<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with stemcells and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/stemcells+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'stemcells' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:41:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:41:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>just ANOTHER reason why Bush is a soulless bastard.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53117/just%2DANOTHER%2Dreason%2Dwhy%2DBush%2Dis%2Da%2Dsoulless%2Dbastard</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0000014/2006/07/19.html#a1068"&gt;Bush&apos;s threat to veto stem cell funding is a joke.&lt;/a&gt; Scott Rosenberg says flat out why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/20/politics/main696810.shtml&quot;&gt; Bush&apos;s threat&lt;/a&gt; is shamelessly amoral and hyporcritical, and purely political in nature. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2006/07/19/bushs_threat_to_veto.html&quot;&gt;(via)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53117</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:41:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>hypocrisy</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>stupidity</category>
		<dc:creator>Doorstop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No stem cell research</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31988/No%2Dstem%2Dcell%2Dresearch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/03/25/stem_cells/index.html"&gt;Thou shalt not make scientific progress.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Medical research is poised to make a quantum leap that will benefit sufferers from Alzheimer&apos;s, Parkinson&apos;s, muscular dystrophy, diabetes and other diseases. But George W. Bush&apos;s religious convictions stand in its way.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31988</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:17:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>cells</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>medecine</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>progess</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>stem</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stem Cells</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29287/Stem%2DCells</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2090527/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;A case study in modern Washington dishonesty.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Michael Kinsley responds to Bush&apos;s former chief domestic policy adviser&apos;s &lt;a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38364-2003Oct29.html&gt;reply&lt;/a&gt; to Kinsley&apos;s &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/29143&gt;recent article&lt;/a&gt; on Bush&apos;s stem cell policy. [Via &lt;a href=http://www.fark.com/&gt;Fark&lt;/a&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29287</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:03:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Logical Coherence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29143/Logical%2DCoherence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2090244/#ContinueArticle"&gt;Morality and Logical Coherence&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;A case in point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;If stem-cell research is morally questionable, the procedures used in fertility clinics are worse. You cannot logically outlaw the one and praise the other. And surely logical coherence is a measure of moral sincerity.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;And failing that test would be a measure of what?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29143</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:40:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>embryos</category>
		<category>fertility</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


