<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with unitedstates and constitution</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/unitedstates+constitution</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'unitedstates' and 'constitution' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:25:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:25:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Maryland joins the ranks of states attempting to thwart the electoral college.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59864/Maryland%2Djoins%2Dthe%2Dranks%2Dof%2Dstates%2Dattempting%2Dto%2Dthwart%2Dthe%2Delectoral%2Dcollege</link>
		<description> Maryland &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/&quot; title=&quot;National Popular Vote Inc. is a 501(c)(4) non-profit corporation whose specific purpose is to study, analyze and educate the public regarding its proposal to implement a nationwide popular election of the President of the United States.&quot;&gt;joins the ranks of states&lt;/a&gt; attempting to thwart the electoral college.  Maryland&apos;s General Assembly &lt;a href=&quot;http://mlis.state.md.us/2007RS/bills/sb/sb0634t.pdf&quot; title=&quot;PDF of the bill&quot;&gt;approved a bill&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] to ignore the U.S. Electoral College [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/index.html&quot;&gt;official website&lt;/a&gt;] in presidential elections, instead awarding the state&apos;s 10 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/03/maryland-senate-votes-to-bypass.php&quot; title=&quot;The Jurist&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/52529/A-backdoor-plan-to-thwart-the-electoral-college&quot; title=&quot;June 24, 2006&quot;&gt;previously on MeFi&lt;/a&gt; | more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59864</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:25:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arkansas</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>electoralcollege</category>
		<category>maryland</category>
		<category>reform</category>
		<category>UnitedStates</category>
		<dc:creator>terrapin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush calls for same-sex marriage-ban amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31387/Bush%2Dcalls%2Dfor%2Dsamesex%2Dmarriageban%2Damendment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/24/elec04.prez.bush.marriage/index.html"&gt;Bush calls for same-sex marriage-ban amendment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Pres. Bush&lt;/strong&gt; called for a constitutional amendment against gay marriage today, blaming &quot;activist judges&quot;, the Massachusettes Supreme Court, and the mayor of San Francisco, among others, for attempting &quot;to change the most fundamental institution of civilization.&quot;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How this call for an amendment plays out &lt;em&gt;remains to be seen&lt;/em&gt;, but Bush is taking a strong stance on this issue, in what some see as another &apos;big headline&apos; proposal during the election season. What will this mean for the civil rights of homosexuals in this country? And how will voters react in November?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31387</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:51:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendments</category>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>constitutional</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>homosexual</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>samesexmarriage</category>
		<category>samesexmarriageban</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>nyukid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A More Perfect Union</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28362/A%2DMore%2DPerfect%2DUnion</link>
		<description> 216 years ago today, the constitution of the United States was signed with &quot;Unanimous Consent&quot;* from the thirteen states. In the years since, many have used the other writings of those governmental framers to interpret the constitution. To make that task easier, the University of Chicago Press offers &lt;a href=&quot;http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/&quot;&gt;The Framer&apos;s Constitution&lt;/a&gt;, an exhaustively annotated document that includes not just references to those other writings, but the complete texts as well. The print version is 3200 pages and costs a pretty penny, but thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertyfund.org/&quot;&gt;the Liberty Fund&lt;/a&gt;, you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/tocs/toc.html&quot;&gt;access it on-line&lt;/a&gt; for free.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28362</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>framers</category>
		<category>libertyfund</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>universityofchicagopress</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>ewagoner</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Circuit Court Refuses to Hear Allegiance Case</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23948/Circuit%2DCourt%2DRefuses%2Dto%2DHear%2DAllegiance%2DCase</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,267702,00.html"&gt;Michael Newdow&lt;/a&gt; is probably smiling today.  The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals  has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/28/pledge.of.allegiance.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;refused to reconsider&lt;/a&gt; last June&apos;s ruling finding the Pledge of Allegiance to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/18074&quot;&gt;unconstitutional&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23948</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:30:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>appeals</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>michaelnewdow</category>
		<category>newdow</category>
		<category>pledgeofallegiance</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>mrbula</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18694/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/2507FB5DDCB94D7088256C000051F3B8/$file/9856453.pdf?openelement"&gt;&quot;If this were a sci-fi melodrama, it might be called Speech-Zilla meets Trademark Kong. ... The parties are advised to chill.&quot; (PDF file)&lt;/a&gt; The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is at it again. Aqua&apos;s hit song &quot;Barbie Girl&quot; is judged not to be a violation of Mattel&apos;s trademark, but to be a parody protected by free speech. And all laboured judgely joshing aside, the decision offers a nice summary of trademark law.  Get a plain HTML news story from CNN &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/07/25/barbie.reut/index.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. (The chorus is running through your brain now, right? And it&apos;s going to be there all day, too. *snicker*)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18694</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>appeals</category>
		<category>aqua</category>
		<category>barbie</category>
		<category>barbiegirl</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>mattel</category>
		<category>ninthcircuit</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<dc:creator>maudlin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


