<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with tlc</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/tlc</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'tlc' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:45:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:45:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Jon &amp;amp; Kate Plus 8: raising twins and sextuplets on reality TV</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72324/Jon%2Dand%2DKate%2DPlus%2D8%2Draising%2Dtwins%2Dand%2Dsextuplets%2Don%2Dreality%2DTV</link>
		<description> You&apos;re a couple in your 20s, with twin girls. Desiring to have just one more child, your fertility treatments result in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8#Sextuplets&quot;&gt;sextuplets&lt;/a&gt;. You are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sixgosselins.com/&quot;&gt;Gosselin&lt;/a&gt; family and your &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlc.discovery.com/tv/jon-and-kate/jon-and-kate.html&quot;&gt;reality TV show&lt;/a&gt; is about to start a 4th season. You have your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oprah.com/relationships/slide/20080222/rel_20080222_101.jhtml&quot;&gt;admirers&lt;/a&gt; and of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php?s=b012ad908f95854f9fd63ec4e1524a8a&amp;showtopic=3172271&amp;st=2235&quot;&gt;cri&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gosselinswithoutpity.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;tics&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72324</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:45:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gosselin</category>
		<category>jon</category>
		<category>kat</category>
		<category>realitytv</category>
		<category>setuplets</category>
		<category>tlc</category>
		<category>twins</category>
		<dc:creator>jaimev</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ripper Case Closed?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22170/Ripper%2DCase%2DClosed</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getty.edu/art/collections/bio/a3670-1.html&quot;&gt;Walter&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wetcanvas.com/Museum/Artists/s/Walter_Sickert/&quot;&gt;Sickert&lt;/a&gt; was a renowned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/news_comment/artistsinprofile/sickert.shtml&quot;&gt;impressionist&lt;/a&gt; painter. In her new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/asin/0399149325/ref=ase_theartcyclopedia/002-5939652-0117646&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt;, author &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phenomenalwomen.com/showcase/writing/shellie_rabago.htm&quot;&gt;Patricia Cornwell&lt;/a&gt; also claims that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artcyclopedia.com/artists/sickert_walter_richard.html&quot;&gt;Sickert&lt;/a&gt; was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.casebook.org/dissertations/dst-pamandsickert.html&quot;&gt;Jack the Ripper&lt;/a&gt;. 

Whether you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/11/12/1036308672526.html&quot;&gt;believe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.casebook.org/dissertations/dst-artofmurder.html&quot;&gt;her theory&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,615413,00.html&quot;&gt;not&lt;/a&gt;,  Cornwell is certainly getting &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/pt_ripper_011206.html&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/29/print/main527340.shtml&quot;&gt;lot&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/output/books/sho-sunday-cornwell17x.html&quot;&gt;of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/25/findlaw.analysis.dean.ripper/&quot;&gt;press&lt;/a&gt; out of this. 

If all these links aren&apos;t enough for you, you can also watch a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patriciacornwell.com/news_main.html&quot;&gt;documentary on Cornwell and her Jack the Ripper theory&lt;/a&gt; tonight at 10 p.m. EST on The Learning Channel. &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22170</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 06:51:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>book</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>JackTheRipper</category>
		<category>PatriciaCromwell</category>
		<category>Ripper</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>theory</category>
		<category>TLC</category>
		<category>WalterSickert</category>
		<dc:creator>Reggie452</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18492/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/07/16/trading.spaces/index.html"&gt;Whether it is Frank&apos;s art, Doug&apos;s grids, Vern&apos;s brilliant lighting solutions, or Hilde&apos;s straw on walls&lt;/a&gt; TLC&apos;s &quot;Trading Spaces&quot; is a strangely compelling show that, until I found this link at CNN, I thought my fiance and I were the only ones watching.  The show is great and all, my question is just that with this, &quot;A Makeover Story&quot;, &quot;A Wedding Story&quot; and &quot;A Baby Story&quot;, is it really &quot;The Learning Channel&quot; anymore?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18492</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 01:11:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tlc</category>
		<category>tradingspaces</category>
		<dc:creator>McBain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16900/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nascar.com/2002/news/cnnsi/05/02/lopes/"&gt;Dale Earnhardt, Inc to honor Lisa &apos;Left Eye&apos; Lopes&lt;/a&gt; tonight at the Pontiac 400, thanks to autopsy photos circulating on the net. &quot;We want to express our deepest sympathy to her family, friends and fans. She was a very gifted young woman who will be greatly missed. She has a huge following here at our shop.&quot; The DEI cars -- driven by Steve Park, Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Michael Waltrip -- will each carry a [black] stripe under the left headlight. In addition, over the wall pit crew members on all three teams will wear black stripes under their left eye in Saturday night&apos;s event.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16900</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2002 10:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>daleearnhardt</category>
		<category>lefteye</category>
		<category>lisalopes</category>
		<category>pontiac400</category>
		<category>racing</category>
		<category>tlc</category>
		<dc:creator>junkbox</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16653/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=638&amp;amp;ncid=762&amp;amp;e=1&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020426/en_nm/people_tlc_dc"&gt;TLC&apos;s Lisa &quot;Left Eye&quot; Lopes dies.&lt;/a&gt; A car accident in Honduras. I sure hope her record company behaves itself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16653</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 01:02:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>car</category>
		<category>crash</category>
		<category>honduras</category>
		<category>lefteye</category>
		<category>lisalopes</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>tlc</category>
		<dc:creator>allaboutgeorge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13686/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://tlc.discovery.com/schedule/episode.jsp?episode=553260000"&gt;Hackers: Computer Outlaws&lt;/a&gt; A TLC show(that I&apos;m 3/4 through) that seems to actually use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0141000511/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;reliable sources&lt;/a&gt; to discuss not just cracker behavior, but also the creative side of hackers, pointing out the developments attributed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woz.org/&quot;&gt;some hackers&lt;/a&gt;.

Now Markoff and Mitnick. Not a bad little show....
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13686</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 22:53:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>crackers</category>
		<category>cracking</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TLC</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>dglynn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9679/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://tlc.discovery.com/convergence/humanface/humanface.html"&gt;This interesting mini-series&lt;/a&gt; about the human face on TLC (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/humanface/index.shtml&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt;), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/humanface/exp_smile.shtml&quot;&gt; claims that technology and the Internet are replacing face-to-face contact&lt;/a&gt;, but without much needed facial expressions that play a crucial role in communication.  No doubt, this is why we THINK OF CAPITAL LETTERS as &quot;yelling&quot; and use :) and :P in online communication.  Where do you see online communication in 10 years?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9679</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:35:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>communication</category>
		<category>face</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>TLC</category>
		<dc:creator>canoeguide</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7506/</link>
		<description> Is TV dumbed down so much these days that even educational or documentary material needs to appeal on a broader audience? It seems that TLC and Discovery are going overboard in their need to draw viewers, though, then their motto &apos;a place for learning minds&apos; becomes just another example of false advertising. If you were to tune in at prime time, chances are the stuff that&apos;s on would be about   &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlc.discovery.com/tlcpages/alien/alien.html&quot;&gt;a)aliens&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/jesus/jesus.html&quot;&gt;b)Christianity&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/area51/zone/6496/index2.htm&quot;&gt;c)aliens and Christianity&lt;/a&gt;. Tune in for TLC you&apos;ll always get &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlc.discovery.com/schedule/episode.jsp?episode=553203001&quot;&gt;&apos;worst drivers 3: road rage&apos;&lt;/a&gt; or &apos;plastic surgery gone BAD&apos;. Their good productions, such as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlc.discovery.com/tlcpages/greatbooks/greatbooks.html&quot;&gt;Great Books Series&lt;/a&gt; have been shut down over 2 years ago, and these days the most interesting stuff that&apos;s on is shown in reruns over at the discovery civilization or science channel. BBC and PBS creates interesting programs, but not all that often.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Sometimes people complain at how Survivor and the rest of the reality show stuff is dragging down TV to the  very bottom, but is it really effecting everything?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7506</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2001 09:38:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>discovery</category>
		<category>pbs</category>
		<category>tlc</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


