7 posts tagged with technology by rushmc.
Displaying 1 through 7 of 7.

Related tags:
+ (175)
+ (144)
+ (136)
+ (128)
+ (112)
+ (68)
+ (65)
+ (55)
+ (54)
+ (54)
+ (50)
+ (50)
+ (50)
+ (49)
+ (45)
+ (42)
+ (38)
+ (37)
+ (37)
+ (33)
+ (33)
+ (33)
+ (32)
+ (30)
+ (30)
+ (30)
+ (29)
+ (28)
+ (28)
+ (28)
+ (26)
+ (26)
+ (26)
+ (26)
+ (25)
+ (25)
+ (23)
+ (23)
+ (23)
+ (22)
+ (22)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (17)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)


Users that often use this tag:
Artw (103)
kliuless (50)
mathowie (32)
Blazecock Pileon (26)
homunculus (24)
zarq (22)
Steven Den Beste (19)
carter (17)
anathema (14)
Tlogmer (14)
Hackworth (11)
infini (11)
netbros (10)
baylink (10)
The Whelk (10)
Trurl (10)
crunchland (9)
nthdegx (9)
madamjujujive (9)
Brandon Blatcher (9)
Fizz (9)
tranquileye (8)
anastasiav (8)
stbalbach (8)
Miko (8)
Chinese Jet Pilot (8)
filthy light thief (8)
Joe Beese (8)
Egg Shen (8)
rushmc (7)
endquote (7)
loquacious (7)
Gyan (7)
Postroad (6)
skallas (6)
grant (6)
shivohum (6)
divabat (6)
rschram (5)
mediareport (5)
Mwongozi (5)
jonson (5)
Pretty_Generic (5)
StrikeTheViol (5)
nickyskye (4)
owillis (4)
grumblebee (4)
jeremias (4)
Kattullus (4)
blahblahblah (4)
tellurian (4)
goodnewsfortheinsane (4)
cenoxo (4)
gman (4)
PreacherTom (4)
Horace Rumpole (4)
Evernix (4)
vidur (4)
beisny (4)
CrazyUncleJoe (3)

The Postmodern Shoestring

The shoestring (string and shoe holes) was first invented in England in 1790. But there is nothing so simple that man cannot complicate, and so some calculate the optimal way to tie a shoe, some seek zen enlightenment through shoe-tying, and others craft Shoelace Parables to improve psychological health. Contrarians find their peace by eschewing the tying altogether.
posted by rushmc on Dec 4, 2002 - 11 comments

 

Are national governments about to take over the Internet? Has ICANN done such a terrible job that they should be permitted to?
posted by rushmc on Jun 13, 2002 - 3 comments

Does privacy have a place in society anymore? Or is it incompatible with a crowded and technologically-advanced world? If we must submit to constant surveillance, who should we trust to watch?
posted by rushmc on May 23, 2002 - 21 comments

WE ARE WATCHING YOU.

WE ARE WATCHING YOU. "The FBI added that its research is 'always mindful of constitutional, privacy and commercial equities,' and that its use of new technology can be challenged in court and in Congress." No really, go ahead, try and stop us if you don't like it. That's your (snicker, snicker) right.
posted by rushmc on Nov 24, 2001 - 12 comments

Desperate, clueless people scrambling to keep us safe?

Desperate, clueless people scrambling to keep us safe? Or cynical manipulation of public fear and superstition, keeping the pea hopping from shell to shell while the real machinations go on behind the scenes? Either way, the government seems to be doing their part to see that we don't forget that we're supposed to be terrorized.
posted by rushmc on Nov 10, 2001 - 16 comments

Next generation emoticons

Next generation emoticons or another step in tearing down cultural (and man-machine?) walls?
posted by rushmc on Sep 8, 2001 - 15 comments

THIS is a light saber?!?

THIS is a light saber?!? "There really isn't anything out there, other than a baton and pepper spray, that can halt a dangerous suspect without doing him or anyone else harm," Herr said.

Ouch.
posted by rushmc on Dec 4, 2000 - 28 comments

Page: 1