<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sunnis</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sunnis</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sunnis' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:08:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:08:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Sunni Awakening</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81790/The%2DSunni%2DAwakening</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/05/iraqi-insurgents200905"&gt;Heads in the Sand.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The so-called Sunni Awakening, in which American forces formed tactical alliances with local sheikhs, has been credited with dampening the insurgency in much of Iraq. But new evidence suggests that the Sunnis were offering the same deal as early as 2004&#8212;one that was eagerly embraced by commanders on the ground, but rejected out of hand at the highest levels of the Bush administration.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81790</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:08:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>SunniAwakening</category>
		<category>Sunnis</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Peter W. Galbraith on the new Iraqi constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45127/Peter%2DW%2DGalbraith%2Don%2Dthe%2Dnew%2DIraqi%2Dconstitution</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18297"&gt;Last Chance for Iraq&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/authors/10454&quot;&gt;Peter W. Galbraith&lt;/a&gt;, writing in the New York Review of Books, on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-iraq.org/government/TAL.html&quot;&gt;new Iraqi constitution&lt;/a&gt;. He compares it to a peace treaty between three warring parties. &lt;small&gt;Previous threads: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43578&quot;&gt;Bush&apos;s Islamic Republic&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/35747&quot;&gt;The Bungled Transition&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/32728&quot;&gt;How to Get Out of Iraq&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;small&gt;Underneath an Islamic veneer, Iraq&apos;s new constitution ratifies the division of Iraq into three disparate entities: Kurdistan in the north, an Iranian-influenced Islamic state in the south, and, in the center, a Sunni region that has no clear political identity, but that with luck and concerted diplomacy could be governed by a new generation of Sunni Arab leaders. The constitution provides a basis for resolving Iraq&apos;s most contentious issues: oil, territory, and the competition to be the dominant power in Baghdad. If these issues are not addressed, they could set off a widespread civil war. ... The constitution has many flaws, but it provides a peace plan that might work, and it is therefore the most positive political development in Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein from power.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45127</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:24:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>kurds</category>
		<category>shiites</category>
		<category>sunnis</category>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


