&gt; charts the popularity of certain search queries on Google &lt;FONT SIZE=&quot;-2&quot;&gt;(via &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://slashdot.org/articles/01/07/06/1140259.shtml&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/FONT&gt;. Of course, it&apos;d be more interesting to track your own keywords, and &lt;I&gt;you can&lt;/I&gt;.  I stumbled across this partially hidden Google feature last night. &lt;FONT SIZE=&quot;-2&quot;&gt;(More inside...)&lt;/FONT&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8836</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 08:29:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>tracking</category>
		<category>trends</category>
		<category>zeitgeist</category>
		<dc:creator>waxpancake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3861/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info/"&gt;Too Much Information?&lt;/a&gt; Heavy information overload: the world&apos;s total yearly production of print, film, optical, and magnetic content would require roughly 1.5 billion gigabytes of storage. This is the equivalent of 250 megabytes per person for each man, woman, and child on earth.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3861</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 23:59:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>information</category>
		<category>overload</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>storage</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>trends</category>
		<dc:creator>faithnomore</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


