<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with universe and bigbang</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/universe+bigbang</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'universe' and 'bigbang' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Dark Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75164/Dark%2DFlow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html"&gt;Mysterious New &apos;Dark Flow&apos; Discovered in Space.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren&apos;t vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered. Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can&apos;t be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2008/dark_flow.html&quot;&gt;Astronomers are calling the phenomenon &apos;dark flow.&apos;&lt;/a&gt; The stuff that&apos;s pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.&quot; Here&apos;s the paper (subscription required): &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/592947&quot;&gt;A Measurement of Large-Scale Peculiar Velocities of Clusters of Galaxies: Results and Cosmological Implications&lt;/a&gt;. 

NASA has preprints you can download: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/pdf/276176main_ApJLetters_20Oct2008.pdf&quot;&gt;results and implications&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/pdf/276175main_ApJ_inpress.pdf&quot;&gt;technical details&lt;/a&gt; (PDFs). </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75164</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Astronomy</category>
		<category>Astrophysics</category>
		<category>BigBang</category>
		<category>DarkFlow</category>
		<category>Gravity</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>Pook</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Space</category>
		<category>Universe</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Universe is Finite</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63487/The%2DUniverse%2Dis%2DFinite</link>
		<description> Remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Welcome.html&quot;&gt;CERN&lt;/a&gt; from The Da Vinci Code?  And their mega-project the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/&quot;&gt;Large&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider&quot;&gt;Hadron Collider&lt;/a&gt;(previously mentioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/60490/The-dark-energy-backlash&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;?)  This BBC Horizons show, &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6454521153918323669&quot;&gt;The Six Billion Dollar Experiment&lt;/a&gt;, does a good job illustrating why such an experiment is so cool, important and fascinating.  Apparently, the universe is finite.
 

(Includes Google Video-last link)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63487</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:52:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbchorizon</category>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>CERN</category>
		<category>particlephysics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>snsranch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Big Hum</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55313/The%2DBig%2DHum</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.washington.edu/jcramer/BigBang/BBSnd100.wav&quot;&gt;The sound of the Universe being born&lt;/a&gt;. University of Washington &lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.washington.edu/jcramer/&quot;&gt;professor&lt;/a&gt; calculates the frequencies of sound waves propagating through the Universe during its first 760,000 years by analyzing small differences in sky temperature. More information &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4320&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.washington.edu/jcramer/BBSound.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55313</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:39:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>bigbangsound</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>zaebiz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What we need more of is science.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41918/What%2Dwe%2Dneed%2Dmore%2Dof%2Dis%2Dscience</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/&quot; title=&quot;They were too lazy to work an &apos;O&apos; in&quot;&gt;PHENIX&lt;/a&gt; (Pioneering High Energy Nuclear Interaction eXperiment) collaboration hopes to study a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fsu.edu/news/2005/05/04/universe.origin/&quot;&gt;new state of matter&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.physorg.com/news3777.html&quot;&gt;quark-gluon plasma&lt;/a&gt;, which they think was present in the first microseconds after the Big Bang. And they have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/phenix/WWW/intro/rhiclets/index.html&quot;&gt;games!&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41918</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 10:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>phenix</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>goatdog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The truth behind the first cheesy special effects</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39876/The%2Dtruth%2Dbehind%2Dthe%2Dfirst%2Dcheesy%2Dspecial%2Deffects</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&amp;amp;colID=1&amp;amp;articleID=0009F0CA-C523-1213-852383414B7F0147"&gt;Misconceptions about the Big Bang&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39876</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:57:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>cosmology</category>
		<category>creation</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I can see my house from here</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24006/I%2Dcan%2Dsee%2Dmy%2Dhouse%2Dfrom%2Dhere</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2814947.stm"&gt;Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation&lt;/a&gt; gives a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/03/cmb/img/cmb_popup.jpg&quot;&gt;map&lt;/a&gt; of the curiously unsymmetrical early universe.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24006</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 09:37:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigBang</category>
		<category>CosmicMicrowaveBackground</category>
		<category>photos</category>
		<category>radiation</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The oldest light in the cosmos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23492/The%2Doldest%2Dlight%2Din%2Dthe%2Dcosmos</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_or/PresseRelease2_03.html&quot;&gt;BAM!&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov&quot;&gt;Microwave Anisotropy Probe&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s long-awaited &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html&quot;&gt;map&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://background.uchicago.edu/~whu/beginners/introduction.html&quot;&gt;afterglow of the big bang&lt;/a&gt; was released today, and all of a sudden, most of the uncertainty in the concordance model of cosmology has disappeared. We now know, to within 1%, that the universe is 13.7 billion years old. We now know that Hubble constant is 71, plus or minus 4. And though the results agreed stunningly well with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_content.html&quot;&gt;weird picture&lt;/a&gt; that cosmologists have about the nature of the cosmos, there was one surprise -- the first stars were born way before expected. Great day for science, and a likely future Nobel.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23492</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>bam</category>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>ptermit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7336/</link>
		<description> Oh sure, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/30/science/30COSM.html&quot;&gt;once again, this &quot;theory&quot; proves nothing&lt;/a&gt;. Nothing more than another failed attempt to dismiss God&apos;s work. When are these morons, with such an imagination, ever going to admit it, that their theory is nothing more than that. I could ramble on and on like these suppose &quot;scientists&quot; about nothing, and make all these supposed &quot;patterns&quot;, milarky, lies, and made up falsehoods on how the universe was just made from some wild explosion. Oh sure, that is how it was made.....just some big bang, then the next thing you know, man walked out of the swamp, got in his Mercedes, and drove away....haha

Just keep on believing such crap about this big bang &quot;theory&quot;. But just like before, this will fail again and prove that God did create the world, and he has been, is, and always will be the creator, not the &quot;big banger&quot;. And that is a FACT, not a &quot;theory&quot;.....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7336</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2001 05:29:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigBang</category>
		<category>Creation</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Origin</category>
		<category>TinyHum</category>
		<category>Universe</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1924/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp"&gt;The Big Re-run?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In the first millionth of a second after the universe&#8217;s
beginning, the entire cosmos consisted of this ultradense,
ultrahot brew, scientists say.&quot;  And now scientists are trying to re-enact the Big Bang.  Too big of a task to take on?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1924</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 10:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>planets</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>Zosia Blue</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


