<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with surveillance and email</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/surveillance+email</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'surveillance' and 'email' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Pinwale</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82540/Pinwale</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17nsa.html"&gt;NSA E-Mail Surveillance Renews Concerns in Congress.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Since April, when it was disclosed that the intercepts of some private communications of Americans went beyond legal limits in late 2008 and early 2009, several Congressional committees have been investigating. Those inquiries have led to concerns in Congress about the agency&#8217;s ability to collect and read domestic e-mail messages of Americans on a widespread basis, officials said. Supporting that conclusion is the account of a former N.S.A. analyst who, in a series of interviews, described being trained in 2005 for a program in which the agency routinely examined large volumes of Americans&#8217; e-mail messages without court warrants. Two intelligence officials confirmed that the program was still in operation.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82540</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush&apos;s executive order allowing some warrantless eavesdropping on those inside the United States &amp;#0173;...&amp;#0173; is based on classified legal opinions...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47642/Bushs%2Dexecutive%2Dorder%2Dallowing%2Dsome%2Dwarrantless%2Deavesdropping%2Don%2Dthose%2Dinside%2Dthe%2DUnited%2DStates%2D01730173%2Dis%2Dbased%2Don%2Dclassified%2Dlegal%2Dopinions</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/15/politics/15cnd-program.html"&gt;&quot;The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; What&apos;s the article about? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsa.gov/&quot;&gt;NSA,&lt;/a&gt; and you, if you&apos;ve ever called internationally or sent email overseas: &lt;i&gt;...the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible &quot;dirty numbers&quot; linked to Al Qaeda, ...&lt;/i&gt; (very long, NYT--and the NSA&apos;s mission is to spy only on communications abroad)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47642</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:31:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cointelpro</category>
		<category>domestic</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>phone</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17453/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=513&amp;amp;ncid=513&amp;amp;e=3&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020528/ap_on_go_ot/fbi_terror_e_mails_9"&gt;No Carnivore? No Osama evidence&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The FBI destroyed evidence gathered in an investigation involving bin Laden&apos;s network after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/carnivore/carnivore.htm&quot;&gt;its e-mail wiretap system&lt;/a&gt; mistakenly captured information to which the agency was not entitled.
The FBI technical person was apparently so upset that he destroyed all the e-mail take, including the take on&quot; the suspect, the memo said&quot;.
Another example of &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20020528/ap_on_go_ot/fbi_reorganizing_2&quot;&gt;the need for significant FBI reform&lt;/a&gt;?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17453</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 16:19:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alQaeda</category>
		<category>binLaden</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Carnivore</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8231/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pidp.ewc.hawaii.edu/pireport/2001/June/06-11-01.htm"&gt;Echelon rumored to be used in NZ spying on Fiji&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/7983&quot;&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt;, as seen on TV, is suggested to monitor gobzillions of electronic communications. People are starting to wonder if New Zealand used Echelon to monitor the progress of the May 2000 coup and hostage taking in Fiji, in addition to the tradition undercover operations. Memorable quotation: &quot;It is not a question of if others are spying on Fiji but of who, how and, to a much lesser extent, why.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8231</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:06:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>coup</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>Fiji</category>
		<category>NewZealand</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7983/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1357000/1357264.stm"&gt;ALL YOUR EMAIL ARE BELONG TO US!&lt;/a&gt; How serious is this threat?  What precautions do you routinely take?  What precautions do you think you *should* be taking?  What viable options do we have today, for those of us who aren&apos;t computer programmers by profession?  And how secure are they, anyway?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7983</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 09:56:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>echelon</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2486/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20000713.html"&gt;It is time for Louis Freeh to lose his job.&lt;/a&gt; Carnivore, indeed.  This has got to stop.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2486</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:05:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carnivore</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


