<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with top10</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/top10</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'top10' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:03:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:03:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>That part felt awkward</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85551/That%2Dpart%2Dfelt%2Dawkward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/david-letterman-blackmail-shocker-host-confeses-to-affairs-after-extortion-attempt/"&gt;David Letterman confesses on national TV.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85551</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:03:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>affair</category>
		<category>awkward</category>
		<category>david</category>
		<category>latenight</category>
		<category>letterman</category>
		<category>melman</category>
		<category>oprah</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>stupidpettricks</category>
		<category>top10</category>
		<category>uma</category>
		<category>willitfloat</category>
		<category>worldwidepants</category>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The 10 Best Top Ten Food Lists</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82141/The%2D10%2DBest%2DTop%2DTen%2DFood%2DLists</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.endlesssimmer.com/2009/06/02/the-top-10-top-10-food-lists/&quot;&gt;The 10 Best Top Ten Food Lists&lt;/a&gt;: the most erotic food scenes in movies, the creepiest fast food mascots, Tony Bourdain&apos;s nastiest snipes at fellow TV chefs, and more. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashfood.com/2009/06/02/top-10-top-10-lists/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82141</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:29:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>10</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>top10</category>
		<category>topten</category>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The best movies of all time?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71345/The%2Dbest%2Dmovies%2Dof%2Dall%2Dtime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/related_features/top_100_films/"&gt;The top 100 films According to The Times (UK)&lt;/a&gt; Another film list? The same old Citizen Kane? No - this one&#8217;s different, says The Times&#8217;s chief film critic James Christopher &lt;em&gt;The point of The Times Top 100 Films of All Time is to stimulate argument, and sharpen your own thoughts about the ingredents that make great movies. We shall be horrified if anyone agrees with every one of our choices.&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71345</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:46:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>argue</category>
		<category>best</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>discuss</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>top10</category>
		<category>watercoolerchat</category>
		<dc:creator>dawson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MetaListing to Port</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57434/MetaListing%2Dto%2DPort</link>
		<description> I am inspired by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2007/01/2006_list_of_li.html&quot;&gt;YesButNoButYes&apos;s 2006 List of Lists of Lists&lt;/a&gt;, which rightfully includes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fimoculous.com/year-review-2006.cfm&quot;&gt;Fimoculous&apos; List of Lists&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcsweeneys.net/links/lists/&quot;&gt;The list of McSweeney&apos;s Lists&lt;/a&gt;, but missed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bestweekever.tv/2006/12/21/the-10-best-10-best-lists-of-2006-7-the-10-best-lists/&quot;&gt;BestWeekEver&apos;s 10 Best Lists&lt;/a&gt; (ironically only #7 of their 10 Best 10 Best Lists) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/story/30157/&quot;&gt;Alternet&apos;s (less political than usual) Ten Best Top-Ten Lists&lt;/a&gt;. I would have put these in numerical order, but you all would have killed me for it. There&apos;s also the perennial &lt;a href=&quot;http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~meburns/canons.html&quot;&gt;(Not Necessarily Canonical) List of Canonical Lists&lt;/a&gt;, and while not thoroughly Meta, I loved &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.valleywag.com/tech/diggbait/top-ten-rules-for-a-top-ten-list-223128.php&quot;&gt;Valleywag&apos;s Top Ten Rules for a Top Ten List&lt;/a&gt; (ironically &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digg.com/offbeat_news/Top_10_Rules_That_Letterman_Should_Read_Before_Creating_Another_Top_10_List&quot;&gt;under-Digged&lt;/a&gt;) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/top_ten/archive/ls_topten_archive2006/ls_topten_archive_20061212.shtml&quot;&gt;Letterman&apos;s Top Ten Signs You Are Not One Of The Most Fascinating People Of 2006&lt;/a&gt; (of which, only #4 applies to me) via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.misscellania.com/&quot;&gt;Miss C.&lt;/a&gt; who also compiled the first list and who I am NOT cyberstalking, honest!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57434</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:36:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2006lists</category>
		<category>canonical</category>
		<category>diggbait</category>
		<category>fimoculous</category>
		<category>lettermantop10</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>mcsweeney</category>
		<category>top10</category>
		<category>yearendlists</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19032/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/index.html"&gt;British Film Institute Top Ten Poll for 2002&lt;/a&gt; is out. Compiled every 10 years by the folks who publish the Sight and Sound magazine, it asks 145 critics and 108 directors for their top 10 films ever. Both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/critics.html&quot;&gt;top&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/directors.html&quot;&gt;10s&lt;/a&gt; are filled with the usual suspects - yes, we all know who always &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/voted.php?film=Citizen+Kane+%28Welles%29&quot;&gt;wins&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s more interesting to browse the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/list.php?list=films&quot;&gt;full list&lt;/a&gt; of films voted for. Or read the individual top 10s and occasional comments by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/list.php?list=voters&amp;votertype=director&quot;&gt;directors who voted&lt;/a&gt;, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/voter.php?forename=Michael&amp;surname=Mann&quot;&gt;Michael Mann&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/voter.php?forename=Jim&amp;surname=Jarmusch&quot;&gt;Jim Jarmusch&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/voter.php?forename=Roger&amp;surname=Corman&quot;&gt;Roger Corman&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19032</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2002 07:03:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>sightandsound</category>
		<category>top10</category>
		<category>topten</category>
		<dc:creator>shortfuse</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


