<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with transparency and Politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/transparency+Politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'transparency' and 'Politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:35:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:35:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The perils of openness in government</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85745/The%2Dperils%2Dof%2Dopenness%2Din%2Dgovernment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/against-transparency"&gt;Against Transparency.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;How could anyone be against transparency? Its virtues and its utilities seem so crushingly obvious. But I have increasingly come to worry that there is an error at the core of this unquestioned goodness. We are not thinking critically enough about where and when transparency works, and where and when it may lead to confusion, or to worse. And I fear that the inevitable success of this movement--if pursued alone, without any sensitivity to the full complexity of the idea of perfect openness--will inspire not reform, but disgust. The &apos;naked transparency movement,&apos; as I will call it here, is not going to inspire change. It will simply push any faith in our political system over the cliff.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3quarksdaily.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85745</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:35:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Government</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Commence Option 4</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81446/Commence%2DOption%2D4</link>
		<description> Metafilter&apos;s own Sean Tevis made history with his run for Kansas House of Representatives in 2008. Read more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/73366/Information-Design-Politics-WIN-Hopefully&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/76258/One-that-should-have-won-but-didnt&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/79093/AN-ACT-concerning-campaign-finance-pertaining-to-unitemized-contributions&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Sean is back and ready to commence &lt;a href=&quot;http://option4.seantevis.com/index.htm&quot;&gt;&apos;Option 4&apos;&lt;/a&gt;, once again changing the way politics is done in Kansas. From his website &quot;&lt;em&gt;Sean Tevis is visiting more than 50 politicians who can make open government a reality. He wears a different shirt with each politician. Eash shirt is unique and displays the names of 100 people like you. These shirts also have messages on them, which are Twitter-sized: 140 characters or less. The politician receives a copy of this shirt, too, for meeting with Sean. You get an account of this visit.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81446</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Kansas</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Tevis</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<dc:creator>jlowen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The First 100 Days</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78518/The%2DFirst%2D100%2DDays</link>
		<description> Oh those vaunted &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal#The_First_Hundred_Days&quot;&gt;first 100 days&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; they are finally upon us.  Roosevelt&apos;s legendary time period has long been applied to new administrations, but never so emphatically or with such hope as to the Obama administration.  And now you can follow them!  For commentary, there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefirst100days.org/&quot;&gt;The First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;, for mainstream media there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/obama-100-days/&quot;&gt;Obama&apos;s First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;, for a comparison between old and new there &lt;a href=&quot;http://100days.blogs.nytimes.com/&quot;&gt;100 Days: Starting the Job, From FDR to Obam&lt;/a&gt;a, for new media there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/100-days&quot;&gt;Obama&apos;s First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;, and finally, for a government perspective there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.america.gov/campaign/&quot;&gt;First 100 Days&lt;/a&gt;.

I smell an idea for an ironic t-shirt...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78518</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:39:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>100days</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>deal</category>
		<category>fdr</category>
		<category>first100days</category>
		<category>followingobama</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>hundreddays</category>
		<category>new</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>obamaadministration</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>Cochise</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Watch Lists</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69728/Watch%2DLists</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/watchlistcounter.html"&gt;ACLU Watch List Counter:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/34298prs20080227.html&quot;&gt;U.S. Terror List Now Exceeds 900,000 Names&lt;/a&gt;.  That&apos;s an awful lot of terrorists.  More Privacy and Surveillance Filter: Bruce Schneier on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2008/03/securitymatters_0306&quot;&gt;The Myth of the &apos;Transparent Society&apos;&lt;/a&gt;, Glenn Greenwald on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/07/surveillance/index.html&quot;&gt;The Banality of the Surveillance State&lt;/a&gt;, and Stephen Colbert on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/03/07/the-colbert-report-at-treason/&quot;&gt;AT &amp;amp; Treason&lt;/a&gt;. A spokesman for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/counterrorism/tsc.htm&quot;&gt;Terrorist Screening Center&lt;/a&gt; had a response to the ACLU in &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/02/us-terror-watch.html&quot;&gt;a comment at Threat Level&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69728</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:50:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>SecurityTheater</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<category>wendell</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;If you scratch a paranoid, you find a narcissist&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64306/If%2Dyou%2Dscratch%2Da%2Dparanoid%2Dyou%2Dfind%2Da%2Dnarcissist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2172952/entry/2172953/"&gt;What&apos;s the Big Secret?&lt;/a&gt; Four surveillance experts try to figure out what the NSA&apos;s superclassified wiretapping program really is (hint: it may have something to do with &lt;a href=http://www.slate.com/id/2172952/entry/2172970/&gt;the filters&lt;/a&gt;).  They don&apos;t seem to realize that this kind of reckless public discussion means &lt;a href=http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/22/mcconnell-unclassified/&gt;some Americans are going to die&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/&gt;Threat Level&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64306</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Classified</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Secrecy</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>SecurityTheater</category>
		<category>Sousveillance</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<category>Warrantless</category>
		<category>Wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fundrace</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29498/Fundrace</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fundrace.org/index.html"&gt;Fundrace.&lt;/a&gt; Innovative rankings and maps about presidential candidates.  The maps are especially cool.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29498</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:20:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>campaigncontributions</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>opensociety</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<dc:creator>monju_bosatsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8700/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.transparency.org/documents/cpi/2001/cpi2001.html#cpi"&gt;Corruption Perceptions Index 2001 highlights worldwide corruption &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;There is no end in sight to the misuse of power by those in public office - and corruption levels are perceived to be as high as ever in both the developed and developing worlds.&lt;br&gt;
It does not reflect secret payments to finance political campaigns, the complicity of banks in money laundering or bribery by multinational companies. Corruption in the most prosperous countries in the world has many manifestations.&quot;


 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8700</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:13:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<dc:creator>riley370</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


