<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with unfavorable</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/unfavorable/rss</link>
	<description>tag posts with unfavorable</description>
		  <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:19:31 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:19:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Now that&apos;s a pan!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38191/Now-thats-a-pan</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://newyorker.com/printable/?critics/050103crci_cinema"&gt;And so it came about, this week, that I gazed at a black screen and saw words so calamitous that they might have been written in my own blood: Screenplay by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Joel Schumacher.&lt;/a&gt; Anthony Lane reviews &quot;The Phantom of the Opera&quot; in the current New Yorker.  Now THAT&apos;S how you pan a movie! Does anyone have any other favorite un-favorable reviews?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.38191</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:19:31 -0800</pubDate>

<category>phantomoftheopera</category>

<category>movie</category>

<category>review</category>

<category>unfavorable</category>

<dc:creator>GriffX</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


