<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with top100</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/top100</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'top100' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:10:28 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:10:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Your favorite decade sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your%2Dfavorite%2Ddecade%2Dsucks</link>
		<description> Rolling Stone&apos;s Top 100 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248017/100_best_albums_of_the_decade/&quot;&gt;Albums&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade/&quot;&gt;Songs&lt;/a&gt; of the decade  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.87346</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>albums</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>rollingstone</category>
		<category>songs</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>Brodiggitty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The next-gen hot 100 (game) developers 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69217/The%2Dnextgen%2Dhot%2D100%2Dgame%2Ddevelopers%2D2008</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;Next Generation presents the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=8736&amp;Itemid=2&amp;limit=1&amp;limitstart=0&quot;&gt;Hot 100 Game Developers of the year&lt;/a&gt;. See which developers are lighting up the world of games in 2008.&lt;/em&gt; For the impatient: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=8736&amp;Itemid=2&amp;limit=1&amp;limitstart=10&quot;&gt;skip to the end&lt;/a&gt;. From the article: &lt;em&gt;The ordering of this list represents the opinion of Next Generation. We feel the controversial nature of this presentation is appropriate to our primary goal of this feature, which is to inspire discussion about and promote awareness of the people who make the games rather than the games themselves (the games, after all, get center stage for the rest of the year). We feel that in 2008, these are the people who will greatly influence what you play and how you play it.&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69217</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:39:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>developers</category>
		<category>game</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>nextgen</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<category>videogame</category>
		<category>yourfavoritedevelopersucks</category>
		<dc:creator>slimepuppy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yahoo&apos;s top 100</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46273/Yahoos%2Dtop%2D100</link>
		<description> No list that puts MeFi at &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-men/7.html&quot;&gt;#55&lt;/a&gt; is perfect, but Yahoo&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-men/index.html&quot;&gt;100 Sites for Men&lt;/a&gt; includes lots of other goldmines, like an info source for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afraidtoask.com/&quot;&gt;embarassing problems&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hungover.net/&quot;&gt;hangover cures&lt;/a&gt;, and other gems like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drawyourboss.com/&quot;&gt;Draw Your Boss&lt;/a&gt;. 
Ladies, don&apos;t miss the top 100&lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-women/index.html&quot;&gt; Sites for Women&lt;/a&gt;, and if anyone&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballofpaint.freehosting.net/&quot;&gt;Ball of Paint&lt;/a&gt; needs are unfulfilled, you can always check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/100-weird/index.html&quot;&gt;Top 100 Weird Sites&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46273</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>links</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>BuddhaInABucket</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;the inclusion of Christopher Hitchens has already raised eyebrows in academia&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45577/the%2Dinclusion%2Dof%2DChristopher%2DHitchens%2Dhas%2Dalready%2Draised%2Deyebrows%2Din%2Dacademia</link>
		<description> Another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/34051&quot; title=&quot;mefi post about last year list&quot;&gt;year&lt;/a&gt;, another list of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7067&quot;&gt;top 100 intellectuals&lt;/a&gt; of our time from Prospect Magazine and with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3249&quot;&gt;Foreign Policy&lt;/a&gt;. Self-confessedly anglocentric, but with an effort &quot;to include thinkers from outside the west&quot;, it raises the perennial &apos;where are the women&apos; question (now in good company with &apos;where are the scientists&apos;) and sanctions the decline of: the left, France, Europe, psychology, psychiatry and philosophy. The ever present Germaine Greer says &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1582490,00.html&quot; title=&quot;article in the Guardian with reactions and comments about the list&quot;&gt;these lists are always so right-wing&lt;/a&gt;&quot; and her inclusion is &quot;absurd and completely unjustifiable&quot;. You can &lt;a href=&quot;http://prospectmagazine.co.uk/intellectuals/&quot;&gt;vote your 5 favourites&lt;/a&gt; and suggest other names.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45577</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:03:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intellectual</category>
		<category>intellectuals</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>prospect</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>funambulist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We don&apos;t need no pancakes!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37049/We%2Ddont%2Dneed%2Dno%2Dpancakes</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afi.com/&quot;&gt;American Film Institute&lt;/a&gt;, striving ever harder for relevancy, announces their latest movie list: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/quotes.aspx&quot;&gt;100 Years...100 Movie Quotes&lt;/a&gt;, to be shown in June.  Here&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afi.com/Docs/tvevents/pdf/quotes400.pdf&quot;&gt;list of 400 nominees&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[PDF]&lt;/small&gt;.  What was unjustly left out?  Let the debates begin!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37049</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 07:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afi</category>
		<category>americanfilminstitute</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>DevilsAdvocate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>My dad is cleverer than your dad!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34051/My%2Ddad%2Dis%2Dcleverer%2Dthan%2Dyour%2Ddad</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/HtmlPages/intellectuals.asp"&gt;Top 100 British...Intellectuals?&lt;/a&gt; Rock bands, schmock bands. Who are currently the cream of British Intelligentsia? Prospect &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/HtmlPages/intellectuals.asp&quot;&gt;names 100&lt;/a&gt; of (supposedly) the UK&apos;s finest and asks you to vote for your top 5, plus a write-in. The list is discussed further &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/start.asp?P_Article=12695&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Some entrants may make you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monbiot.com/&quot;&gt;wonder&lt;/a&gt;, some may make you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.melaniephillips.com/&quot;&gt;gasp&lt;/a&gt;, most you just won&apos;t have a clue about!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34051</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 04:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>British</category>
		<category>intellectual</category>
		<category>intellectuals</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>biffa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Somewhere over the rainbow...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33923/Somewhere%2Dover%2Dthe%2Drainbow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/songs.aspx"&gt;The American Film Institute&lt;/a&gt; (a.k.a. &quot;The Listmakers Who Just Won&apos;t Quit&quot;) have announced their &lt;strike&gt;long-awaited&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;ground-breaking&lt;/strike&gt; top 100 movie songs of all time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33923</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afi</category>
		<category>americanfilminstitute</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>songs</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>ChrisTN</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>500 Most Influential Rock Songs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29694/500%2DMost%2DInfluential%2DRock%2DSongs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.infoplease.com/ipea/A0150472.html"&gt;Spot The Essential, Seminal, How-Could-These-Imbeciles-Have-Forgotten? Popular Song:&lt;/a&gt; A well-made list, specially if it&apos;s authoritative and includes no less than 500 songs, is just asking to be cruelly inspected for omissions, ridiculed for certain inclusions and generally derided.  This one is, admittedly, a toughy.  But perhaps way too US-centric and too Rockist.  I mean, honestly, sometimes you Yanks act as if you&apos;d invented Pop music! ;) (&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;Via the newly-discovered &lt;b&gt;Rivurcated Bifets&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29694</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:03:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>rockist</category>
		<category>rocknroll</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<category>top500</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Big Read</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29039/The%2DBig%2DRead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/index.shtml"&gt;The Big Read.&lt;/a&gt; Here is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml&quot;&gt;100 top books&lt;/a&gt; as chosen by BBC Viewers, and here are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/vote/ &quot;&gt;top 21 finalists&lt;/a&gt; you can vote for. It goes without saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholastic.com/harrypotter/author/ &quot;&gt;Rowling&lt;/a&gt; is going to win, but what books would you like to have seen in the list, and who do you think should win?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29039</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 02:29:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pitchfork&apos;s Top 100 Albums of the 1980s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21694/Pitchforks%2DTop%2D100%2DAlbums%2Dof%2Dthe%2D1980s</link>
		<description> Today, the music critics at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pitchforkmedia.com&quot;&gt;pitchfork.com &lt;/a&gt;posted the first half of their &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pitchforkmedia.com&quot;&gt;Top 100 Albums of the 1980s&lt;/a&gt;&quot; feature.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21694</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>80s</category>
		<category>albums</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>pitchfork</category>
		<category>records</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21512/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;cid=638&amp;amp;ncid=579&amp;amp;e=1&amp;amp;u=/nm/20021109/en_nm/people_queen_dc"&gt;If this isn&apos;t a sign of the apocalypse, &lt;/a&gt; I don&apos;t know what is.  What should be on the list of the all-time greatest pop tunes?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21512</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2002 12:37:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>numberone</category>
		<category>pop</category>
		<category>singles</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>LittleMissCranky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17765/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/11/afi.romance.list.ap/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Chickflicks?&lt;/a&gt; The American Film Institute&apos;s list of top 100 U.S. screen romances. But the list lacks my three favorite romantic movies: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macbraveheart.co.uk/index.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Braveheart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/ebert_reviews/1993/09/877727.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;True Romance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, and &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/bulldurhamrhinson_a0c8e4.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Bull Durham&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I figured out a long time ago if I wanted a guy to take me to a tearjerker I would need to combine romance with machismo like sports, violence, and medieval weaponary. If you like to see tough guys wind up with trembling lips these three movies always get the job done.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Right guys?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17765</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:54:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afi</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>romances</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>oh posey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17305/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,6109,711520,00.html"&gt;Who&apos;s the Best-Read MeFite?&lt;/a&gt; The 100 best works of fiction (as chosen by Norwegian Book Clubs) (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://archipelapogo.blogspot.com/2002_05_01_archipelapogo_archive.html#76788740&quot;&gt;Archipelapogo&lt;/a&gt; via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rebeccablood.net/archive/2002/05.html#13books&quot;&gt;rebeccablood&lt;/a&gt;). Sure, it&apos;s arbitrary, but there&apos;s a lot of great writing here. Bragging rights awarded (unless someone cares to sweeten the pot). How many have you read?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17305</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2002 10:28:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>100Best</category>
		<category>BestOf</category>
		<category>Books</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>Top100</category>
		<dc:creator>Sean Meade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16619/</link>
		<description> For the first time in forty years, &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=entertainmentnews&amp;StoryID=871582&quot;&gt;there is not a single UK act on the &lt;i&gt;Billboard&lt;/i&gt; top 100 singles chart&lt;/a&gt;. A lot of people argue that it&apos;s because manfactured crap is interchangable, so there&apos;s no need to import it, but plenty of American artists still make it in the UK, so I&apos;m inclined to believe there&apos;s something else at work here. Any ideas as to what that something might be?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16619</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billboard</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>charts</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>popmusic</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12615/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.channel4.com/greatest/"&gt;Channel 4 (in the UK)&apos;s 100 Greatest Films of All Time.&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;i&gt;Star Wars&lt;/i&gt; at Number 1 - it&apos;s a great film, but is it really *that* great?  This is not the only recent poll to place it there.  (Sorry - the link&apos;s a little flaky at the moment - I&apos;m sure they&apos;ll sort it out.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12615</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>100greatest</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>StarWars</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<dc:creator>jonpollard</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


