<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with theology and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/theology+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'theology' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:16:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:16:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Reinhold Niebuhr</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80039/Reinhold%2DNiebuhr</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22472"&gt;What You Can Learn&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinhold_Niebuhr&quot;&gt;Reinhold Niebuhr&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80039</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AndrewBacevich</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>ReinholdNiebuhr</category>
		<category>Theology</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Spherical Wave Structure of Matter in Space</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78755/The%2DSpherical%2DWave%2DStructure%2Dof%2DMatter%2Din%2DSpace</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spaceandmotion.com/"&gt;On Truth and Reality.&lt;/a&gt; Despite several thousand years of failure to correctly understand physical reality (hence the current &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy-Postmodernism.htm&quot;&gt;postmodern view that this is impossible&lt;/a&gt;) it is actually very simple to work out how matter exists and moves about in Space. The rules of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Ockhams-Razor.htm&quot;&gt;Science (Occam&apos;s Razor / Simplicity)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/metaphysics.htm&quot;&gt;Metaphysics (Dynamic Unity of Reality)&lt;/a&gt; require that reality be described from only one single source existing, as Leibniz wrote: &lt;em&gt;&quot;because of the interconnection of all things with one another.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;The Four Main Purposes of this Website&lt;/strong&gt;

1. To help people understand truth and reality
2. To realize that we are structures of the universe
3. To solve the central problems of knowledge
4. To share this knowledge with others

Deduce the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Most-Simple-Scientific-Theory-Reality.htm&quot;&gt;simple science theory of reality&lt;/a&gt;, the wave structure of matter in Space, then deduce from this to show that it works. There is no opinion involved - it shows that science does work - we just needed the correct (most simple) foundations.

Given the Wave Structure of Matter in Space it is now possible to explain what mathematics is, how it can exist in the universe, and thus why it is so well suited for describing physical quantities (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/mathematical-physics/logic-truth-reality.htm&quot;&gt;mathematical physics&lt;/a&gt;).

We can simplify Einstein&apos;s foundations of representing matter as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Albert-Einstein-Theory-Relativity.htm&quot;&gt;continuous fields in space-time, to waves in continuous space&lt;/a&gt;. It does lead to a very simple, sensible foundation for understanding physical reality, and thus how you exist in the universe.

This article basically explains the main subjects of quantum theory from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Quantum-Theory-Mechanics.htm&quot;&gt;Wave Structure of Matter foundation&lt;/a&gt; (wave mechanics). If you prefer shorter summaries just browse the quantum physics links on either side of the page.

The purpose of the Cosmology page is to simply explain the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology.htm&quot;&gt;two cosmology theories that are consistent with current observations&lt;/a&gt;. You will need a basic understanding of the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) before you read it. This WSM cosmology is actually describing what you really are, how you exist in this space of the universe and interact with everything around you.

There is a revolution coming in the foundations of our knowledge because we have solved the central problem of metaphysics, of what exists (space) that causes and connects the many things we experience (waves in space that form matter, the discrete and separate particle an illusion of our limited senses). Matter is large, a structure of space, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy.htm&quot;&gt;this truth about reality will change humanity&lt;/a&gt;.

If we are to discuss &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/theology-morality-god-world-religions.htm&quot;&gt;God and Religion&lt;/a&gt;, it is obvious that we must clearly define the meaning of these words (as all words are human constructions). In Philosophy God is generally referred to as the One thing that exists, infinite and eternal, that causes and connects the many things. Likewise, Religion, from Latin &apos;religare&apos; meaning &apos;to bind&apos;, describes our connection to God as the One thing which exists. From this foundation we then see the clear connection between the sciences of philosophy, physics, metaphysics, and theology, as they are all founded on this Reality of One thing existing.

As humans have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/evolution-ecology-nature-culture-society.htm&quot;&gt;evolved from Nature&lt;/a&gt; they ultimately depend upon Nature for their survival. Until we understand what we are as humans (what matter is) and how we are connected to the universe (reality), it is impossible for humanity to be wise, and to be able to evolve cultural knowledge that enables us to live in harmony with Nature.

It is well known that our senses are deceptive, that when we see things as being separate and discrete bodies this is an illusion. Using science terminology then all we are really talking about is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/health/index.htm&quot;&gt;evolution and ecology&lt;/a&gt;. That all things in the universe (including life on earth) are interconnected and changing (the dynamic unity of reality).

Teaching people how to think correctly and to use language carefully (to work out the truth for themselves) is a pretty &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy-Education.htm&quot;&gt;good start for education&lt;/a&gt; (i.e. by teaching philosophy to students from a young age).

If we are to improve human societies (which has become an urgent problem) we must consider the forces that determine their evolution. And four of the most significant factors are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceandmotion.com/society/politics-economics-truth-utopia.htm&quot;&gt;market economics, politics&lt;/a&gt;, education (the knowledge foundations of the people) and Nature. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78755</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>cosmology</category>
		<category>ecology</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>learning</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>matter</category>
		<category>metaphysics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>quantumtheory</category>
		<category>relativity</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<category>wisdom</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The most important Evangelical you&apos;ve never heard of</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65973/The%2Dmost%2Dimportant%2DEvangelical%2Dyouve%2Dnever%2Dheard%2Dof</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rationalpi.com/theshelter/there.html&quot;&gt;Christianity is not just a series of truths but Truth&lt;/a&gt; -- Truth about all of reality. And the holding to that Truth intellectually... brings forth not only certain personal results, but also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peopleforlife.org/francis.html&quot;&gt;governmental and legal results.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;When the Religious Right cruised onto the cultural scene in the late 1970s, the road map was drawn by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.labri.org/&quot;&gt;oddball&lt;/a&gt; Pennsylvanian &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/000891.html&quot;&gt;Francis Schaeffer.&lt;/a&gt; Generally regarded as the first (perhaps only) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcahistory.org/documents/schaefferreview.html&quot;&gt;Evangelical philosopher&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1997/march3/7t322a.html&quot;&gt;Schaeffer&apos;s views on the fundamental clash between Christian and secular belief systems&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://walkingtogether.typepad.com/walking_together/2007/09/francis-schaeff.html&quot;&gt;became the talking points&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://mainstreambaptist.blogspot.com/2006/02/on-francis-schaeffers-christian.html&quot;&gt;for a generation of American Christians.&lt;/a&gt; The movement&apos;s trajectory, though, left many of Schaeffer&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arcapologetics.org/blog/2006/04/francis-schaeffer-speaks-to-problem-of.html&quot;&gt;more nuanced beliefs&lt;/a&gt; by the wayside. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frankschaeffer.com/&quot;&gt;His son&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beliefnet.com/story/135/story_13586_1.html&quot;&gt;recent writings&lt;/a&gt; suggest that &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstatesman.com/200710250048&quot;&gt;it didn&apos;t take long&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071015/smiley&quot;&gt;for the father of the Religious Right to regret what he&apos;d birthed.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65973</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:58:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>francisschaeffer</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>religiousright</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<dc:creator>verb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bill Moyers on democracy excrutiate.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34358/Bill%2DMoyers%2Don%2Ddemocracy%2Dexcrutiate</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=magazine.article&amp;amp;issue=soj0408&amp;amp;article=040810"&gt;&quot;How do we nurture the healing side of religion over the killing side? How do we protect the soul of democracy against bad theology in service of an imperial state?&lt;/a&gt; OVER THE PAST few years, as the poor got poorer, the health care crisis worsened, wealth and media became more and more concentrated, and our political system was bought out from under us, prophetic Christianity lost its voice. The Religious Right drowned everyone else out.  And they hijacked Jesus. The very Jesus who stood in Nazareth and proclaimed, &apos;The Lord has anointed me to preach the good news to the poor.&apos; The very Jesus who told 5,000 hungry people that all of you will be fed, not just some of you. The very Jesus who challenged the religious orthodoxy of the day by feeding the hungry on the Sabbath, who offered kindness to the prostitute and hospitality to the outcast, who raised the status of women and treated even the tax collector like a child of God. The very Jesus who drove the money changers from the temple. This Jesus has been hijacked and turned into a guardian of privilege instead of a champion of the dispossessed. Hijacked, he was made over into a militarist, hedonist, and lobbyist, sent prowling the halls of Congress in Guccis, seeking tax breaks and loopholes for the powerful, costly new weapon systems that don&apos;t work, and punitive public policies.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
Bill Moyers on democracy excruciate.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34358</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:03:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billmoyers</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>democracyexcrutiate</category>
		<category>imperialstate</category>
		<category>jesus</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>religiousright</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<dc:creator>fold_and_mutilate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18313/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.policyreview.org/JUN02/kurtz.html"&gt;The World Politics Heavyweight Fight: Huntington vs. Fukuyama: &lt;/a&gt; Which of these two now classic approaches offers a more plausible vision of the world&apos;s future?  Huntington&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alamut.com/subj/economics/misc/clash.html&quot;&gt;Culture Clash&lt;/a&gt;[&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;Foreign Affairs&lt;/b&gt;, 1993&lt;/small&gt;] or Fukuyama&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wku.edu/~sullib/history.htm&quot;&gt;Pax Democratia&lt;/a&gt;[&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;National Interest&lt;/b&gt;, 1989&lt;/small&gt;]? In an updating mode, &lt;b&gt;Stanley Kurtz&lt;/b&gt;[&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;Policy Review&lt;/b&gt;, 2002&lt;/small&gt;] measures their chances from a political viewpoint.  On the same front,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crosscurrents.org/Mileswinter2002.htm&quot;&gt;Jack Miles&lt;/a&gt;[&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cross Currents&lt;/b&gt;, 2002&lt;/small&gt;] offers a refreshingly liberal and optimistic theological perspective.  Yep, it&apos;s &lt;b&gt;still&lt;/b&gt; all about East meeting West, the Muslims and the rest of the us. Or even &lt;b&gt;increasingly&lt;/b&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18313</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:45:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crosscurrents</category>
		<category>cultureclash</category>
		<category>foreignaffairs</category>
		<category>francisfukuyama</category>
		<category>huntington</category>
		<category>jackmiles</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>nationalinterest</category>
		<category>paxdemocratia</category>
		<category>policyreview</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>stanleykurtz</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


