<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with top500</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/top500</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'top500' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:03:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:03:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>500 Most Influential Rock Songs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29694/500%2DMost%2DInfluential%2DRock%2DSongs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.infoplease.com/ipea/A0150472.html"&gt;Spot The Essential, Seminal, How-Could-These-Imbeciles-Have-Forgotten? Popular Song:&lt;/a&gt; A well-made list, specially if it&apos;s authoritative and includes no less than 500 songs, is just asking to be cruelly inspected for omissions, ridiculed for certain inclusions and generally derided.  This one is, admittedly, a toughy.  But perhaps way too US-centric and too Rockist.  I mean, honestly, sometimes you Yanks act as if you&apos;d invented Pop music! ;) (&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;Via the newly-discovered &lt;b&gt;Rivurcated Bifets&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29694</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:03:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>rockist</category>
		<category>rocknroll</category>
		<category>top100</category>
		<category>top500</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


