<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with thomaspynchon and pynchon</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/thomaspynchon+pynchon</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'thomaspynchon' and 'pynchon' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:50:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:50:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Admit That Byron Was No Good</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/126317/Admit%2DThat%2DByron%2DWas%2DNo%2DGood</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free&quot;&gt;Free Information&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_culture_movement&quot;&gt;movement&lt;/a&gt; as seen through &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Pynchon&quot;&gt;Thomas Pynchon&lt;/a&gt;&#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://lukedanger.blogspot.pt/2009/02/story-of-byron-bulb.html&quot;&gt;&#8216;Byron the Bulb&#8217;&lt;/a&gt; story.

&lt;em&gt;In one sense, Byron is a tangent&#8212;a rogue sketch that found its way into [&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity%27s_Rainbow&quot;&gt;Gravity&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140188592/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Rainbow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;] perhaps because Pynchon liked it. In another sense, Byron is GR condensed to a general thesis. On what? Hell, any number of interpretations could be derived from Byron, but I like to think that it reads as revelation. And the revelation is this: from the moment homo sapiens fashioned the first tool to the moment we are finally and completely extinguished, we are fated to be governed by those who control technology.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/195942/free-information-movement-as-seen-through-thomas-pynchons-byron-the-bulb-story/&quot;&gt;An essay from Death And Taxes mag&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2013:site.126317</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:50:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>byronthebulb</category>
		<category>deathandtaxesmag</category>
		<category>freeinformation</category>
		<category>gravitysrainbow</category>
		<category>informationwantstobefree</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<dc:creator>chavenet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Start of a Duel (Buried in The Sun)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/124831/Start%2Dof%2Da%2DDuel%2DBuried%2Din%2DThe%2DSun</link>
		<description> For years, rumors have swirled about a picture of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Fari%C3%B1a&quot;&gt;Richard&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pynchon.pomona.edu/uncollected/farina.html&quot;&gt;Fari&amp;#0241;a&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Pynchon&quot;&gt;Thomas&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR0588DtHJA&quot;&gt;Pynchon&lt;/a&gt; dueling in a cemetery. We heard about this rumor, dug around, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawsofsilence.blogspot.pt/2013/02/start-of-duel-buried-in-sun_9.html&quot;&gt;found that the picture is hidden in plain site on the Internet&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2013:site.124831</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:42:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cornell</category>
		<category>kirkpatricksale</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<dc:creator>chavenet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>--o---&lt;&lt;|</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/123496/o</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-happy-thomas-pynchon-rumor-day-20130104,0,6953343.story"&gt;Happy Thomas Pynchon rumor day! &lt;small&gt;[LAtimes.com]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;What&apos;s that, you say? America&apos;s most reclusive author, Thomas Pynchon, appeared in the news Friday --  not once but twice? Why, yes, yes, he has, surfacing in two unconnected rumours. Conspiracy? Pynchonian? Maybe we should henceforth designate Jan. 4 as Thomas Pynchon Rumor Day.&quot; &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Rumor 1:&lt;/strong&gt; Pynchon has a new novel &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/RonCharles/status/287246335743254529&quot;&gt;coming this fall titled &quot;Bleeding Edge.&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

&lt;strong&gt;Rumor 2:&lt;/strong&gt; Pynchon &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/pageviews/2012/12/thomas-pynchon-may-be-working-with-paul-thomas-anderson-on-inherent-vice-film&quot;&gt;may be working&lt;/a&gt;&quot; on the film adaptation of his novel &quot;Inherent Vice&quot; with director Paul Thomas Anderson.&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2013:site.123496</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:39:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adaptation</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>ptanderson</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>recluse</category>
		<category>rumours</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<category>writing</category>
		<dc:creator>Fizz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;It may be easier to be private than anyone thinks,&quot; Patton says.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/116631/It%2Dmay%2Dbe%2Deasier%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dprivate%2Dthan%2Danyone%2Dthinks%2DPatton%2Dsays</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&apos;http://nymag.com/print/?/arts/books/features/48268/&apos;&gt;Meet Your Neighbor, Thomas Pynchon&lt;/a&gt;, From the November 11, 1996 issue of New York Magazine.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.116631</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:37:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anonymity</category>
		<category>newyork</category>
		<category>newyorkcity</category>
		<category>newyorkmagazine</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>recluse</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<dc:creator>the man of twists and turns</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We Pledge Allegiance to King Ludd</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/94856/We%2DPledge%2DAllegiance%2Dto%2DKing%2DLudd</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/pynchon_essays_luddite.html"&gt;Is It Okay to Be a Luddite?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/pynchon_essays.html&quot;&gt;Thomas Pynchon&lt;/a&gt; wants to know.  In an essay from 1984, Pynchon responds to the 25th Anniversary of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.P._Snow&quot;&gt;C.P. Snow&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:VJ9AQ3v_MLIJ:sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/snow_1959.pdf+c.p.+snow+the+two+cultures+and+the+scientific+revolution&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESi2ZpAqTO9qFy1F7PtGP-fnlaWYf5WPWpEhnRTXTL4v9N0DpPvB82eVpW_uWK3gRvdeWU3DFnr9Xcq2djAHTvPiOiyMJ-9vyqA6aqqnr4iqcbyKhKHnxuAatEx2Jj0-PQ7S2arU&amp;sig=AHIEtbRNsyH-Yqj-_Mc7RFIMhPy0gqVU5A&quot;&gt;&quot;The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; The term, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=luddite&quot;&gt;&quot;luddite,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; has come to be used as a term of opprobrium for &lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/ok-you-luddites-time-to-chill-on-facebook-over-privacy/&quot;&gt;anyone who opposes technology&lt;/a&gt; or, even more inappropriately, for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techforluddites.com/&quot;&gt;people who don&apos;t understand technology&lt;/a&gt;.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=NG6ABlDQ10MC&amp;dq=writings+of+the+luddites&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=bn&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=KG5oTMi-BoH98Aa14pS0BA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CDEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false&quot;&gt;real&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite&quot;&gt;Luddites&lt;/a&gt;, however, consisted of groups of artisans out to defend their trades from machines that directly competed with them.  Pynchon sets out to defend Luddism, in both its 18th century and 20th century variants:   

&lt;i&gt;Ned Lud&apos;s anger was not directed at the machines, not exactly. I like to think of it more as the controlled, martial-arts type anger of the dedicated Badass.
...
The knitting machines which provoked the first Luddite disturbances had been putting people out of work for well over two centuries. Everybody saw this happening -- it became part of daily life. They also saw the machines coming more and more to be the property of men who did not work, only owned and hired. It took no German philosopher, then or later, to point out what this did, had been doing, to wages and jobs. Public feeling about the machines could never have been simple unreasoning horror, but likely something more complex: the love/hate that grows up between humans and machinery -- especially when it&apos;s been around for a while -- not to mention serious resentment toward at least two multiplications of effect that were seen as unfair and threatening. One was the concentration of capital that each machine represented, and the other was the ability of each machine to put a certain number of humans out of work -- to be &quot;worth&quot; that many human souls. What gave King Ludd his special Bad charisma, took him from local hero to nationwide public enemy, was that he went up against these amplified, multiplied, more than human opponents and prevailed.&lt;/i&gt;

(It&apos;s also worth pointing to this little gem from the end of the essay:

&lt;i&gt;If our world survives, the next great challenge to watch out for will come -- you heard it here first -- when the curves of research and development in artificial intelligence, molecular biology and robotics all converge.&lt;/i&gt;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.94856</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:20:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CPsnow</category>
		<category>luddism</category>
		<category>luddite</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<category>twocultures</category>
		<dc:creator>outlandishmarxist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pynchon Paper Dolls</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55854/Pynchon%2DPaper%2DDolls</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wso.williams.edu/~dgambrel/pics/pynchon/"&gt;Thomas Pynchon Paper Dolls&lt;/a&gt; Something light because, yes, it&apos;s the run-up to the November 21st release of Against the Day, the new 1000 page doorstop from Thomas Pynchon.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/countingdown.html&quot;&gt;The Modern Word&lt;/a&gt; is using the time to update their already vast Pynchon site.  Good luck.  (A whole lot of other paper dolls &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/15791&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55854</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:26:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanliterature</category>
		<category>dolls</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>logorrhea</category>
		<category>paper</category>
		<category>paperdolls</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<category>williamwantsadoll</category>
		<dc:creator>OmieWise</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Literary Labors of Love and Linkage</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32009/Literary%2DLabors%2Dof%2DLove%2Dand%2DLinkage</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;&lt;em&gt;What really knocks me out is a book that, when you&apos;re all done reading it, you wish the author that wrote it was a terrific friend of yours and you could call him up on the phone whenever you felt like it. That doesn&apos;t happen much, though.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Holden Caulfield in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.levity.com/corduroy/salinger1.htm&quot; title=&quot;The Praises and Criticisms of J.D. Salinger&apos;s The Catcher in the Rye &quot;&gt;Catcher In The Rye&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.levity.com/corduroy/salinger.htm&quot; title=&quot;...What gets me about D.B., though, he hated the war so much, and yet he got me to read this book A Farewell to Arms last summer. He said it was so terrific. That&apos;s what I can&apos;t understand. It had this guy in it named Lieutenant Henry that was supposed to be a nice guy and all. I don&apos;t see how D.B. could hate the Army and war and all so much and still like a phony like that. I mean, for instance, I don&apos;t see how he could like a phony like that and still like that one by Ring Lardner, or that other one he&apos;s so crazy about, The Great Gatsby. D.B. got sore when I said that, and said I was too young and all to appreciate it, but I don&apos;t think so. I told him I liked Ring Lardner and The Great Gatsby and all. I did, too. I was crazy about The Great Gatsby. Old Gatsby. Old sport. That killed me. Anyway, I&apos;m sort of glad they&apos;ve got the atomic bomb invented. If there&apos;s ever another war, I&apos;m going to sit right the hell on top of it. I&apos;ll volunteer for it, I swear to God I will.&quot;&gt;J.D. Salinger&lt;/a&gt; did not quite agree but then, if you can&apos;t hang out with his secretive self, or any other chosen literary icon, you can build her or him a fitting shrine or two or three. It&apos;s not quite &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.clas.ufl.edu/users/agordon/pynchon.htm&quot; title=&quot;Nevertheless, from my brief encounter with Pynchon I gleaned a few things about the man behind the screen. I know that he follows the reviews and evidently cares what critics say about him. That he probably has help with his research. That he usually works slowly and disparages Lot 49--wrongly, I believe--because he wrote hastily. That he&apos;s shy, doesn&apos;t talk much, and doesn&apos;t open up to strangers. That he&apos;s intense and has lots of nervous energy--the nail biting and cup shredding. That he picks his friends carefully to guard himself: no wonder trust and betrayal are central themes in Vineland. That he writes his friends into his fiction. That, at least during the late sixties, he was a heavy doper--thus his sympathy with an aging, beleagured head like Zoyd Wheeler. That he&apos;s generous, shares his stash and doesn&apos;t bogart his joints. That, like Benny Profane in V., he is &apos;&apos;given to sentimental impulses&apos;&apos; (1): he writes love letters, stays friends with a former lover, and shows up at her wedding. That, despite his reserved, introverted manner, he seems to care deeply: keep cool but care. That he reads a lot, including novels by his contemporaries. That he loves rock music, which is all over Vineland. That he&apos;s got a zany streak: the sense of play in his fiction is part of his life--he likes to set off firecrackers in the middle of the night. Does that explain the fascination with rockets in Gravity&apos;s Rainbow? Probably not, but it&apos;s nice to think of his fiction as a string of exploding firecrackers.&quot;&gt;Smoking Dope with Thomas Pynchon&lt;/a&gt; but...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32009</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:51:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>jdsalinger</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>salinger</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Orwellian, Dude!&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25551/Orwellian%2DDude</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,948203,00.html"&gt;&quot;Orwellian, Dude!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Elusive, legendary author &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pynchon.pomona.edu/bio/&quot;&gt;Thomas Pynchon&lt;/a&gt; resurfaces to intoduce a new edition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resort.com/~prime8/Orwell/&quot;&gt;Orwell&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondopolitico.com/library/1984/1984.htm&quot;&gt;Nineteen Eighty-Four&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; with a critical eye on the present. And finds optimism in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newspeakdictionary.com/ns-prin.html&quot;&gt;appendix&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25551</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2003 16:35:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1984</category>
		<category>georgeorwell</category>
		<category>nineteeneightyfour</category>
		<category>orwell</category>
		<category>pynchon</category>
		<category>thomaspynchon</category>
		<dc:creator>Bletch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


