<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with surveillance and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/surveillance+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'surveillance' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:11:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:11:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;more than two centuries of surveillance in America&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57994/more%2Dthan%2Dtwo%2Dcenturies%2Dof%2Dsurveillance%2Din%2DAmerica</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.trackedinamerica.org/"&gt;Tracked In America&lt;/a&gt; --&lt;i&gt;the stories of 25 individuals who have been targeted by the U.S. government. The stories span from World War I to the post-9/11 world.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57994</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:11:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Americans</category>
		<category>citizens</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Connectedness, Betweenness, Closeness???</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54995/Connectedness%2DBetweenness%2DCloseness</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/509207014e0ac010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html"&gt;Big Brother 101&lt;/a&gt; -- Could your social networks brand you an enemy of the state? (Popular Science Mag)  And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/e3dbfcd7f22ac010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html&quot;&gt;one staffer finds out it might&lt;/a&gt;--due to a connection to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_six&quot;&gt;Buffalo Six&lt;/a&gt;. Think 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon, but with tapping and surveillance and worse at the other end.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54995</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>networks</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>social</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>suspicion</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>National Security Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48043/National%2DSecurity%2DAgency</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=bhp5pgplqim9m?tname=national-security-agency&amp;amp;method=6&amp;amp;sbid=lc03a"&gt;National Security Agency&lt;/a&gt; What is it that NSA does?  What are or were its legal parameters  and its history? This is  a quick &quot;NSA 101&quot; course that might be helpful as stories continue to emerge about the agency. Oddly, as large as this organization is,  it has been very much in the background, and only recently when some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/05/05/ale05065.htm &quot;&gt; whistleblowers&lt;/a&gt; spoke up, has this agency  gained a good deal of public attention. Some of you may recall the fuss raised about some spy agency named &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EcheloN&quot;&gt;Echelon&lt;/a&gt; and wonder how  this group is or is not connected to NSA.  And soon at least one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060104-114052-6606r.htm&quot;&gt;whistle blower will testify&lt;/a&gt; before congress, though the White House seems to have convinced some 50% of Americans that the president can do whatever he wants in time of war, ignoring legal constraints  upon intel branches. And that raises the question (for me): if NSA can skirt the courts to &quot;fight terror,&quot; then what of the FBI, also once requied to have court approval for phone taps. Are they too now free to do as they want in this &quot;fight against terror&quot;?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48043</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:48:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>nationalsecurity</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush&apos;s executive order allowing some warrantless eavesdropping on those inside the United States &amp;#0173;...&amp;#0173; is based on classified legal opinions...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47642/Bushs%2Dexecutive%2Dorder%2Dallowing%2Dsome%2Dwarrantless%2Deavesdropping%2Don%2Dthose%2Dinside%2Dthe%2DUnited%2DStates%2D01730173%2Dis%2Dbased%2Don%2Dclassified%2Dlegal%2Dopinions</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/15/politics/15cnd-program.html"&gt;&quot;The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; What&apos;s the article about? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsa.gov/&quot;&gt;NSA,&lt;/a&gt; and you, if you&apos;ve ever called internationally or sent email overseas: &lt;i&gt;...the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible &quot;dirty numbers&quot; linked to Al Qaeda, ...&lt;/i&gt; (very long, NYT--and the NSA&apos;s mission is to spy only on communications abroad)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47642</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:31:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cointelpro</category>
		<category>domestic</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>phone</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20625/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/0210/artifact.shtml"&gt;&quot;Suppose you&apos;re devising a logo for a new wing of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,&lt;/a&gt; an office charged with developing intelligence tools and integrating the government&apos;s existing surveillance networks. Suppose that it has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Paranoid.htm&quot;&gt;vaguely sinister&lt;/a&gt; name&#8212;say, the Information Awareness Office&#8212;and that it&apos;s to be run by a former Iran-contra conspirator. What would your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/0210/iaologo.gif&quot;&gt;design&lt;/a&gt; be?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20625</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 19:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>informationawareness</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<dc:creator>zztzed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17337/</link>
		<description> Does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,52739,00.html&quot;&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt; have a place in society anymore?  Or is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacy.org/&quot;&gt;incompatible&lt;/a&gt; with a crowded and technologically-advanced world?  If we must submit to constant surveillance, who should we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/02.06.97/cover/brin1-9706.html&quot;&gt;trust to watch&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17337</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2002 09:23:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10332/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46852,00.html"&gt;48 hours of wiretap without a court order?&lt;/a&gt; Sure, according to the Senate. Carnivore installations on the rise and the recent call to control crypto software are exactly what we don&apos;t need.  This is probably just the beginning.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10332</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:54:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Carnivore</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


