<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with taxes and taxation</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/taxes+taxation</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'taxes' and 'taxation' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>You must be THIS TALL to file a W-2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82735/You%2Dmust%2Dbe%2DTHIS%2DTALL%2Dto%2Dfile%2Da%2DW2</link>
		<description> Economists Matthew Weinzierl (HBS) and Gregory Mankiw (Harvard) make a utilitarian case for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3651&quot;&gt;height tax&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;&quot;Our research shows that, according to a conventional utilitarian calculus, the optimal height levy is sizeable. We calculate optimal taxes for adult white males in the US, whom we divide into three height groups &#8211; tall (above 72 inches), medium (between 70 and 72 inches), and short (below 70 inches). The optimal average tax on the tall is about 7.1% of the average tall income, while the average tax on the medium is about 3.8% of average medium income. These taxes pay for an average transfer to the short of more than 13% of average short income. Expressed in a more tangible way&#8230; [a] tall person making $50,000 should pay about $4,500 more in taxes than a short person making the same income.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82735</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:16:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>hbs</category>
		<category>height</category>
		<category>modestproposal</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>utilitarianism</category>
		<dc:creator>Kadin2048</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Too tall!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67480/Too%2Dtall</link>
		<description> Moreover, based on the empirical distribution of height and wages, the optimal height tax is substantial: a tall person earning $50,000 should pay about $4,500 more in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/mankiw/files/Optimal_Taxation_of_Height.pdf&quot;&gt;taxes&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) than a short person earning the same income.  Draw what inferences &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/magazine/09heighttax.html?ex=1354856400&amp;en=7219befbfb8f6bfd&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;you will&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67480</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>height</category>
		<category>optimal</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>utilitarian</category>
		<dc:creator>Pants!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Economics of Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59779/The%2DEconomics%2Dof%2DFat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=976484"&gt;Cheap Donuts and Expensive Broccoli: the Effect of Relative Prices on Obesity.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for the period 1982-1996, we find that individual BMI measures, as well as the likelihood of being overweight or obese, exhibit a statistically significant positive correlation with the prices of healthful relative to unhealthful foods.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59779</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:10:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bmi</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>monju_bosatsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Drug Tax Stamps</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57779/Drug%2DTax%2DStamps</link>
		<description> Many people want to legalize, regulate, and tax marijuana and other drugs, however, few know that many &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6670&quot;&gt;U.S. states are content simply to tax&lt;/a&gt;. In fact, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p17.pdf&quot;&gt;even the federal government wants a share&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(middle of p. 89 of the PDF)&lt;/small&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysticstamp.com/spOfferDetail.asp?soID=82&quot;&gt;used tax stamps&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1937_Marihuana_Tax_Act&quot;&gt;early prohibition&lt;/a&gt;, but only the states have recently issued &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flyingbuffalo.com/stamps.htm&quot;&gt;issued&lt;/a&gt; cool &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.milwaukeephilatelic.org/HenakHome/DrugTax.htm&quot;&gt;stamps&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(be sure to click &quot;exhibit&quot;)&lt;/small&gt;. The point, of course, is not to actually tax the drugs, but to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?issue_date=01-10-2007&amp;ID=2005113751&quot;&gt;penalize the drug dealers for tax evasion&lt;/a&gt; as well as drug sales. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/5071256.html&quot;&gt;They have brought in some money, though&lt;/a&gt;. A few interesting state government pages: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ct.gov/drs/lib/drs/publications/pubsip/ip99(20.1).pdf&quot;&gt;Conecticut&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.revenue.state.ne.us/legal/regs/drugtax.htm&quot;&gt;Nebraska&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dor.state.nc.us/taxes/usub/substance.html&quot;&gt;North Carolina&lt;/a&gt; and their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dor.state.nc.us/downloads/BD-1.pdf&quot;&gt;tax return form&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ksrevenue.org/faqs-abcdrugtax.htm&quot;&gt;Kansas&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57779</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:55:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cannabis</category>
		<category>controlledsubstances</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>drugwar</category>
		<category>ganja</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<category>stamps</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>weed</category>
		<dc:creator>TheOnlyCoolTim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Inland Review letter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29887/Inland%2DReview%2Dletter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://b3ta.com/board/2409311"&gt;Apparently genuine reply to a letter sent to the Inland Revenue.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;I must take issue with your description of our last as a &quot;begging letter&quot;. It might perhaps more properly be referred to as a &quot;tax demand&quot;. This is how we, at the Inland Revenue have always, for reasons of accuracy, traditionally referred to such documents.&quot;  [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://orbyn.com/cult/&quot;&gt;Orbyn&lt;/a&gt;, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iamcal.com/&quot;&gt;Cal&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29887</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:27:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>b3ta</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>British</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>humour</category>
		<category>InlandRevenue</category>
		<category>letter</category>
		<category>mail</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The view is nice from the yacht</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26046/The%2Dview%2Dis%2Dnice%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2Dyacht</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/29/politics/29CHIL.html"&gt;The bait and switch.&lt;/a&gt; A last-minute revision by House and Senate leaders in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;c=StoryFT&amp;cid=1051390020618&amp;p=1012571727085&quot;&gt;tax bill&lt;/a&gt; that President Bush signed today will prevent millions of minimum-wage families from receiving the increased child credit that is in the measure.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26046</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>childcredit</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poverty</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>trickledown</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tax Havens, Millionaires&apos; Hell-holes and Escaping</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21949/Tax%2DHavens%2DMillionaires%2DHellholes%2Dand%2DEscaping</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old&amp;amp;section=current&amp;amp;issue=2002-11-30&amp;amp;id=2550"&gt;Millionaires&apos; Havens, Heavens And Hell Holes:&lt;/a&gt; Ghastly, depressing &lt;a href=&quot;http://consulting-unlimited.com/sky/monaco_report.htm&quot;&gt;Monaco&lt;/a&gt; comes in for a deserved drubbing from Philip Delves Broughton in this week&apos;s &lt;b&gt;Spectator&lt;/b&gt;. The idea of billionaires surfing the Web looking for a hide-out makes me giggle and gag, but it appears poor people can play too.  Have a look at (free!) e-zine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escapeartist.com/efan/efan1.htm&quot;&gt;Escape From America&lt;/a&gt;; run your index finger down &lt;a href=&quot;http://consulting-unlimited.com/sky/reports.htm&quot;&gt;a list &lt;/a&gt;of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escapeartist.com/taxhavens/taxhavens.htm&quot;&gt;tax havens &lt;/a&gt;and choose the &lt;strike&gt;paradise&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lectlaw.com/filesh/bbg30.htm&quot;&gt;place&lt;/a&gt; you&apos;d scarper off to, if your money problems, whether from excess or lack of money, ever become too [&lt;small&gt;sorry...&lt;/small&gt;] taxing.  
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21949</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:34:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Monaco</category>
		<category>Offshore</category>
		<category>overseas</category>
		<category>Spectator</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>TaxHavens</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19316/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/20/national/20LIBR.html?8hpib"&gt;Want to cut taxes? Eliminate libraries.&lt;/a&gt; NY Times story (yeah, yeah, reg required, sorry) talks about a ballot initiative in Stevens County, Washington that may totally eliminate its libraries.  (more inside...)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19316</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:05:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>libraries</category>
		<category>library</category>
		<category>referendum</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>PeteyStock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9675/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://msnbc.com/news/616631.asp#BODY"&gt;Oops. Where did the surplus go? &lt;/a&gt; It&apos; fascinating how MSNBC bends over backward to make it sound as if both parties shared blame equally rather then pointing straight at Bush&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/special/20010625chart.mhtml&quot;&gt;outrageous tax cut&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9675</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:05:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>MSNBC</category>
		<category>surplus</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>TaxCut</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USdeficit</category>
		<dc:creator>muckster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5699/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://tbtf.com/blog/2001-01-28.html#7"&gt;Proposed IRS rule could limit the freedom to link.&lt;/a&gt; The US Internal Revenue Service is proposing a rule that might make it inadvisable for not-for-profit organizations to provide links on their Web sites to &lt;b&gt;any political site&lt;/b&gt;. The IRS is proposing to interpret any link to a political site from the pages of a nonprofit as evidence that the nonprofit is &quot;engaging in political activity&quot; and thus in danger of losing its 503(c) status.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5699</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:30:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>503(c)</category>
		<category>activism</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>hyperlinks</category>
		<category>IRS</category>
		<category>linking</category>
		<category>links</category>
		<category>NFPs</category>
		<category>not-for-profits</category>
		<category>PAC</category>
		<category>PACs</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


