<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with supremecourt and sex</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/supremecourt+sex</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'supremecourt' and 'sex' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:20:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:20:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Swingers Clubs ruled legal in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47794/Swingers%2DClubs%2Druled%2Dlegal%2Din%2DCanada</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=1135205412524&amp;amp;call_pageid=968332188492&amp;amp;col=968793972154"&gt;Newsfilter: Sex Clubs OK in Canada&lt;/a&gt; ruled the Supreme Court yesterday in a 7-2 decision that drastically alters the definition of indecency in this country. What will be the results of this far-reaching change? Will &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20051222/SWINGERS22/TPNational/Canada&apos;&gt;gay bathhouses and marijuana growing&lt;/a&gt; be affected? Will there be &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=cfafe135-d41e-4d29-88a9-ae727ded02e6&amp;k=55301&apos;&gt;anti-social behaviour?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;&quot;Now harm, rather than community standards, is the key yardstick that will be used to measure the point at which constitutional freedoms can be limited&quot;.&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47794</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:20:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>indecency</category>
		<category>lifestyle</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>swingers</category>
		<category>swingersclubs</category>
		<dc:creator>stinkycheese</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>free at las</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46417/free%2Dat%2Dlas</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://maledei.de/blog/2005/11/04/gay-teen-matthew-limon-denied-freedom/#comments"&gt;&#8220;Matthew Limon, the gay man at the center of a Kansas law struck down by the state Supreme Court, was freed late Thursday night, but his ordeal may not be over.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46417</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:48:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>Kansas</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MatthewLimon</category>
		<category>release</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sodomy</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>halekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>SCOTUS goes gay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26643/SCOTUS%2Dgoes%2Dgay</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=558&amp;amp;e=1&amp;amp;u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_sodomy"&gt;Supreme Court wisely rules that you can&apos;t legislate morality&lt;/a&gt; and that privacy between consenting adults is a-ok as the Texas  sodomy law (&lt;em&gt;that applies to homosexuals only&lt;/em&gt;) is struck down. Ruling invalidates &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/interactive/law/0306/sodomy.laws/frameset.exclude.html&quot;&gt;other remaining sodomy laws&lt;/a&gt; on the books. Dancing in the streets ensues. And as usual, Scalia gets to add his wisecracks in the dissent. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldsteinhowe.com/blog/archive/2003_06_22_SCOTUSblog.cfm#105663898602769716&quot;&gt;SCOTUSblog&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26643</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:00:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gays</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>SCOTUS</category>
		<category>SCOTUSblog</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<category>Sodomy</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider anti-homosexual laws</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22025/US%2DSupreme%2DCourt%2Dto%2Dreconsider%2Dantihomosexual%2Dlaws</link>
		<description> On September 17, 1998, in response to an armed robbery call, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/US/9811/20/texas.sodomy/&quot;&gt;Houston police burst in to the home of John Lawrence&lt;/a&gt;.  The police didn&#8217;t find a robber (nor would they &#8211; the call was deliberately false), but they did find Lawrence having sex with another man, Tyrone Garner.  Lawrence and Garner were promptly charged with &#8220;engaging in homosexual conduct,&#8221; a misdemeanor under Texas law.  They paid their fine and began a long legal challenge to Texas&#8217; anti-sodomy law.  That challenge has finally reached the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court, which &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/news/s/20021202/courtsodomydc.html&quot;&gt;today agreed to hear their appeal early next year&lt;/a&gt;.  Standing in the way is the Court&#8217;s own 1986 decision in &lt;i&gt;Bowers v. Hardwick&lt;/i&gt;, in which it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/bowers.html&quot;&gt;held that anti-sodomy laws are constitutional&lt;/a&gt;.  That may be about to change.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22025</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antisodomylaw</category>
		<category>appeal</category>
		<category>bowersvhardwick</category>
		<category>BrettLigon</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>consensualsex</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>Houston</category>
		<category>johnlawrence</category>
		<category>lambdalegaldefense</category>
		<category>LambdaLegalDefenseandEducationFund</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<category>sodomy</category>
		<category>sodomylaws</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>SuzanneGoldberg</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<category>tyronegarner</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>ussupremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>pardonyou?</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


