<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with surveillance and Intelligence</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/surveillance+Intelligence</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'surveillance' and 'Intelligence' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Pinwale</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82540/Pinwale</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html"&gt;NSA E-Mail Surveillance Renews Concerns in Congress.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Since April, when it was disclosed that the intercepts of some private communications of Americans went beyond legal limits in late 2008 and early 2009, several Congressional committees have been investigating. Those inquiries have led to concerns in Congress about the agency&#8217;s ability to collect and read domestic e-mail messages of Americans on a widespread basis, officials said. Supporting that conclusion is the account of a former N.S.A. analyst who, in a series of interviews, described being trained in 2005 for a program in which the agency routinely examined large volumes of Americans&#8217; e-mail messages without court warrants. Two intelligence officials confirmed that the program was still in operation.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82540</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Decision on FISA delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73045/Decision%2Don%2DFISA%2Ddelayed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/housing-bill-fisa-delayed-until-after-july-recess-2008-06-26.html"&gt;Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) delayed.&lt;/a&gt; Senator Dodd &lt;a href=&quot;http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/4476&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;This bill does not say, &apos;Trust the American people;  Trust the courts and judges and juries to come to just decisions.&apos; Retroactive immunity sends a message that is crystal clear: &apos;Trust me.&apos;&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/rospars/gGxsZF&quot;&gt;Obama talks about why he supports the bill.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; may vote after the Fourth of July recess. &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/72648/Telecom-Amnesty-Bill-Tomorrow&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73045</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:01:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Dodd</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>immunity</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>joannemerriam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tell &apos;em Uncle Alberto Says It&apos;s Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49848/Tell%2Dem%2DUncle%2DAlberto%2DSays%2DIts%2DCool</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/08/gop_senators_refuse_eavesdropping_inquiry/"&gt;&apos;The committee is, to put it bluntly, basically under the control of the White House,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; said Jay Rockefeller, vice-president of the Senate Intelligence Committee, after the committee quashed a broad inquiry into the legality of the NSA spying on Americans -- despite an increasing number of legal scholars &lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/03/nsa-eavesdropping-and-fourth-amendment.php&quot;&gt;coming forward&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constitutionproject.org/article.cfm?messageID=145&quot;&gt;declaring&lt;/a&gt; that the program is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_hr/022806koh.html&quot;&gt;&quot;blatantly illegal,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; in the words of Yale Law School dean Harold Koh. Meanwhile, the GOP proposes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/eavesdropping/&quot;&gt;giving spying on Americans the &quot;force of law&quot;&lt;/a&gt; while subjecting it to &quot;rigorous oversight.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49848</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>checksandbalances</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>SenateSelectCommitteeonIntelligence</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FBI Papers Indicate Intelligence Violations</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46110/FBI%2DPapers%2DIndicate%2DIntelligence%2DViolations</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/23/AR2005102301352_pf.html"&gt;FBI Papers Indicate Intelligence Violations&lt;/a&gt; ...Records turned over as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit also indicate that the FBI has investigated hundreds of potential violations related to its use of secret surveillance operations, which have been stepped up dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but are largely hidden from public view...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46110</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>freedomofinformation</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20625/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/0210/artifact.shtml"&gt;&quot;Suppose you&apos;re devising a logo for a new wing of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,&lt;/a&gt; an office charged with developing intelligence tools and integrating the government&apos;s existing surveillance networks. Suppose that it has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Paranoid.htm&quot;&gt;vaguely sinister&lt;/a&gt; name&#8212;say, the Information Awareness Office&#8212;and that it&apos;s to be run by a former Iran-contra conspirator. What would your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/0210/iaologo.gif&quot;&gt;design&lt;/a&gt; be?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20625</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 19:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>informationawareness</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<dc:creator>zztzed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10240/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46816,00.html"&gt;Terrorism&apos;s first win? Bye-Bye crypto.&lt;/a&gt; The rubble is still burning and the Republicans are ready to strip of our right to use crypto products.  Opportunists feeding off fear.  That&apos;s how you win at the terrorist game.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10240</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:05:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>backdoors</category>
		<category>crypto</category>
		<category>cryptography</category>
		<category>decryption</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>RightToPrivacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9529/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/national/010818/653833.html"&gt;Another benefit of globalization: Third World-style political oppression right here at home.&lt;/a&gt; From the Ottawa Citizen (of all places): &quot;Officers from various police forces and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service have infiltrated, spied on or closely monitored organizations that are simply exercising their legal right to assembly and free speech. Targets of such intelligence operations in recent years... [include] a senior citizens&apos; satire group that sings about social injustice... Individuals have been arrested for handing out literature condemning police tactics... &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9529</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:37:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigbrother</category>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>CSIS</category>
		<category>dissent</category>
		<category>globalization</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>Ottawa</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>policestate</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


