<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with treaty</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/treaty</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'treaty' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:49:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:49:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A secret treaty is bad news?  I&apos;m shocked!  shocked!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86376/A%2Dsecret%2Dtreaty%2Dis%2Dbad%2Dnews%2DIm%2Dshocked%2Dshocked</link>
		<description> The Obama administration&apos;s proposed internet sections of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement&quot;&gt;Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement&lt;/a&gt; (ACTA) have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Proposed_US_ACTA_multi-lateral_intellectual_property_trade_agreement_(2007)&quot;&gt;leaked&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4510/125/&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; says it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/03/secret-copyright-tre.html&quot;&gt;very bad&lt;/a&gt;. ACTA would force the disastrous U.S. style notice-and-takedown rules upon the other signatories, and create prohibitions on breaking DRM, even when lawful for other purposes.   There are new requirements for ISPs far beyond even the U.S.&apos;s DMCA : ISPs become liable for user contributed content, and must cut off internet access for users accused of infringement. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86376</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:49:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACTA</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<dc:creator>jeffburdges</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cluster bombs banned by over 100 countries</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72066/Cluster%2Dbombs%2Dbanned%2Dby%2Dover%2D100%2Dcountries</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7423714.stm"&gt;More than 100 nations have reached an agreement on a treaty which would ban current designs of cluster bombs.&lt;/a&gt; Naturally, the most militant nations (USA, Russia, China, India, Pakistan) have refused to negotiate (creating significant interoperability issues for allied nations such as the UK to the USA). The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopclustermunitions.org/&quot;&gt;Cluster Munition Coalition&lt;/a&gt; is an excellent resource about the issue. The issue of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/fadt_ctte/completed_inquiries/2004-07/cluster_bill_2006/submissions/sub10.pdf&quot;&gt;interoperability &lt;/a&gt;(.pdf) ensured that Australia remained on the side of the USA in considering this issue. The Australian Democrats proposed the &lt;em&gt;Cluster Munitions (Prohibition) Bill 2006&lt;/em&gt;, which was defeated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/fadt_ctte/completed_inquiries/2004-07/cluster_bill_2006/index.htm&quot;&gt;in Committee&lt;/a&gt; by both major parties. Dissenting report &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/fadt_ctte/completed_inquiries/2004-07/cluster_bill_2006/report/d02.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72066</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>bombs</category>
		<category>civilians</category>
		<category>cluster</category>
		<category>collateral_damage</category>
		<category>dublin</category>
		<category>munitions</category>
		<category>murder</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<dc:creator>wilful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Water is for life.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64755/Water%2Dis%2Dfor%2Dlife</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hesperian.org/assets/environmental/Cholera_EN_pdf.php&quot;&gt;Because water &lt;/a&gt;is a basic need for all life and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hesperian.org/assets/wtnd/WTND_Chapter_5_pdf.php&quot;&gt;good health&lt;/a&gt;, access to enough &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jalmandir.com/&quot;&gt;safe water&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://sitemaker.umich.edu/section9group6/water_scarcity&quot;&gt;water security&lt;/a&gt;, is defined as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.who.int/entity/water_sanitation_health/rtwrev.pdf&quot;&gt;human right by international law.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;small&gt;[mostly pdfs]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64755</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:58:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DrinkingWater</category>
		<category>healing</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HumanRight</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<category>WHO</category>
		<dc:creator>bigmusic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20457/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000006D967.htm"&gt;Quitting Kyoto&lt;/a&gt; Though I too was angry when Bush end gang refused to get involved with Kyoto (environmental treaty), I might have let my ant-Bush feelings take over my &quot;better self.&quot; Here an expert argues that all the world but the EU knows that the Kyoto treaty is worthless.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20457</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:37:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>eu</category>
		<category>green</category>
		<category>kyoto</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<category>worthless</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17589/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel060402.asp"&gt;The New Frontier-&lt;/a&gt; Preparing the law for settling on Mars. &quot;Like the abandoned launch fields [at Cape Canveral], the Outer Space Treaty [of 1967] needs to have its valuable parts salvaged, and the dangerous ones demolished.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17589</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 09:14:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1967</category>
		<category>coldwar</category>
		<category>colonization</category>
		<category>DavidKopel</category>
		<category>GlennReynolds</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Mars</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>nationalappropriation</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>OuterSpaceTreaty</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spacerace</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16088/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60208-2002Apr4.html"&gt;Bush plays peacemaker.  &lt;/a&gt; Having refused to honor several international treaties since taking office, the Bush administration sees itself as a legitimate peace broker.  Opinions solicited, is this likely to improve the situation or cause it to deteriorate further?  


 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16088</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:11:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>treaties</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<dc:creator>jack-o</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15241/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ctbto.org/"&gt;The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty&lt;/a&gt; was in the news 3 and a half years ago when the Senate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/congress/july-dec99/ctbt_10-14a.html&quot;&gt;failed&lt;/a&gt; to ratify a treaty we created. Although there have been no formal talks of ratification since, with all that has been happening &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/03/nuclear.threat/index.html&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/03/01/georgia.putin/index.html&quot;&gt;days&lt;/a&gt;, one can&apos;t help but wonder if now is the time to act. Bush mentioned earlier of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A22393-2002Jan9&quot;&gt;reducing&lt;/a&gt; our nuclear arsenal, but wouldn&apos;t ratification be our best solution to control major threats, such as North Korea, Iraq, and Iran?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15241</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:07:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ctbto</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>testban</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<dc:creator>BlueTrain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9629/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/24/politics/24CND-BUSH.html"&gt;Just a Reminder That The White House is Occupied by a Clueless, Dangerous Man &lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m not sure what to add, except I wish he would just resign.  And that I wish the median national IQ would rise into the low 90&apos;s.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9629</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antiballistic</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>missile</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>russia</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<dc:creator>ParisParamus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7950/</link>
		<description> How to brew up a new cold war: &lt;a href=&quot;http://robots.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/05/28/bush.russia/index.html&quot;&gt;arm up some rivals and burn a treaty in exchange for setting up a global missle defense system&lt;/a&gt;. Can anyone find an upside to this story? Why could this be a good thing for the US and the rest of the world?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7950</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2001 23:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABM</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>missile</category>
		<category>Putin</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Russia</category>
		<category>treaty</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


