Beyond boxers or briefs: Undergarments vary much more than the current styles we find in the nearest
haberdashery department or at
Victoria's Secret. Mormons have the
temple garment.
Suffragettes invented
bloomers, the next bold step after
pantaloons. But throughout modern Western history, women tended to wear
dress-like undergarments, (with or
without accompanying drawers) though both 19th century
men and
women wore the union suit, an earlier type of long-johns.
Of course, there's always the earliest of them all, the loincloth, worn by the ancient
Egyptians and
Tarzan. Similar is the
malo worn by some Pacific Islanders, the
Japanese fundoshi (warning: excess of manflesh), and the more elaborate Indian
dhoti, the male companion to the sari.
And we mustn't forget the bra! Though not a lower-body garment, it has had a long--if
tumultuous--
history worthy of quick
mention.
posted by lychee
on Jan 30, 2005 -
9 comments
Disney cast members no longer have to wear dirty underwear. Apparently those Mickey and Goofy suits come complete with a set of undergarments that the employee had to wear, and turn in at the end of the day to be laundered -- that was the plan, anyway. Turns out those undergarments weren't being washed thoroughly. "Some workers had complained about getting pubic lice and scabies. 'Things have been passed around,' said Gary Steverson, a stilt walker at Animal Kingdom. 'I know I don't want to share my tights and I don't want to share my underwear.'"
posted by RylandDotNet
on Jun 7, 2001 -
13 comments