<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with traffic and internet</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/traffic+internet</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'traffic' and 'internet' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:08:07 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:08:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The ODP bans its successful users.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22891/The%2DODP%2Dbans%2Dits%2Dsuccessful%2Dusers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnl.net/where/open/dir.asp_Q_cat_E_/Arts"&gt;The Open Directory Project bans TNL.net&lt;/a&gt; Tristan Louis&apos;s web site can no longer be used to access the Open Directory.  Why? apparently they can&apos;t handle the traffic, so they banned links coming from his pages in the early afternoon.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22891</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:08:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bandwidth</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>OpenDirectory</category>
		<category>TNL</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>TristanLouis</category>
		<dc:creator>clevershark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16108/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microcontentnews.com/entries/20020405-623.htm"&gt;&lt;i&gt;WebLogs bring less traffic than major media sites. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; There isn&apos;t any surprize there, but what &lt;i&gt;kind&lt;/i&gt; of traffic does each bring?&lt;blockquote&gt;...those Google/Scientology articles I wrote didn&apos;t get nearly as many links from blogs... but they were of much broader interest to readers than the blog articles, so when a few major media sites linked to them, they got a ton of traffic.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  Major media sites have to appeal to a common denominator, while smaller sites (MeFi) can focus on quality and thought provoking content.  Is there any wonder there&apos;s less people interested in the specifics?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16108</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 06:22:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<category>webtraffic</category>
		<dc:creator>KnitWit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13061/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.exitblaze.com/index.htm"&gt;A pyramid scheme for web traffic?&lt;/a&gt; ExitBlaze apparently sends traffic from one member&apos;s site to another&apos;s (or, no doubt, to other sites they must sell hits to): &lt;i&gt;Bob doesn&apos;t know it but a pop-underwindow displaying an ExitBlaze member&apos;s site has just shown up underneath the main browser window.&lt;/i&gt; And Bob owes it all to you!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13061</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:43:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ExitBlaze</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>popunder</category>
		<category>pyramidscheme</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>Trafficology</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6058/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washtech.com/news/media/7871-1.html"&gt;AOL Dominates Web Traffic,&lt;/a&gt; according to Jupiter Media Metrix, who found that AOL Time Warner&#8217;s combined share of the time Americans spent online last month was 33(!) percent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6058</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:39:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>webtraffic</category>
		<dc:creator>frednorman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


