<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with traffic and automobiles</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/traffic+automobiles</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'traffic' and 'automobiles' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:46:03 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:46:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Auto safety: Better Red than Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/110452/Auto%2Dsafety%2DBetter%2DRed%2Dthan%2DDead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/11/magazine/stop-sign.html"&gt;The Stop Sign Wasn&#8217;t Always Red.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.n9jig.com/gallery/hwy/yellow.jpg&quot;&gt;Yellow signs&lt;/a&gt; were used before there was a way produce a reflective material in red that would last.
We have the Mississippi Valley Association of State Highway Departments to thank for the stop sign&#8217;s iconic shape. In 1923, the association developed an influential set of recommendations about street-sign shapes whose impact is still felt today. The recommendations were based on a simple, albeit not exactly intuitive, idea: the more sides a sign has, the higher the danger level it invokes. Although all English-speaking and many other countries use the English word stop on stop signs, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_sign#History&quot;&gt;some jurisdictions use an equivalent word in their primary language instead of or in addition to it.&lt;/a&gt;
&quot;Both stop and arr&amp;#0234;t are considered valid French words and the Office qu&amp;#0233;b&amp;#0233;cois de la langue fran&amp;#0231;aise (OQLF) notes that the use of &quot;stop&quot; on stop signs is attested in French since 1927&quot;

What about increasing the vocabulary of road signs?  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.good.is/post/a-new-traffic-sign-take-turns/&quot;&gt;Take Turns sign&lt;/a&gt; has been proposed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ted.com/talks/gary_lauder_s_new_traffic_sign_take_turns.html&quot;&gt;Gary Lauder in this TED talk.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.110452</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:46:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>signs</category>
		<category>stop</category>
		<category>takeTurns</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<dc:creator>Obscure Reference</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Round a about</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35456/Round%2Da%2Dabout</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swindonweb.com/life/lifemagi1.jpg&quot;&gt;These&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swindonweb.com/life/magicsign.jpg&quot;&gt;images&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swindonweb.com/life/magi01.jpg&quot;&gt;caused &lt;/a&gt;a great debate 
among my antipodean circle in London whether they are real or have been 
photoshopped. As far as we can gather it
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swindonweb.com/life/lifemagi0.htm&quot;&gt;does&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armin-grewe.com/holiday/wiltshire/swindon-roundabout.htm&quot;&gt;
exist&lt;/a&gt;. But it is surreal - and only in the UK surely would something like 
this be real.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35456</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:53:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>rotaries</category>
		<category>roundabouts</category>
		<category>signs</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>trafficcircle</category>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Farrow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>London Congestion Charging</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23632/London%2DCongestion%2DCharging</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cclondon.com"&gt;Conjestion charging hits london&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#0163;5 to take a car into the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cclondon.com/WebCenterBrandedTR4/StaticPages/DetailMapCCZ.pdf&quot;&gt;central zone &lt;/a&gt; (pdf)
between 7am and 6.30pm Mon - Fri.

It&apos;s all the work of controversial mayor &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk_politics/2000/london_mayor/736460.stm&quot;&gt;&quot;Red&quot; Ken Livingstone &lt;/a&gt;

Opinion is split: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foe.co.uk/campaigns/transport/news/congestion_charging/&quot;&gt;for&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soduken.co.uk&quot;&gt;against.&lt;/a&gt;

A small majority of Londoners seem in favour of it - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_515495.html&quot;&gt;traffic in London now is as slow as the days of the horse and cart!&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/3420235?source=Evening%20Standard&quot;&gt;Day one seems quiet&lt;/a&gt;, though it is the school holidays!

Is this the answer?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23632</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>charging</category>
		<category>congestion</category>
		<category>fees</category>
		<category>gridlock</category>
		<category>kenlivingstone</category>
		<category>livingstone</category>
		<category>london</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>roads</category>
		<category>rushhour</category>
		<category>tolls</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>usage</category>
		<dc:creator>brettski</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Like some people,</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/697/Like%2Dsome%2Dpeople</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.amasci.com/amateur/traffic/traffic1.html"&gt;Like some people,&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m obsessed with traffic. I was very happy to hear that Toyota is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,34167,00.html&quot;&gt;developing chips to drive smart cars&lt;/a&gt;, since groups of people in cars can&apos;t seem to drive very well on their own. I&apos;ve studied traffic for years (living in LA means lots of &quot;time in the lab&quot;) and have actually tried &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amasci.com/amateur/traffic/trafexp.html&quot;&gt;no-stopping experiments&lt;/a&gt; and observed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amasci.com/amateur/traffic/seatraf.html&quot;&gt;merging behavior&lt;/a&gt;. People seem to use their brakes too much, or over-react to people ahead tapping their brakes. I can&apos;t wait until the day traffic flow can be controlled by computer, LA might be livable again. Just to prove to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewebtoday.com/bloat/&quot;&gt;others&lt;/a&gt; that this is in fact a thinly-veiled simpsons newsgroup, Homer and Bart benefited from similar driving-assistance technology in &lt;a href=&quot;http://x45.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=460232778.1&amp;search=thread&amp;CONTEXT=950081043.1907556384&amp;hitnum=0&quot;&gt;episode #AABF13&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.697</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:02:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>losangeles</category>
		<category>thesimpsons</category>
		<category>toyota</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


