Washington salutes its new Blog Overlords
When Trent Lott finally fell from (g)race last friday, the ensuing MeFi thread
discussed how Lott's statements were at first a sleeper in the mainstream media but that the blogosphere forced the story onto the front pages. However, this theory was met with some scepticism
However, the theory of blog ascendancy has legs. In fact, the story is all over the place
With this level of discussion, right or wrong, Blogs just arguably went mainstream. (It might also be the end of our golden era of blogging.)
There are greater and lesser blogs. Its hard to tell which blog deserves the credit for toppling Lott. How will they determine the alpha blog? The winner could be the next "Drudge".
posted by BentPenguin
on Dec 23, 2002 -
Lott Resigns As GOP Leader.
Senator Lott has bowed to internal and external pressure and has resigned his position as Senate majority leader. He will, however, not resign from the Senate altogether. Will Republican be able to recover, or have they been permanently weakened? Will Democrats still be able to capitalize on the scandal?
posted by ncurley
on Dec 20, 2002 -
What the hell?
Republican leader of the Senate, Trent Lott, says that the United States would have been better off if then-segregationist candidate Strom Thurmond had won the presidency in 1948. Wow...I want to hear Fox News, Rush, etc, spin Lott's way out of this. Also, does saying this have anything to do with the election in Louisiana on Saturday?
posted by BarneyFifesBullet
on Dec 6, 2002 -
Republican Insider Hint #1: Apply foot to mouth and win. America ain't no democracy.
Trent Lott on McDermott
: "For him to be in Baghdad, the center of one of the most dangerous dictators in the world, with all kinds
of weapons of mass destruction, to be questioning the veracity of our own American president
, is the height of irresponsible," said Lott, R-Mississippi. "He needs to come home and keep his mouth shut.
" Yes, yes, we have three traitorous democratic congressmen
in Baghdad presently, who are lobbying that government to allow the return of UN weapons inspectors.
posted by crasspastor
on Sep 29, 2002 -
Bush may not need authorization to launch attack against Iraq
(NYTimes, reg req).
Senator Trent Lott, the Republican minority leader, told reporters today that he did not think the administration needed Congressional approval for a major assault. He said that authority had been granted last fall in a resolution supporting military action against Al Qaeda.
"I suspect that Al Qaeda elements are in Iraq," Mr. Lott said. "The resolution we passed, we made it very clear the president has the authority to pursue the Al Qaeda wherever they may be found, in whatever country, which could very well include Iraq."
Hello? Article I, Section 8, Clause 11
? War Powers Act Section 5b
? I know they gave GWB the right to go after Al-Qaeda, but this is ridiculous. Should we deport one of our prisoners from Guantanamo to the next country that we want to make some changes in? Sheesh. You want to go to war? Fine by me - but do it Constitutionally.
posted by rshah21
on Aug 1, 2002 -