<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with subsidies</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/subsidies</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'subsidies' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:02:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:02:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Adding up US subsidies for auto travel with and without the costs of war</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65210/Adding%2Dup%2DUS%2Dsubsidies%2Dfor%2Dauto%2Dtravel%2Dwith%2Dand%2Dwithout%2Dthe%2Dcosts%2Dof%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/09/20/delucchi-study-finds-that-us-motorists-do-not-pay-their-way/"&gt;In the U.S., motorists do not pay their way.&lt;/a&gt; The US government spends more on highways and other auto-related expenses than it receives from auto-related taxes, unlike almost every country in Europe. In a recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=1088%20&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[pdf], &lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/delucchi/index.php&quot;&gt;Mark Delucchi&lt;/a&gt; calculates automobile-related costs and revenues in three different ways and concludes the subsidy is around 20-70 cents per gallon or $24-105 billion in 2002.  But what are automobile-related costs, you ask? Largely tucked away in footnotes and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2005/UCD-ITS-RR-96-03(07)_rev2.pdf&quot;&gt;background papers&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[pdf]&lt;/small&gt; are his careful considerations about which expenditures to include and what portion of costs relate directly to automobile oil use, for everything from the highway patrol, to fighting brushfires, to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, to military activity in the Middle East.  Don&apos;t miss Report #15, in which Delucchi and coauthor James Murphy seek to calculate: &#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2004/UCD-ITS-RR-96-03(15)_rev2.pdf&quot;&gt;If the U.S. transportation sector did not use oil, how much would the U.S. federal government reduce its military commitment in the Persian Gulf?&lt;/a&gt;&#8221; &lt;small&gt;[pdf]&lt;/small&gt; (especially Table 15-12, which summarizes much of the paper). &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Iraq+oil&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;] [originally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/27369&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65210</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:02:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>gastax</category>
		<category>highways</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>jamesmurphy</category>
		<category>markdelucchi</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>roads</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<category>transit</category>
		<category>transportation</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>salvia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>farm subsidies good?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53330/farm%2Dsubsidies%2Dgood</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/daniel_davies/2006/07/dumping_dumping.html"&gt;Africa does not need more expensive food.&lt;/a&gt; As the Doha trade rounds &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/24/business/trade.php&quot;&gt;collapse&lt;/a&gt; largely due to disagreements about farm subsidies, Daniel Davies challenges &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0506-09.htm&quot;&gt;the conventional view that farm subsidies hurt the poor&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53330</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:22:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>development</category>
		<category>doha</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<category>trade</category>
		<dc:creator>afu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cash on the Scarecrow, Pork on the Plow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41288/Cash%2Don%2Dthe%2DScarecrow%2DPork%2Don%2Dthe%2DPlow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2005/04/cash_on_the_sca.shtml"&gt;Cash on the Scarecrow, Pork on the Plow&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/br&gt;Matt Welch, using data from Environmental Working Group, examines the largesse of subsidies to Mellencamps.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41288</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:38:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>agriculture</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>farmsubsidies</category>
		<category>governmentwaste</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<dc:creator>trharlan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mohair, Yourhair</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22696/Mohair%2DYourhair</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mohairusa.com/"&gt;The Mohair Council of America &lt;/a&gt; wins the prize for our country&apos;s most unique lobbying group. (I mean, really - it&apos;s mohair!) The MCA exists largely to protect the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenscissors.org/agriculture/mohair.htm&quot;&gt;mohair subsidies&lt;/a&gt;, which are leftover from a time when the military used the material for uniforms. The subsidies were phased out in the mid 90s, but the MCA lobbied hard enough to bring them back in 1999. It just goes to show that with a well-placed lobbying arm, even the most useless, obscure interest group can get a piece of the government pie.

(Runner up: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flexpack.org/&quot;&gt;The Flexible Packaging Association&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22696</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 17:31:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>lobbying</category>
		<category>mohair</category>
		<category>packaging</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13233/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63034-2001Dec18.html"&gt;Farm Subsidy Web Site Sows Discord: &lt;/a&gt; &quot;Suppose you could go to a Web site, type in the names of co-workers--or maybe your boss--and find out how much money they make. Be honest--you would. And farmers, it seems, are no less curious than the rest of us. Since its public debut on Nov. 6, a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://ewg.org/&quot;&gt;Internet-accessible database &lt;/a&gt;that ranks farmers by name according to the amount of federal subsidies they receive has recorded 10.1 million searches. The payments often constitute the bulk of farmers&apos; income, and many of the hits have been by farmers eager to know how they compare with the guy growing corn or soybeans down the road.&quot; &lt;i&gt;(Washington Post story, which C-SPAN pointed me to.)&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13233</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 06:31:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>farmers</category>
		<category>farmsubsidy</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<dc:creator>Carol Anne</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5829/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=FT3SJRUJ4JC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;tagid=IXLC078IH7C&amp;amp;Collid=Any"&gt;Republicans plan energy bill&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Legislation to be introduced next week by the Senate energy committee chairman would pay billions of dollars in subsidies to the energy companies, which gave generously in last year&apos;s campaign.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxpayer.net/TCS/Press%20Releases/2-9-01ENERGY.htm&quot;&gt;More here.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5829</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:06:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>companies</category>
		<category>corporate</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


