<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with us and constitution</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/us+constitution</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'us' and 'constitution' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:04:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:04:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Don&apos;t Ask, Don&apos;t Tell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82350/Dont%2DAsk%2DDont%2DTell</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/06/09/opinion/1194840804819/op-ed-a-gay-soldier-s-husband.html"&gt;A Gay Soldier&apos;s Husband&lt;/a&gt; &#8212; In the backdrop of the conservative activist Supreme Court&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2009316193_scotus09.html&quot;&gt;recent decision against hearing a challenge&lt;/a&gt; to the US military&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don&apos;t_ask,_don&apos;t_tell&quot;&gt;&quot;Don&apos;t Ask, Don&apos;t Tell&quot;&lt;/a&gt; policy, one gay American relates the difficulties he faces having a partner on active duty in Iraq. In Iraq itself, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&amp;sc=&amp;sc2=news&amp;sc3=&amp;id=91976&quot;&gt;death squads&lt;/a&gt; continue to murder gay and lesbian Iraqis, while American occupying forces look the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&amp;sc=&amp;sc2=&amp;sc3=&amp;id=92274&quot;&gt;other way&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82350</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>equalprotection</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Audacity of Government</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70455/The%2DAudacity%2Dof%2DGovernment</link>
		<description> A very special &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?sched=1236&quot;&gt;This American Life&lt;/a&gt;&apos; about an administration with the endemic belief that laws only apply to the little people, and a limitless refusal to concede on even petty issues, no matter the costs. The highlight is about immigrant widows of US citizens (30:50). The program also discusses the constitutional beliefs of the presidential candidates. Bonus post: Expecting a tax rebate check? Yesterday&apos;s &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://marketplace.publicradio.org/www_publicradio/tools/media_player/popup.php?name=marketplace/pm/2008/04/01/marketplace_cast1_20080401_64&amp;starttime=00:12:28.0&amp;endtime=00:16:42.0&quot;&gt;Marketplace&lt;/a&gt;&apos; says think again. &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/04/01/april_1st/&quot;&gt;(Marketplace transcript)&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70455</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:45:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Marketplace</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>ThisAmericanLife</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>East Manitoba Regional Junior Kabaddi Champion &apos;94</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments On Case Determining Whether American Citizens Have the Right to Carry Hanguns under the Second Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70001/SCOTUS%2DHears%2DOral%2DArguments%2DOn%2DCase%2DDetermining%2DWhether%2DAmerican%2DCitizens%2DHave%2Dthe%2DRight%2Dto%2DCarry%2DHanguns%2Dunder%2Dthe%2DSecond%2DAmendment</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/07-290.pdf&quot;&gt;Oral arguments&lt;/a&gt; were heard today in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-agrees-to-rule-on-gun-case/&quot;&gt;District of Columbia v. Heller&lt;/a&gt;, the first occasion in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290/&quot;&gt;almost 70 years&lt;/a&gt; for the Supreme Court to decide the question, &quot;Just what does the &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment02/&quot;&gt;Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution&lt;/a&gt; mean?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70001</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:26:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Firearms</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Rights</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>Law Talkin&apos; Guy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Tell Your Friends 2 Amend!&quot;  Oh, and &quot;Give 10 to Amend!&quot;  (barf)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44269/Tell%2DYour%2DFriends%2D2%2DAmend%2DOh%2Dand%2DGive%2D10%2Dto%2DAmend%2Dbarf</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.amendforarnold.com/Default.aspx"&gt;Amend for Arnold &amp; Jen&lt;/a&gt; (found on linkfilter) is a site trying to start up one of them &quot;grassroots movements&quot; to amend the Constitution of the United States, in order to allow naturalized citizens, those who were not born in the U.S. but have since become citizens, the possibility of holding the office of President.  But not just out of a sense of social justice; primarily, it&apos;s to clear the way for an Arnold Schwarzenegger presidential campaign.  (Or one for Jennifer Granholm... heh, whoever &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michigan.gov/gov/&quot;&gt;that&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

It should be noted, for whatever it&apos;s worth, that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Granholm&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&apos;s entry for Granholm&lt;/a&gt; states that she cares &quot;not a whit&quot; for running for president.  Of special note are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amendforarnold.com/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;slogans&lt;/a&gt; the AFA (&lt;em&gt;gasp, not AFA&amp;amp;J?!?!&lt;/em&gt;) people cooked up to advance their cause, &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Amend US&lt;/strong&gt;,&quot; &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Give 10 to Amend&lt;/strong&gt;,&quot; and &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Tell Your Friends 2 Amend&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;  Because let&apos;s face it: if you voted for ol&apos; Schwarzy, you&apos;re probably a little more susceptible to catchphrases than the average bear, hm?  &lt;small&gt;Oh I&apos;m know I&apos;m gonna catch it for &lt;strong&gt;that&lt;/strong&gt; one.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44269</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 03:24:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>lame</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>schwarzenegger</category>
		<category>slogan</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>JHarris</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Grin and bear it.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39870/Grin%2Dand%2Dbear%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ij.org/private_property/connecticut/"&gt;Seizure of land for the public good or unconstitutional cash grab?&lt;/a&gt; Originally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment05/14.html&quot;&gt;the power of eminent domain&lt;/a&gt; was used by government to condemn property for the public good, usually to build railroads or highways or bridges. This power has been expanded to &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=348&amp;invol=26&quot;&gt;redevelop dilapidated neighbourhoods&lt;/a&gt;, and ultimately, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.castlecoalition.org/report/&quot;&gt;&quot;economic development&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (public good by way of jobs and&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1028/p08s03-comv.html&quot;&gt; taxes&lt;/a&gt;). What will you do when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=69E929A1-4C2C-42EB-B7DA-433632CF1C62&quot;&gt;Pfizer wants to build a research facility&lt;/a&gt; *on* your backyard and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=bc6157ef-3502-4c26-9b16-005e13dd1d64&quot;&gt;your government helps them do it&lt;/a&gt;?  Hint: it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22eminent+domain%22+%2B%22wal+mart%22&amp;sourceid=mozilla-search&amp;start=0&amp;start=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&quot;&gt;nothing new&lt;/a&gt;, just wait for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/china0304/2.htm&quot;&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nyc2012.com/plan.sec1.html&quot;&gt;2012 (maybe)&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39870</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:47:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>property</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>scotus</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>loquax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Party like it&apos;s 1892</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38391/Party%2Dlike%2Dits%2D1892</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://history.smsu.edu/wrmiller/Populism/texts/farmers_and_third_party_politics.htm"&gt;Party like it&apos;s 1892!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Executive power and patronage have been used to corrupt our legislatures and defeat the will of the people, and plutocracy has thereby been enthroned upon the ruins of democracy.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/29.htm&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;  In the late 1800s, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Populist_Party&quot;&gt;Populist Party&lt;/a&gt;, or People&apos;s Party, formed to merge the Farmers Alliance message of economic empowerment for growers with the Knights of Labor&apos;s movement to check the growing power and corrupt practices of big business &lt;small&gt;(along with the Greenbacks Party critiques of monetary policy)&lt;/small&gt;.  With a strong base in the midwest and south, the party earned 9% of the 1892 popular vote, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ElectoralCollege1892-Large.png&quot;&gt;won the presidential electoral votes of four states&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(not to mention electing 10 congressmen, 5 senators, 3 governors, and 1,500 state legislators)&lt;/small&gt;. However the party&apos;s power quickly faded as the Democratic Party co-opted much of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5361/&quot;&gt;Populist platform&lt;/a&gt; while  &lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.vassar.edu/1896/populists.html&quot;&gt;internal disputes&lt;/a&gt; culminated in the Populists placing the Dems&apos; 1896 nominee at the head of their own ticket.  Nevertheless, the populist movement&apos;s influence continued to be felt through various 20th century reforms including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historicaldocuments.com/17thAmendment.htm&quot;&gt;direct election of senators&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&quot;&gt;presidential term limits&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/ess_nixongold.html&quot;&gt;abandonment of the gold standard&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38391</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:14:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1892</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>DemocraticParty</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>farmers</category>
		<category>GildedAge</category>
		<category>GreenbacksParty</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>KnightsOfLabor</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>Party</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>populism</category>
		<category>Populist</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>nakedcodemonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>foreign-born presidents</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36070/foreignborn%2Dpresidents</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/06/politics/06presidency.html?oref=login"&gt;Foreign-born presidents reviewed again.&lt;/a&gt; NYT link.  Some previous discussion &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/14595&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36070</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>President</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>yoga</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush calls for same-sex marriage-ban amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31387/Bush%2Dcalls%2Dfor%2Dsamesex%2Dmarriageban%2Damendment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/24/elec04.prez.bush.marriage/index.html"&gt;Bush calls for same-sex marriage-ban amendment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Pres. Bush&lt;/strong&gt; called for a constitutional amendment against gay marriage today, blaming &quot;activist judges&quot;, the Massachusettes Supreme Court, and the mayor of San Francisco, among others, for attempting &quot;to change the most fundamental institution of civilization.&quot;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How this call for an amendment plays out &lt;em&gt;remains to be seen&lt;/em&gt;, but Bush is taking a strong stance on this issue, in what some see as another &apos;big headline&apos; proposal during the election season. What will this mean for the civil rights of homosexuals in this country? And how will voters react in November?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31387</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:51:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendments</category>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>constitutional</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>homosexual</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>samesexmarriage</category>
		<category>samesexmarriageban</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>nyukid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A More Perfect Union</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28362/A%2DMore%2DPerfect%2DUnion</link>
		<description> 216 years ago today, the constitution of the United States was signed with &quot;Unanimous Consent&quot;* from the thirteen states. In the years since, many have used the other writings of those governmental framers to interpret the constitution. To make that task easier, the University of Chicago Press offers &lt;a href=&quot;http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/&quot;&gt;The Framer&apos;s Constitution&lt;/a&gt;, an exhaustively annotated document that includes not just references to those other writings, but the complete texts as well. The print version is 3200 pages and costs a pretty penny, but thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertyfund.org/&quot;&gt;the Liberty Fund&lt;/a&gt;, you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/tocs/toc.html&quot;&gt;access it on-line&lt;/a&gt; for free.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28362</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>framers</category>
		<category>libertyfund</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>universityofchicagopress</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>ewagoner</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Circuit Court Refuses to Hear Allegiance Case</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23948/Circuit%2DCourt%2DRefuses%2Dto%2DHear%2DAllegiance%2DCase</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,267702,00.html"&gt;Michael Newdow&lt;/a&gt; is probably smiling today.  The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals  has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/28/pledge.of.allegiance.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;refused to reconsider&lt;/a&gt; last June&apos;s ruling finding the Pledge of Allegiance to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/18074&quot;&gt;unconstitutional&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23948</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:30:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>appeals</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>michaelnewdow</category>
		<category>newdow</category>
		<category>pledgeofallegiance</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>mrbula</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Constitution&apos;s 27 Amendments in our daily lives</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21913/The%2DConstitutions%2D27%2DAmendments%2Din%2Dour%2Ddaily%2Dlives</link>
		<description> &#8220;A nation is little more and nothing less than a conversation.  [T]he conversation that is the United States has continued for more than 200 years as a lover&apos;s quarrel between equality and justice.&#8221;  A gallery of ways this &#8220;conversation&#8221; is still taking place in the ways we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.postgazette.com/nation/20021127constitutionp3.asp&quot;&gt;live the Constitution&#8217;s 27 Amendments &lt;/a&gt;every day.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21913</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:18:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendments</category>
		<category>americanhistory</category>
		<category>billofrights</category>
		<category>civics</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>arco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18208/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_2089000/2089110.stm"&gt;The anomalies of the U.S. Constitution: what next?&lt;/a&gt; Ok, not a serious &apos;polemical&apos; post, more a request for your take on the mysteries which politics brings us...&lt;br&gt;

- how come Wyoming has 3 Senators?&lt;br&gt;

- how come DC has none? &lt;br&gt;

- what other wierd stuff would you fix in the Constitution of your state, given the choice? (for my part, ditching the Windsors and embracing democracy would be a start...)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18208</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2002 06:50:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>dash_slot-</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4228/</link>
		<description> It turns out before the election, representatives introduced a bi-partisan bill in both the House (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:H.J.RES.113:&quot;&gt;H.J. Res. 113&lt;/a&gt;) and the Senate (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:SJ00056:&quot;&gt;S.J. Res. 56&lt;/a&gt;) to amend the Constitution to replace the electoral college with the direct election of the President and Vice President. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shinybluegrasshopper.com/reform.html&quot;&gt;Contact your reps&lt;/a&gt; to ask them to support the bills. If we&apos;re going to get electoral reform, it will be now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4228</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:45:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendment</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>ConstitutionalAmendment</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>ElectoralCollege</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>veruca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


