<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with taxes and economics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/taxes+economics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'taxes' and 'economics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>You must be THIS TALL to file a W-2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82735/You%2Dmust%2Dbe%2DTHIS%2DTALL%2Dto%2Dfile%2Da%2DW2</link>
		<description> Economists Matthew Weinzierl (HBS) and Gregory Mankiw (Harvard) make a utilitarian case for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3651&quot;&gt;height tax&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;&quot;Our research shows that, according to a conventional utilitarian calculus, the optimal height levy is sizeable. We calculate optimal taxes for adult white males in the US, whom we divide into three height groups &#8211; tall (above 72 inches), medium (between 70 and 72 inches), and short (below 70 inches). The optimal average tax on the tall is about 7.1% of the average tall income, while the average tax on the medium is about 3.8% of average medium income. These taxes pay for an average transfer to the short of more than 13% of average short income. Expressed in a more tangible way&#8230; [a] tall person making $50,000 should pay about $4,500 more in taxes than a short person making the same income.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82735</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>hbs</category>
		<category>height</category>
		<category>modestproposal</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>utilitarianism</category>
		<dc:creator>Kadin2048</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Too tall!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67480/Too%2Dtall</link>
		<description> Moreover, based on the empirical distribution of height and wages, the optimal height tax is substantial: a tall person earning $50,000 should pay about $4,500 more in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/mankiw/files/Optimal_Taxation_of_Height.pdf&quot;&gt;taxes&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) than a short person earning the same income.  Draw what inferences &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/magazine/09heighttax.html?ex=1354856400&amp;en=7219befbfb8f6bfd&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;you will&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67480</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>height</category>
		<category>optimal</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>utilitarian</category>
		<dc:creator>Pants!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Treasury: Income Mobility Substantial. Pew: But Not Enough.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66515/Treasury%2DIncome%2DMobility%2DSubstantial%2DPew%2DBut%2DNot%2DEnough</link>
		<description> A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treasury.gov/press/releases/reports/incomemobilitystudyfinal.pdf&quot;&gt;new U.S. Treasury Report&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treasury.gov/press/releases/hp673.htm&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;) reports that tax returns from 1996 to 2005 show that income mobility in the U.S. is &quot;considerable,&quot; with rising earnings, and top earners who often stumble. The WSJ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010855&quot;&gt;crows&lt;/a&gt;. Pew releases its own research (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economicmobility.org/&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewtrusts.org/news_room_ektid31110.aspx&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;) on income inequality today with a multi-decade outlook, but summarizes the findings as that American families&apos; income mobility is still highly dependent on their parents&apos; position.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2007/11/13/afx4332835.html&quot;&gt;Forbes&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2007/11/13/half-full-or-half-empty.aspx&quot;&gt;The New Republic blog&lt;/a&gt; try to reconcile the reports. Meanwhile, blacks appear to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119492563733591022.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news&quot;&gt;downwardly mobile&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:22:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>income</category>
		<category>incomeinequality</category>
		<category>inequality</category>
		<category>mobility</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>shivohum</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Economics of Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59779/The%2DEconomics%2Dof%2DFat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=976484"&gt;Cheap Donuts and Expensive Broccoli: the Effect of Relative Prices on Obesity.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for the period 1982-1996, we find that individual BMI measures, as well as the likelihood of being overweight or obese, exhibit a statistically significant positive correlation with the prices of healthful relative to unhealthful foods.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59779</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:10:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bmi</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>monju_bosatsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>If you drive a car, I&apos;ll tax the...gas?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55797/If%2Dyou%2Ddrive%2Da%2Dcar%2DIll%2Dtax%2Dthegas</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13231593"&gt;Thomas Friedman:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;The First Law of Petropolitics, in short, argues that the price of oil and the pace of freedom operate in an inverse correlation. As the price of oil goes up in what I call petroauthoritarian states&#8212;like Iran, Sudan, Venezuela&#8212;the pace of freedom goes down. These regimes can afford to be less responsive to their people and outside pressure. And as the price of oil goes down, the pace of freedom goes up because these regimes have to open up to the world if they want to deliver for their people, and they have to empower their people more.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But how to lower oil prices and help freedom on its proverbial march? Many, from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/08/business/yourmoney/08view.html?ex=1317960000&amp;en=3a749625ac447e79&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;Alan Greenspan&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040419-610080,00.html&quot;&gt;Andrew Sullivan&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cartalk.com/content/features/gastax/index.html&quot;&gt;Ray Magliozzi from Car Talk&lt;/a&gt; think the answer may be to . . . &lt;a href=&quot;http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/10/pigou-club-manifesto.html&quot;&gt;raise the gas tax?&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/09/rogoff-joins-pigou-club.html&quot;&gt;Pigou Club&lt;/a&gt; is an ever-updated list of economists, politicians and others who have advocated Pigouvian (or is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=216407&quot;&gt;Pigovian?&lt;/a&gt;) taxes to not only lower oil prices, but reduce greenhouse gases, fix the federal deficit and strengthen our national security. Though some remain more than a little hesitant to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=b4672582-cb0e-4561-a59b-f1d8d95a468e&amp;p=2&quot;&gt;jump on the bandwagon&lt;/a&gt; and others &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/17/AR2006101701327.html&quot;&gt;remain skeptical&lt;/a&gt; that the movement is anything more than &quot;just talk,&quot; this could be an idea whose time has come, especially since the gas tax &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=226832&quot;&gt;isn&apos;t as regressive one would think&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55797</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:32:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>gas</category>
		<category>gastax</category>
		<category>pigou</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>joshuaconner</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Turncoats in Bermuda shorts.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24255/Turncoats%2Din%2DBermuda%2Dshorts</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/huffington/2003/03/12/tax_havens/&quot;&gt;Turncoats in Bermuda shorts&lt;/a&gt;. Arianna Huffington continues to skewer offshore tax shelters in her latest Salon opinion piece.  Despite her patriot-speak denouncing these corporations for avoiding taxes while our young men are getting ready to die for their country, she does shine the light on a growing problem &#8211; &#8220;basic fairness and economic justice&#8221; &#8211; or, the lack of it. How can the average American not be outraged at this, when so many of us are expected to be able to account for even the smallest charitable donation we would dare to use as a tax write-off?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24255</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:15:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ariannahuffington</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>offshorebanking</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>taxshelters</category>
		<dc:creator>archimago</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush Cited Non-Existent eport</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23816/Bush%2DCited%2DNonExistent%2Deport</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/printedition/ny-e3142018feb23,0,2678986.story?coll=ny%2Dbusiness%2Dprint"&gt;Bush Cited Non-Existent eport&lt;/a&gt; There was only one problem with President George W. Bush&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030220.html&quot;&gt;claim&lt;/a&gt; Thursday that the nation&apos;s top economists forecast substantial economic growth if Congress passed the president&apos;s tax cut: The forecast with that conclusion doesn&apos;t exist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23816</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:19:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>orange swan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12690/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011128/pl/bush_budget_balance_dc_2.html"&gt;White House predicts budget deficits until 2005.&lt;/a&gt; Uh... cause of the war, not monster tax cuts to businesses and billionaires... yeah, that&apos;s the ticket!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12690</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>budgetdeficit</category>
		<category>deficit</category>
		<category>economicpolicy</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpusateri</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8435/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.techtv.com/money/businessnews/story/0,23008,3321033,00.html"&gt;Another problem with the alternative minimum tax.&lt;/a&gt; One of the problems with this tax was discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/7924&quot;&gt;back in May&lt;/a&gt; when it was realized that the AMT would substantially cut into the tax rebates of many. Now there is a new twist: People who did not cash out stock options before the downturn and are now sitting on a tax bill larger than all their assets combined.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8435</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amt</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>irs</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>Nothing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3621/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/10/09/MN3707.DTL"&gt;cisco and microsoft didn&apos;t pay federal taxes last year. &lt;/a&gt; it seems it has something to do with paying employee stock options instead....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3621</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2000 20:32:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cisco</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>irs</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>rebeccablood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


