<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with supremecourt and ussupremecourt</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/supremecourt+ussupremecourt</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'supremecourt' and 'ussupremecourt' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:09:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:09:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s bad, long-term, if people identify the rule of law with how individual justices vote.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57815/%3FI%2Dthink%2Dit%3Fs%2Dbad%2Dlongterm%2Dif%2Dpeople%2Didentify%2Dthe%2Drule%2Dof%2Dlaw%2Dwith%2Dhow%2Dindividual%2Djustices%2Dvote%3F</link>
		<description> Chief Justice John Roberts, decrying &#8220;the personalization of judicial politics,&#8221; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200701/john-roberts&quot;&gt;describes his efforts&lt;/a&gt; to increase comity on the Supreme Court and to decide more cases unanimously.  In Roberts&apos; first term as chief justice, &#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=21648&quot;&gt;while a relatively large number of the Court&#8217;s decisions&lt;/a&gt;&#8221; were unanimous, &#8220;several important, closely divided cases&#8221; were decided by 5-4 votes, with Roberts joining the more conservative justices.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57815</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:09:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>johnroberts</category>
		<category>justiceroberts</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>roberts</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>ussupremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>ibmcginty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider anti-homosexual laws</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22025/US%2DSupreme%2DCourt%2Dto%2Dreconsider%2Dantihomosexual%2Dlaws</link>
		<description> On September 17, 1998, in response to an armed robbery call, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/US/9811/20/texas.sodomy/&quot;&gt;Houston police burst in to the home of John Lawrence&lt;/a&gt;.  The police didn&#8217;t find a robber (nor would they &#8211; the call was deliberately false), but they did find Lawrence having sex with another man, Tyrone Garner.  Lawrence and Garner were promptly charged with &#8220;engaging in homosexual conduct,&#8221; a misdemeanor under Texas law.  They paid their fine and began a long legal challenge to Texas&#8217; anti-sodomy law.  That challenge has finally reached the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court, which &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/news/s/20021202/courtsodomydc.html&quot;&gt;today agreed to hear their appeal early next year&lt;/a&gt;.  Standing in the way is the Court&#8217;s own 1986 decision in &lt;i&gt;Bowers v. Hardwick&lt;/i&gt;, in which it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/bowers.html&quot;&gt;held that anti-sodomy laws are constitutional&lt;/a&gt;.  That may be about to change.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22025</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antisodomylaw</category>
		<category>appeal</category>
		<category>bowersvhardwick</category>
		<category>BrettLigon</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>consensualsex</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>Houston</category>
		<category>johnlawrence</category>
		<category>lambdalegaldefense</category>
		<category>LambdaLegalDefenseandEducationFund</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<category>sodomy</category>
		<category>sodomylaws</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>SuzanneGoldberg</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<category>tyronegarner</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>ussupremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>pardonyou?</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15095/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0226/p01s02-usju.html"&gt;In a small Ohio town, a fight over the right to knock on doors&lt;/a&gt; You are a Supreme Court Justice. How would you rule on this case?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15095</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 06:49:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anonymity</category>
		<category>ChristianScienceMonitor</category>
		<category>CSM</category>
		<category>FreeSpeech</category>
		<category>JehovasWitnesses</category>
		<category>LocalOrdinance</category>
		<category>OH</category>
		<category>Ohio</category>
		<category>proselytizing</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>RightToPrivacy</category>
		<category>solicitation</category>
		<category>StrattonOhio</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USSupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4763/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com"&gt;Bush, by a technicality.&lt;/a&gt; They&apos;ve run out the clock. Oh dear. This could be messy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4763</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>uselections</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<category>ussupremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


