<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with taxes and Wealth</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/taxes+Wealth</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'taxes' and 'Wealth' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:35:28 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:35:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Economic Consequences</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66651/Economic%2DConsequences</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/bush200712"&gt;The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The next president will have to deal with yet another crippling legacy of George W. Bush: the economy. A Nobel laureate, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/index.cfm&quot;&gt;Joseph E. Stiglitz&lt;/a&gt;, sees a generation-long struggle to recoup.&quot;  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firedoglake.com/&quot;&gt;Firedoglake&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66651</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:35:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Defense</category>
		<category>Economy</category>
		<category>Education</category>
		<category>Healthcare</category>
		<category>Infrastructure</category>
		<category>Money</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Poverty</category>
		<category>Spending</category>
		<category>Stiglitz</category>
		<category>Surplus</category>
		<category>TaxCuts</category>
		<category>Taxes</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>Wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Treasury: Income Mobility Substantial. Pew: But Not Enough.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66515/Treasury%2DIncome%2DMobility%2DSubstantial%2DPew%2DBut%2DNot%2DEnough</link>
		<description> A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treasury.gov/press/releases/reports/incomemobilitystudyfinal.pdf&quot;&gt;new U.S. Treasury Report&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treasury.gov/press/releases/hp673.htm&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;) reports that tax returns from 1996 to 2005 show that income mobility in the U.S. is &quot;considerable,&quot; with rising earnings, and top earners who often stumble. The WSJ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010855&quot;&gt;crows&lt;/a&gt;. Pew releases its own research (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economicmobility.org/&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewtrusts.org/news_room_ektid31110.aspx&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;) on income inequality today with a multi-decade outlook, but summarizes the findings as that American families&apos; income mobility is still highly dependent on their parents&apos; position.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2007/11/13/afx4332835.html&quot;&gt;Forbes&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2007/11/13/half-full-or-half-empty.aspx&quot;&gt;The New Republic blog&lt;/a&gt; try to reconcile the reports. Meanwhile, blacks appear to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119492563733591022.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news&quot;&gt;downwardly mobile&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:22:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>income</category>
		<category>incomeinequality</category>
		<category>inequality</category>
		<category>mobility</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>shivohum</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>$11.5 Trillion Lost In Bermuda Triangle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41793/115%2DTrillion%2DLost%2DIn%2DBermuda%2DTriangle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.acsblog.org/economic-regulation-employment-1311-super-rich-hide-115-trillion-in-tax-free-havens.html"&gt;$11.5 &lt;u&gt;Trillion&lt;/u&gt; Lost In Bermuda Triangle&lt;/a&gt; In case you&apos;ve ever wondered just how much money the mega rich keep nice and tax free in off shore shelters, it&apos;s $11.5 trillion.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41793</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 08:36:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>banking</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>offshore</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>expriest</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tax Havens, Millionaires&apos; Hell-holes and Escaping</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21949/Tax%2DHavens%2DMillionaires%2DHellholes%2Dand%2DEscaping</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old&amp;amp;section=current&amp;amp;issue=2002-11-30&amp;amp;id=2550"&gt;Millionaires&apos; Havens, Heavens And Hell Holes:&lt;/a&gt; Ghastly, depressing &lt;a href=&quot;http://consulting-unlimited.com/sky/monaco_report.htm&quot;&gt;Monaco&lt;/a&gt; comes in for a deserved drubbing from Philip Delves Broughton in this week&apos;s &lt;b&gt;Spectator&lt;/b&gt;. The idea of billionaires surfing the Web looking for a hide-out makes me giggle and gag, but it appears poor people can play too.  Have a look at (free!) e-zine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escapeartist.com/efan/efan1.htm&quot;&gt;Escape From America&lt;/a&gt;; run your index finger down &lt;a href=&quot;http://consulting-unlimited.com/sky/reports.htm&quot;&gt;a list &lt;/a&gt;of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escapeartist.com/taxhavens/taxhavens.htm&quot;&gt;tax havens &lt;/a&gt;and choose the &lt;strike&gt;paradise&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lectlaw.com/filesh/bbg30.htm&quot;&gt;place&lt;/a&gt; you&apos;d scarper off to, if your money problems, whether from excess or lack of money, ever become too [&lt;small&gt;sorry...&lt;/small&gt;] taxing.  
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21949</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:34:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Monaco</category>
		<category>Offshore</category>
		<category>overseas</category>
		<category>Spectator</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>TaxHavens</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16212/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020409/ap_on_bi_ge/taxes_who_pays_4&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;I&apos;m curious,&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t this exactly opposite of what we&apos;re being told?  I&apos;m always hearing the wealthy are benefitting somehow from GWB&apos;s new tax plan.  I&apos;m certainly no-where near the top 5%, and now I don&apos;t want to be.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16212</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:01:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>the_0ne</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


