<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with terrorists and war</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/terrorists+war</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'terrorists' and 'war' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:41:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:41:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20617/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sptimes.com/2002/10/05/news_pf/Worldandnation/Graham__Expect_retali.shtml"&gt;&quot;Worst case is modern Armaggedon&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Dick Cheney reportedly has ambitious plans to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Conover100302/conover100302.html&quot;&gt;chop Iraq into little pieces&lt;/a&gt; but Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Bob Graham worries that terrorist attacks against Americans were &quot;highly likely&quot; in the event of a war with Iraq, which Graham thinks could escalate into &quot;modern Armaggedon&quot;.  Also worried or unimpressed by the Bush Adminstration&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/10/02/fiorewhy.DTL&quot;&gt;rational for war&lt;/a&gt; (flash) &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2304695.stm&quot;&gt;a few Americans protested&lt;/a&gt; . The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fair.org/activism/london-protests.html&quot;&gt;NYT and the Washington Post ignored the large protests in Britain&lt;/a&gt;, but nobody could ignore it when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20021005-022012-6259r&quot;&gt;1.5 million Italians hit the streets. &lt;/a&gt; Guess it&apos;s war anyway, eh? 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20617</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:41:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bobgraham</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18445/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.againstbombing.org/"&gt;Americans against World Empire.&lt;/a&gt;  This Conservative/Libertarian coalition presents analysis, articles, links, opinions and rants from every corner of the political spectrum. &quot;&quot;Perpetual war serves a number of purposes.....It is under wartime conditions that the U.S. state will, at least initially, face the least resistance as it finishes the......process of gutting the Bill of Rights and voiding inconvenient parts of the U.S. Constitution......It is under wartime conditons that all opponents of U.S. policies anywhere in the world, including within the U.S. itself, can be most easily labled &apos;terrorist.&apos;&quot;  This statement would have come from a conservative in 1940.  Today it is from the Left. (Alternative Press Review, spring 2002).

    
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18445</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:51:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alternativepressreview</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>libertarians</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>states</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>theleft</category>
		<category>united</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usconstitution</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Mack Twain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12899/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rawilson.com/prethought.shtml&quot;&gt;&quot;Just as the War Against Drugs would make some kind of sense if they honestly called it a War Against Some Drugs, I regard Dubya&apos;s current Kampf as a War Against Some Terrorists. I may remain wed to that horrid heresy until he bombs CIA headquarters in Langtry.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Recent thoughts from Futurist, author, and stand-up comic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rawilson.com/main.shtml&quot;&gt;Robert Anton Wilson&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12899</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2001 10:51:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>RAW</category>
		<category>RobertAntonWilson</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10067/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bragg.army.mil/www-82dv/"&gt;Paratroopers?&lt;/a&gt; Or cruise missiles?  What will America&apos;s military response be if the Taliban are determined to be liable?  The Russians certainly didn&apos;t too well with a conventional military attack on Afghanistan.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10067</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:49:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>September11</category>
		<category>taliban</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>worldtradecenter</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


