Join 3,497 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)

11 posts tagged with terrorism by tranquileye.
Displaying 1 through 11 of 11.

Related tags:
+ (139)
+ (135)
+ (122)
+ (115)
+ (111)
+ (104)
+ (78)
+ (73)
+ (70)
+ (68)
+ (64)
+ (63)
+ (63)
+ (61)
+ (61)
+ (54)
+ (52)
+ (51)
+ (51)
+ (46)
+ (46)
+ (43)
+ (43)
+ (42)
+ (41)
+ (36)
+ (33)
+ (31)
+ (31)
+ (29)
+ (29)
+ (27)
+ (25)
+ (24)
+ (24)
+ (23)
+ (22)
+ (22)
+ (22)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (20)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (17)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (14)


Users that often use this tag:
homunculus (85)
Postroad (31)
specialk420 (14)
y2karl (13)
the man of twists ... (13)
semmi (12)
tranquileye (11)
zarq (11)
skallas (9)
mr_crash_davis (9)
amberglow (9)
digaman (9)
owillis (8)
vidur (8)
nofundy (7)
troutfishing (7)
fold_and_mutilate (6)
aaron (6)
adamvasco (6)
hadjiboy (6)
stbalbach (5)
tomcosgrave (5)
mathowie (5)
bas67 (5)
tpoh.org (5)
Ty Webb (5)
dejah420 (5)
russilwvong (5)
jenleigh (5)
gman (5)
reenum (5)
Rhaomi (5)
raaka (4)
Oxydude (4)
donkeyschlong (4)
Irontom (4)
Asparagirl (4)
Steven Den Beste (4)
mmarcos (4)
elpapacito (4)
Sinner (4)
MiguelCardoso (4)
mediareport (4)
Dunvegan (4)
Steve_at_Linnwood (4)
XQUZYPHYR (4)
Kattullus (4)
bardic (4)
goodnewsfortheinsane (4)
jeffburdges (4)
numberstation (4)
East Manitoba Regi... (4)
cell divide (3)
andre_111 (3)
riffola (3)
crunchland (3)
krisjohn (3)
insomnia_lj (3)
crasspastor (3)
Voyageman (3)

Internet to be destroyed by terrorists, film at 11

Some media are reporting the prediction by computer experts at Moscow's Kaspersky Labs that parts of the Internet will be shut-down tomorrow by cyber-terrorists. The Internet Storm Center's comment: "The ISC would like to go out on a limb and predict that the Internet will not vaporize into a cloud of nothingness this Thursday, but if it does, it's been our pleasure to help stave off its inevitable annihilation this long."
posted by tranquileye on Aug 25, 2004 - 30 comments

I had trouble sleeping Saturday night because of a CNN story suggesting that "increased level of chatter and activity" indicated that "another al Qaeda terrorist operation could be in the works." The "warnings" have been coming ever since: Cheney said Sunday that future attacks were "almost a certainty" and FBI director Robert Mueller stated "we will not be able to stop it", with Ridge and Rumsfeld spinning similar tales today. Is there a new threat? Ridge hasn't changed the nation's security alert from "yellow," and AP reported today that "a top White House aide said last week's criticism prompted a two-pronged political response: Bush accused Democrats of playing politics with the issue as his advisers reminded voters that America is still a target."
posted by tranquileye on May 21, 2002 - 57 comments

On the heels of calls for an investigation into the failure of the American intelligence community to "connect the dots" prior to September 11th, Vice President Cheney says that a future attack against the United States is "almost certain." On Saturday an unnamed White House official said U.S. intelligence officials have detected "enhanced activity" that points to a potential new attack against the United States or American interests abroad.
posted by tranquileye on May 19, 2002 - 53 comments

A bit of a sea change at CNN.com: the "War on Terror" news heading, which has been part of the right column of CNN's home page since late September 2001, is gone, and not coincidentally, the massive non-news of the arrest of actor Robert Blake is the lead story. Not the growing world outrage over the Israel action in Jenin, nor the death of four Canadian soldiers by an errant US bomb.
posted by tranquileye on Apr 19, 2002 - 41 comments

"Just as the War Against Drugs would make some kind of sense if they honestly called it a War Against Some Drugs, I regard Dubya's current Kampf as a War Against Some Terrorists. I may remain wed to that horrid heresy until he bombs CIA headquarters in Langtry." Recent thoughts from Futurist, author, and stand-up comic Robert Anton Wilson.
posted by tranquileye on Dec 5, 2001 - 29 comments

An email sent between two cities in China probably would travel through the United States -- putting its contents under American jurisdiction.

An email sent between two cities in China probably would travel through the United States -- putting its contents under American jurisdiction. The recently approved anti-terrorism law is a "massive expansion of U.S. sovereignty" that could be used to prosecute foreign hackers. And once that precedent is established, much of global Internet communications could come under American authority.
posted by tranquileye on Nov 22, 2001 - 17 comments

Paper says bin Laden claims he has nuclear weapons.

Paper says bin Laden claims he has nuclear weapons. Pakistan's respected Dawn newspaper said on Saturday bin Laden, in an interview inside Afghanistan, said he had nuclear and chemical weapons and might use them to respond to U.S. attacks. Maybe he read DSSi's strategic scenario analysis.
posted by tranquileye on Nov 9, 2001 - 37 comments

With the FBI advising how to handle suspicious mail [pdf], the fine people who send you junk snail mail are changing their methods. The Canadian and American Direct Marketing Associations are recommending that their members ''consider notifying consumers by phone or e-mail that a direct-mail piece is on its way so they are not alarmed when it arrives." One cancelled campaign involved mailing marbles to some prospective clients.
posted by tranquileye on Oct 24, 2001 - 2 comments

Canada gets it own Star Chamber.

Canada gets it own Star Chamber. New "anti-terrorism" bill allows police to arrest and hold "suspects" for 72 hours without a charge, allows the government agency that monitors foreign communications to spy on Canadians, and creates "investigative hearings" in which you can be compelled to testify before a judge.
posted by tranquileye on Oct 16, 2001 - 8 comments

"I don't support military action: 12%"

"I don't support military action: 12%" Online CNN poll asks, "For how long would you be willing to support U.S. military action against terrorism?" There are a lot more pacifists then I would have expected, given the circumstances. Of course, "As long as it takes" sits at 76%, which is also not surprising. We'll see what that number is in six months...
posted by tranquileye on Sep 18, 2001 - 25 comments

How are we really any different from them if we can suggest "selective genocide" and "complete destruction and annihilation"?
posted by tranquileye on Sep 12, 2001 - 20 comments

Page: 1