<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with uk and media</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/uk+media</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'uk' and 'media' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:00:54 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:00:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Murdoch v. the BBC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84662/Murdoch%2Dv%2Dthe%2DBBC</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/30/robert-peston-james-murdoch-bbc"&gt;&quot;If you think you can get fucking angry, I can get fucking angry.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; James Murdoch, Chairman of News Corp, gave this year&apos;s MacTaggart Lecture &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2009/aug/29/james-murdoch-edinburgh-festival-mactaggart&quot;&gt;(vid)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/comment/james-murdochs-mactaggart-speech/5004990.article&quot;&gt;(transcript)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; in which he delivered a broadside on the role of the BBC, accusing it of &apos;dumping&apos; news on the commercial market.  An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/08/what_future_for_media_and_jour.html&quot;&gt;alternative view was given by the BBC&apos;s Robert Peston,&lt;/a&gt; who asked &quot;Should we be relaxed if &apos;can&apos;t pay&apos; means &apos;can&apos;t know&apos;?&quot; Their after-dinner discussions led to a &apos;vigorous exchange of views.&apos;

There was a &lt;a href=&quot;bbc%20http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/6111007/James-Murdoch-doesnt-go-far-enough-slash-the-BBCs-budget-by-a-third.html&quot;&gt;mixed &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/aug/31/charging-for-content-bbc&quot;&gt;reception &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b788da8c-95c4-11de-90e0-00144feabdc0.html&quot;&gt;to the speech&lt;/a&gt; in the UK media, and even The Wire&apos;s dominic West &lt;a href=&quot;http://deadlinescotland.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/9104-1726/&quot;&gt;got in on the act.&lt;/a&gt;

Previous MacTaggart speakers include &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-790841440769145720&quot;&gt;Dennis Potter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1561287/In-full-Jeremy-Paxmans-MacTaggart-Lecture.html&quot;&gt;Jeremy Paxman,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/aug/22/edinburghtvfestival2005.bbc&quot;&gt;amongst &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mgeitf.co.uk/home/thefestival/about-the-festival.aspx/past_mactaggart_lecture_speakers&quot;&gt;others.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84662</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:00:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>lecture</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>newscorp</category>
		<category>peston</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Jakey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Dark Arts of Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83119/The%2DDark%2DArts%2Dof%2DJournalism</link>
		<description> An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/jul/09/murdoch-papers-phone-hacking&quot;&gt;investigation &lt;/a&gt;by the &lt;em&gt;Guardian&lt;/em&gt; newspaper has uncovered a trail of hacking and other illegal &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21E0EwXWiAM#t=1m18s&quot;&gt;Dark Arts&lt;/a&gt;&quot; at the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/jul/08/hacking-privacy-news-of-the-world&quot;&gt;News of the World&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. Rupert Murdoch, the paper&apos;s owner, is reported to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/murdoch-papers-phone-hacking&quot;&gt;shelled out over &amp;#0163;1m&lt;/a&gt; in out of court settlements The phones of celebrities and politicians are said to have been bugged, and the trail even leads as far as David Cameron&apos;s chief press adviser and former-editor of the NotW, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/andy-coulson-profile&quot;&gt;Andy Coulson&lt;/a&gt;. Another ex-Murdoch editor, Andrew Neil, has said the scandal represented one of the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/09/andrew-neil-murdoch-andy-coulson&quot;&gt;most significant media stories of modern times&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.

It is not the first time such practices have been revealed, however. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/apr/15/sundaymirror.mailonsunday&quot;&gt;In 2005&lt;/a&gt;, private investigator Stephen Whittamore was arrested for buying private information from the police national computer, leading to an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/dec/14/dailymail.pressandpublishing&quot;&gt;investigation &lt;/a&gt;by the information commissioner.

Guardian journalist Nick Davies provides a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/murdoch-newspapers-phone-hacking&quot;&gt;bit of background&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83119</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>darkarts</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newsoftheworld</category>
		<category>scandal</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Acey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who is Daniel Hannan?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80312/Who%2Dis%2DDaniel%2DHannan</link>
		<description> On Tuesday, Conservative MEP &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Hannan&quot;&gt;Daniel Hannan&lt;/a&gt; took the opportunity to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs&quot;&gt;&quot;skewer&quot; Gordon Brown&lt;/a&gt; in the kind of biting rhetoric rarely, if ever, seen in UK parliament. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/Daniel_Hannan&quot;&gt;Despite having alerted UK press organisations, including his own part-time employer&lt;/a&gt;, Hannan&apos;s speech was not picked up by the UK press until... it started getting a heavy push from &lt;a href=&quot;http://technorati.com/search/daniel+hannan?language=n&quot;&gt;the US&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/26/daniel-hannan-the-new-tory-saviour/&quot;&gt;punditocracy&lt;/a&gt;. Now picked up by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1165007/DANIEL-HANNAN-MEP-Read-tirade-Gordon-Brown-thats-huge-hit-YouTube.html?ITO=1490&quot;&gt;right wing media in the UK&lt;/a&gt;, Hannan is being held up, not only as an example of a young thrusting truth teller, but prime evidence of the kind of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_bias_in_the_United_States&quot;&gt;liberal media &lt;/a&gt;US pundits have talked about for years. Perhaps it is, or perhaps his popularity in the US is simply retribution for the groundswell of support shown on the east side of the Atlantic for Obama. Nonetheless, it raises the question about whether this is the defining moment when foreign blogs - or the internets - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3473051/can-the-internet-turn-dan-hannans-skewering-of-brown-into-a-story.thtml&quot;&gt;started setting the agenda in the UK&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80312</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:42:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brown</category>
		<category>Daniel</category>
		<category>Drudge</category>
		<category>Gordon</category>
		<category>Hannan</category>
		<category>Limbaugh</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>parliament</category>
		<category>Tube</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>You</category>
		<dc:creator>MuffinMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The worst face of intellectualism: the bluestocking</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79443/The%2Dworst%2Dface%2Dof%2Dintellectualism%2Dthe%2Dbluestocking</link>
		<description> On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/feb/22/university-challenge-trimble&quot;&gt;British TV&lt;/a&gt; last night, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classics.ox.ac.uk/admissions/profiles/gail.asp&quot;&gt;Gail Trimble&lt;/a&gt;, a Classics scholar at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, singlehandedly &lt;a href=&quot;http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/article5793104.ece&quot;&gt;trounced&lt;/a&gt; the opposing team in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_Challenge&quot;&gt;University Challenge&lt;/a&gt;. To some a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tvscoop.tv/2008/12/random_hate_som.html&quot;&gt;smug&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/article2262112.ece?OTC-RSS&amp;ATTR=TV&quot;&gt;bluestocking&lt;/a&gt; know-it-all, to others a &lt;a href=&quot;http://timesonline.typepad.com/dons_life/2009/02/in-praise-of-ga.html&quot;&gt;role model&lt;/a&gt;. Cue the fightback and lots of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1153665/HARRY-MOUNT-Why-love-Jade-vilify-University-Challenge-brainbox.html&quot;&gt;questions&lt;/a&gt; about whether we, as a society, actually like really clever people and specifically, clever &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theantiroom.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/gail-trimble-cleverness-aesthetics-and-sexism/&quot;&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;?.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79443</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:44:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Classics</category>
		<category>Gail</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Oxford</category>
		<category>Trimble</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>University</category>
		<dc:creator>MuffinMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can the BBC survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78682/Can%2Dthe%2DBBC%2Dsurvive</link>
		<description> A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/bias_at_the_bbc.html&quot;&gt;biased&lt;/a&gt; shadow of its &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/526855.stm&quot;&gt;former self&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/aug/18/bbc.television3&quot;&gt;waste of money&lt;/a&gt; dominated by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2267125.ece&quot;&gt;champagne socialists&lt;/a&gt;, a victim of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/10/ofcom_psb_review/&quot;&gt;media fragmentation&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;aid=9307&quot;&gt;political&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbcwatch.com&quot;&gt;pawn&lt;/a&gt; or still the &lt;a href=&quot;http://interjunction.org/news/in-these-terrible-times-britons-trust-beeb-best/&quot;&gt;trusted heart&lt;/a&gt; of the UK&apos;s (and, arguably, the world&apos;s) broadcasting world? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/mar/18/broadcasting.bbc&quot;&gt;scandal&lt;/a&gt; after &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7696753.stm&quot;&gt;scandal&lt;/a&gt; threatens to undermine confidence in the BBC and the voices calling for the dissolution of the licence fee gain a more &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/wire/4123&quot;&gt;cohesive platform&lt;/a&gt;, can the BBC survive, - is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12998141&quot;&gt;the solution or the problem&lt;/a&gt;, and can the British public really afford to let it die the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/transcript_fry.shtml&quot;&gt;death of a thousand cuts&lt;/a&gt;?

On the day after the BBC announces it will put every UK &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/arts_and_culture/7856179.stm&quot;&gt;publically owned oil painting online&lt;/a&gt; and the Director General talks about the BBC&apos;s &quot;special responsibility&quot; to culture in the UK, what should the role of the BBC be and, perhaps more importantly, what should it cost?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78682</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:27:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>broadcasting</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>MuffinMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Today&apos;s Adventures of Spinspin: Alistair Campbell&apos;s media whirlwind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62844/Todays%2DAdventures%2Dof%2DSpinspin%2DAlistair%2DCampbells%2Dmedia%2Dwhirlwind</link>
		<description> Tony Blair&apos;s ex-Master of Spin and closest adviser is on a media whirlwind promoting his diary. Campbell&apos;s apparently straight talking nature gives the prospects of some tantalizing insight into the inner workings of number 10 for the majority of Blair&apos;s premiership. He&apos;s not getting it all his own way, though. BBC Radio 4&apos;s John Humphrey&apos;s on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/&quot;&gt;Today Programme&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/audio/0810_20070709.ram&quot;&gt;Real audio&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;a href=&quot;http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rmhttp/downloadtrial/radio4/today/today_20070709-0900_40_st.mp3&quot;&gt;MP3&lt;/a&gt;) was more interested in the failings of a government and political movement for which he was an architect and key player, and particularly Campbell&apos;s legacy of elevating the role of spin in British politics, even in the inner working of government, allegedly sexing up an intelligence dossier in order to make a more compelling case for war in Iraq (&lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/story/0,,1050931,00.html&quot;&gt;See 10 ways to sex up a dossier&lt;/a&gt;). The Guardian, in an article titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/media/story/0,,2122640,00.html&quot;&gt;Did he mean me?&lt;/a&gt;, invited some of those named in his diaries to give feedback, or should that be biteback?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62844</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alistaircampbell</category>
		<category>diary</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>tonyblair</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>nthdegx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Unpopular premier slams popular press</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62007/Unpopular%2Dpremier%2Dslams%2Dpopular%2Dpress</link>
		<description> The UK media is like a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6744261.stm&quot;&gt;&quot;Feral Beast&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, and is undermining Britain, says Tony Blair. Simon Kelner, editor of The Independent, &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,2101196,00.html&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/gallery/2007/jun/12/1?picture=330015020&quot;&gt;Some reasons why Blair might not be too keen on the press&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:19:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Feral</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Media</category>
		<category>Newspapers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>TonyBlair</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Toob to Beeb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56382/Toob%2Dto%2DBeeb</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&quot;I feel guilty because I have friends that are working really hard to get into television or acting and I&apos;m just sitting here having not done anything more than enjoy playing with gadgets.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Susi Weaser (24) makes little &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hje_9GgkXQk&amp;mode=related&amp;search=&quot;&gt;one-minute gadget reviews&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=shinymedia&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt; them on YouTube . The BBC must have liked them - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=416765&amp;in_page_id=1770&quot;&gt;because&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6157948.stm&quot;&gt;they&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2006/11/susi_weaser_is.html&quot;&gt;hired&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shinymedia.com/2006/10/from_youtube_to.html&quot;&gt;her&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56382</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:38:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>gadgets</category>
		<category>greatbritain</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mybigbreak</category>
		<category>susiweaser</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Don&apos;t Bomb Us.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47007/Dont%2DBomb%2DUs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/"&gt;Don&apos;t Bomb Us.&lt;/a&gt; In response to credible reports that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16397937&amp;amp;method=full&amp;amp;siteid=94762&amp;amp;headline=exclusive--bush-plot-to-bomb-his-arab-ally-name_page.html&quot;&gt;Bush wanted to bomb al-Jazeera&apos;s HQ in allied Qatar&lt;/a&gt; (discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46896&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46967&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; on MeFi), Al Jazeera staffers start their own English-language blog. Their site contains remembrances of their &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/tayseer-allouni-colleague-friend-and.html&quot;&gt;fallen colleagues&lt;/a&gt;, firsthand &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/that-dreadful-night-in-bagdad.html&quot;&gt;accounts of US attacks&lt;/a&gt; on their offices, links to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051212/scahill&quot;&gt;relevant&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=1198&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level.php?cat=CultureAndMedia&amp;amp;loid=8.0.232620063&amp;amp;par=&quot;&gt;controversy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/23885066@N00/&quot;&gt;Flickr photosets&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/23885066@N00/sets/1442137/&quot;&gt;protests calling for an official investigation&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/07256105-B2FC-439A-B255-D830BB238EA1.htm&quot;&gt;al Jazeera&apos;s code of ethics&lt;/a&gt;. Also, a quick note to Tony Blair: &quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/mr-blair-will-you-take-our-call.html&quot;&gt;P.S. Thanks for talking Mr. Bush out of bombing our offices!&lt;/a&gt;&quot; Not surprisingly, their blog is generating &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/that-dreadful-night-in-bagdad.html#c113289154945221855&quot;&gt;some comments&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47007</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:59:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>al-Jazeera</category>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Qatar</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>UnitedKingdom</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>edverb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fighting the Liberal Media Bias</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46896/Fighting%2Dthe%2DLiberal%2DMedia%2DBias</link>
		<description> In 2001 America &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1654107.stm&quot;&gt;destroyed &lt;/a&gt;the Kabul offices of al-Jazeera with two smartbombs; officials said it was an accident. In 2003 America &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2928153.stm&quot;&gt;destroyed&lt;/a&gt; the Baghdad offices of al-Jazeera with missiles; officials said it was an accident. Now, two British civil servants are on trial for leaking a memo revealing that Bush intended to bomb al-Jazeera...&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16397937&amp;method=full&amp;siteid=94762&amp;headline=exclusive--bush-plot-to-bomb-his-arab-ally-name_page.html&quot;&gt; at their headquarters in allied Qatar&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46896</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:28:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Qatar</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>UnitedKingdom</category>
		<category>UnitedStatesOfAmerica</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s a basic irony, folks...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41735/Its%2Da%2Dbasic%2Dirony%2Dfolks</link>
		<description> I&apos;m amused by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,31-2005200954,00.html&quot;&gt;today&apos;s Editorial in The Sun&lt;/a&gt;. It starts off with how a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,19809-1595686,00.html&quot;&gt;protest vote against Labour&lt;/a&gt; may mean &apos;you could be signing a young person&apos;s death warrant&apos; due to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/quote.jsp?id=84&quot;&gt;Liberal Democrat party&apos;s drugs policy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second half of the newspaper&apos;s editorial is a tribute to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4505047.stm&quot;&gt;Anthony Wakefield&lt;/a&gt;... whose death came, of course, as part of the Blair government&apos;s war in Iraq... a basic irony that the newspaper has failed to pick up on. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2005/05/desperate.asp&quot;&gt;Bloggerheads&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those who don&apos;t know, The Sun - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3255626a12,00.html&quot;&gt;which backs Blair&lt;/a&gt;, though not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.backingblair.co.uk&quot;&gt;like this&lt;/a&gt; - is the UK&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netimperative.com/2004/09/13/Online_readers_Sun&quot;&gt;biggest selling newspaper&lt;/a&gt; and is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41735</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 22:04:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>tapeguy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...and a robber button is?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41040/and%2Da%2Drobber%2Dbutton%2Dis</link>
		<description> &quot;Before, during and after the upcoming [United Kingdom] general election campaign, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/&quot;&gt;Channel 4 FactCheck&lt;/a&gt; will provide the most reliable analysis of what the political parties and their leaders are saying. The site will scrutinise interviews, speeches and manifesto pledges - informing public debate by creating a popular resource for an information-hungry electorate.&quot; A UK cousin to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/&quot;&gt;FactCheck.org&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41040</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:14:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>scrutiny</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>nthdegx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Clueless About History</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32231/Clueless%2DAbout%2DHistory</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13047091,00.html"&gt;Clueless about History&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Britain is a nation of history dunces with many even believing Adolf Hitler never existed, according to a new survey.
A quarter of those interviewed were not sure if the Battle of Trafalgar was a real historic event, while one in seven did not know the Battle of Hastings really took place.&lt;/em&gt;  Sadly, it gets worse.  Apparently the Battle of Endor actually happened in some people&apos;s minds.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32231</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:13:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clueless</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>ignorance</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>SkyNews</category>
		<category>survery</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Coop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fake celebrity gossip in UK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22759/Fake%2Dcelebrity%2Dgossip%2Din%2DUK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,665618,00.html"&gt;As our own Royal Family slams them,&lt;/a&gt; can we be certain of anything reported in the British press? Celebrity gossip is king: if an unpopular public figure isn&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/533218.stm&quot;&gt;ruined&lt;/a&gt;, then they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/1977982.stm&quot;&gt;dragged through the gutter&lt;/a&gt; by an amoral PR guru. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dotmusic.com/news/January2003/news27804.asp&quot;&gt;Celebrities&lt;/a&gt; mysteriously go out with other celebrities, until their single &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/2138478.stm&quot;&gt;reaches number one&lt;/a&gt; (usually they&apos;re with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freudcommunications.com/&quot;&gt;same PR company&lt;/a&gt;). It happens &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/863160.stm&quot;&gt;all&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/1316413.stm&quot;&gt;time&lt;/a&gt;. And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jordanfanclub.co.uk/&quot;&gt;models&lt;/a&gt; have sex videos &apos;stolen&apos;, only for one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sundaysport.com&quot;&gt;newpaper&lt;/a&gt; to &apos;find&apos; out and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jordanhardcore.co.uk/&quot;&gt;charge people to look&lt;/a&gt; (and trailers suddenly appear on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kazaa.com&quot;&gt;Kazaa&lt;/a&gt;). Is nothing real?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22759</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:03:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>celebrities</category>
		<category>fake</category>
		<category>gossip</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>tabloids</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>wibbler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17895/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.co.uk/magazine/story/0,11913,738196,00.html"&gt;British papers&lt;/a&gt; seem to be the only place we can find out what goes on in the US these days.  Probably has to do with the liberal media, wouldn&apos;t you say?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17895</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:44:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>british</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4610/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=http://www.quintessentially.com/&gt;Quintessentially.com&lt;/a&gt; is the most horrifying thing I have seen for a long time.  It&#8217;s a members-only club for the &lt;a href=http://www.tatler.co.uk/&gt;Tatler&lt;/a&gt;-reading classes &#8211; people for whom the &lt;a href=http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/&gt;Sunday Times&lt;/a&gt; is a serious newspaper.  Dare you delve into the invidious &lt;a href=http://www.quintessentially.com/guest/benefits/ &gt;&#8216;benefits&#8217;&lt;/a&gt; conferred by membership of this club (&#8216;&lt;a href=http://www.quintessentially.com/guest/benefits/benefits_clubs_gyms_and_spas/&gt;Quintessentially members will have very special treatment&lt;/a&gt;&#8217;!), or gaze upon the faces of the well-heeled &lt;a href=http://www.quintessentially.com/guest/meet_the_staff/editorial_team/&gt;sloanes&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.quintessentially.com/guest/meet_the_staff/advisory_board/&gt;berties&lt;/a&gt; behind it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4610</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2000 04:47:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>club</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>membership</category>
		<category>MembersOnly</category>
		<category>Quintessentially</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Mocata</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2370/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/11803.html"&gt;This story of a whiz kid who vanished&lt;/a&gt;  raises all kinds of questions. Sufiah, a 15-year-old student at Oxford University, disappears; then, her father receives an e-mail, supposedly from her. &lt;i&gt;The e-mail&lt;/i&gt; claims that she ran away from her father&apos;s abusive high-pressure learning techniques; &lt;i&gt;the father&lt;/i&gt; claims that she must have been kidnapped and brainwashed. The police aren&apos;t sure how to handle this situation, as there&apos;s no way to &lt;i&gt;prove&lt;/i&gt; that the mail is really from the daughter. Finally, the father has called in the media to present &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; side of the story, since Sufiah has threatened to go to the media with hers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2370</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:12:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>daugther</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>father</category>
		<category>kidnapping</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Oxford</category>
		<category>runaway</category>
		<category>Sufiah</category>
		<category>teenagers</category>
		<category>TheRegister</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>whizkid</category>
		<dc:creator>harmful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


