<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with us and military</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/us+military</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'us' and 'military' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:00:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:00:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>US Military Cuts And A Step Towards Equality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86228/US%2DMilitary%2DCuts%2DAnd%2DA%2DStep%2DTowards%2DEquality</link>
		<description> Yesterday, US President Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/business/29defense.html&quot;&gt;signed a $680bn military policy bill&lt;/a&gt;, which &lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/28/obama_signs_defense_authorizat.html&quot;&gt;cuts military spending&lt;/a&gt;, including $2bn in funding for new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.f22fighter.com/&quot;&gt;F-22&lt;/a&gt; fighter jets.  However, the bill also &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20091028/pl_mcclatchy/3343585&quot;&gt; contained the first major piece of federal gay rights legislation&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/290/push-for-enactment-of-matthew-shepard-act-which-e/&quot;&gt;fulfilled an Obama campaign promise&lt;/a&gt;: acts of violence against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people have now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/28/hate.crimes/index.html&quot;&gt;been added to the list of federal hate crimes&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86228</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:00:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bisexual</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>equality</category>
		<category>federalgovernment</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>hatecrimes</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>protection</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>spending</category>
		<category>transgender</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Don&apos;t Ask, Don&apos;t Tell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82350/Dont%2DAsk%2DDont%2DTell</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/06/09/opinion/1194840804819/op-ed-a-gay-soldier-s-husband.html"&gt;A Gay Soldier&apos;s Husband&lt;/a&gt; &#8212; In the backdrop of the conservative activist Supreme Court&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2009316193_scotus09.html&quot;&gt;recent decision against hearing a challenge&lt;/a&gt; to the US military&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don&apos;t_ask,_don&apos;t_tell&quot;&gt;&quot;Don&apos;t Ask, Don&apos;t Tell&quot;&lt;/a&gt; policy, one gay American relates the difficulties he faces having a partner on active duty in Iraq. In Iraq itself, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&amp;sc=&amp;sc2=news&amp;sc3=&amp;id=91976&quot;&gt;death squads&lt;/a&gt; continue to murder gay and lesbian Iraqis, while American occupying forces look the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&amp;sc=&amp;sc2=&amp;sc3=&amp;id=92274&quot;&gt;other way&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82350</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>equalprotection</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Air Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78037/Air%2DFlow</link>
		<description> How to blog, or counter-blog, for the US Air force,  in &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2009/01/usaf-blog-respo.html&quot;&gt;handy flow chart form&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78037</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:44:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Airforce</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>flowchart</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USAF</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Team Lioness - Female Soldiers in Combat in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76538/Team%2DLioness%2DFemale%2DSoldiers%2Din%2DCombat%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18513&quot;&gt;Team Lioness&lt;/a&gt; is the name given to a group of female soliders, (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/lioness/film.html&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lionessthefilm.com/&quot;&gt;documentary&lt;/a&gt; about them) who were some of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91698225&quot;&gt;first&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/03/2008_12_wed.shtml&quot;&gt;women&lt;/a&gt; in modern American warfare to engage in frontline combat &#8212; something that is officially forbidden by the military. &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=403cb6c1-f8ea-4b99-bc72-2391d1ade68d&quot;&gt;The&lt;/a&gt; female support soliders were assigned to the 1st Engineer Battalion and they were recruited to accompany Marine units during raids. Originally, the female soldiers were there to search and detain any women they came upon and to guard the unit&apos;s Arabic interpreter. Over time, however, as the situation in Ramadi deteriorated, the Marine units transitioned into a more offensive role, baiting insurgents into firefights in order to draw them out. Until officers higher up the chain got spooked over the possibility of a female soldier killed in combat and quietly disbanded the unit, members of Team Lioness were often right in the thick of things, including some of the fiercest urban firefights of the Iraq War.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76538</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:49:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>combat</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>marines</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>nooneyouknow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;[P]ropaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state....&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70548/Propaganda%2Dis%2Dto%2Da%2Ddemocracy%2Dwhat%2Dthe%2Dbludgeon%2Dis%2Dto%2Da%2Dtotalitarian%2Dstate</link>
		<description> Need money? Have a blog? Well, your troubles may be over: &quot;Hiring a block of bloggers to verbally attack a specific person or promote a specific message may be worth considering.&quot; Of course, if you don&apos;t want to play along, there are other ways to make your blog useful:&lt;blockquote&gt;Hacking the site and subtly changing the messages and data&#8212;merely a few words or phrases&#8212;may be sufficient to begin destroying the blogger&#8217;s credibility with the audience....  If the messages are subtly tweaked and the data corrupted in the right way, the enemy may reason that the blogger in question has betrayed them and... take down the site (and the blogger) themselves....&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Who might you be interested in &lt;a href=&apos;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/03/report-recruit.html&apos;&gt;&quot;clandestinely recruiting or hiring prominent bloggers&quot;?&lt;/a&gt; Oh, the US military.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70548</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:19:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>orthogonality</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Of 10 governments worldwide implicated in the recruitment or use of children as soldiers, nine receive US military assistance.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60692/Of%2D10%2Dgovernments%2Dworldwide%2Dimplicated%2Din%2Dthe%2Drecruitment%2Dor%2Duse%2Dof%2Dchildren%2Das%2Dsoldiers%2Dnine%2Dreceive%2DUS%2Dmilitary%2Dassistance</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://hrw.org/campaigns/crp/child_soldiers/index.htm"&gt;&quot;Of 10 governments worldwide implicated in the recruitment or use of children as soldiers, nine receive US military assistance.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60692</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:22:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Child</category>
		<category>Military</category>
		<category>Soldiers</category>
		<category>Spending</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>chunking express</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nothing beats pulling out.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47326/Nothing%2Dbeats%2Dpulling%2Dout</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1902806,00.html"&gt;Britain may pull out of the JSF program.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsf.mil/&quot;&gt;Multinational defense programmes&lt;/a&gt; are becoming more common, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/jsf/&quot;&gt;JSF&lt;/a&gt; is indicative of particularly close ties between the U.K. and the U.S. Representatives &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/12/uk-warns-usa-over-itar-arms-restrictions/index.php&quot;&gt;Hyde&lt;/a&gt; and Hunter have opposed the transfer of technology to Britain. Even with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade2?PUBREF=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A6-2004-0022+0+DOC+PDF+V0//en&amp;L=en&amp;LEVEL=3&amp;NAV=S&amp;LSTDOC=Y&quot;&gt;Rueda Report&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) concluding that the embargo against China not be lifted, eventual third-party sales to China still &lt;a href=&quot;http://htjyang.blog-city.com/uk_and_the_jsf_program.htm&quot;&gt;appear a concern&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47326</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:06:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>eu</category>
		<category>jsf</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>Captaintripps</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>On The New American Militarism - How Americans Are Seduced By War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39801/On%2DThe%2DNew%2DAmerican%2DMilitarism%2DHow%2DAmericans%2DAre%2DSeduced%2DBy%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;The argument I make in my book is that what I describe as the new American militarism arises as an unintended consequence of the reaction to the Vietnam War and more broadly, to the sixties... If some people think that the sixties constituted a revolution, that revolution produced a counterrevolution, launched by a variety of groups that had one thing in common: they saw revival of American military power, institutions, and values as the antidote to everything that in their minds had gone wrong. None of these groups &#8212; the neoconservatives, large numbers of Protestant evangelicals, politicians like Ronald Reagan, the so-called defense intellectuals, and the officer corps &#8212; set out saying, &#8220;Militarism is a good idea.&#8221; But I argue that this is what we&#8217;ve ended up with: a sense of what military power can do, a sort of deference to the military, and an attribution of virtue to the men and women who serve in uniform. Together this constitutes such a pernicious and distorted attitude toward military affairs that it qualifies as militarism. &lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bu.edu/alumni/bostonia/2004/winter/war/&quot; title=&quot;How do you see us getting out of this World War IV mess? &apos;I think the beginning of wisdom is to rethink our attitudes and expectations with regard to military power and to come to something that&#8217;s more realistic and balanced &#8212; and I&#8217;d emphasize, more in harmony with our democracy. This outsourcing to a professional elite of our responsibility as citizens to defend the country, this penchant for interventionism in our world, this expectation that somehow the building up of ever-greater military power offers some sort of antidote to the problems that we face &#8212; these are wrong. We can&#8217;t come to the right answer until we first recognize that the accepted answer is defective &#8212; fundamentally defective.&apos;&quot;&gt;An interview with Andrew Bacevich&lt;/a&gt;, international relations professor and former Army colonel, and author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryOther/MilitaryHistory/~~/cHI9MTAmcGY9MCZzcz1wdWJkYXRlLmFzYyZzZj1jb21pbmdzb29uJnNkPWFzYyZ2aWV3PXVzYSZjaT0wMTk1MTczMzg0&quot; title=&quot;In this provocative new book, Andrew Bacevich warns of a dangerous dual obsession that has taken hold of Americans, conservatives and liberals alike. It is a marriage of militarism and utopian ideology--of unprecedented military might wed to a blind faith in the universality of American values. This perilous union, Bacevich argues, commits Americans to a futile enterprise, turning the US into a crusader state with a self-proclaimed mission of driving history to its final destination: the world-wide embrace of the American way of life. This mindset invites endless war and the ever-deepening militarization of US policy. It promises not to perfect but to pervert American ideals and to accelerate the hollowing out of American democracy. As it alienates others, it will leave the United States increasingly isolated. It will end in bankruptcy, moral as well as economic, and in abject failure.&quot;&gt;The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War&lt;/a&gt;--and here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://antiwar.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=The+New+American+Militarism+-+by+Paul+Craig+Roberts&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=12911826&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fantiwar.com%2Froberts%2F%3Farticleid%3D4445&amp;partnerID=16&quot; title=&quot;The new American militarism has abandoned the Founding Fathers, deserted the Constitution, and unrestrained the executive. War is a first resort. Militarism is inconsistent with globalism and with American ideals. It will end in abject failure. The world is a vast place. The U.S. has demonstrated that it cannot impose its will on a tiny part known as Iraq. American realism may yet reassert itself, dispel the fog of delusion, cleanse the body politic of the Jacobin spirit, and lead the world by good example. But this happy outcome will require regime change in the U.S.&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt;. Recently by Bacevich: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/commentary/la-oe-bacevich20feb20,1,6632062,print.story?coll=la-iraq-commentary&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true&quot; title=&quot;In the early days of the insurgency, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez vowed to use &apos;whatever combat power is necessary to win,&apos; displaying all the pugnacity of a George Patton or Stormin&apos; Norman Schwarzkopf... Senior commanders no longer make such bold promises. Nor do senior civilian officials in Washington. Indeed, today the Bush administration&apos;s aim is not to win but to relieve itself of responsibility for waging a war that it began but cannot finish. Debate in national security circles focuses not on deploying war-winning technologies or fielding innovative tactics that might turn the tide, but on how we can extricate ourselves before our overstretched forces suffer irreparable damage... The decisive victory promised by the war&apos;s advocates back in March 2003 &#8212; remember all the talk of &apos;shock and awe&apos;? &#8212; has now slipped beyond our grasp.&quot;&gt;We Aren&apos;t Fighting to Win Anymore - U.S. troops in Iraq are only trying to buy time&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39801</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>andrewbacevich</category>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>bacevich</category>
		<category>militarism</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>vietnam</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thousandth U.S. soldier dies in War on Terror.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34187/Thousandth%2DUS%2Dsoldier%2Ddies%2Din%2DWar%2Don%2DTerror</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://icasualties.org"&gt;Over a thousand U.S. soldiers have died in the War on Terror.&lt;/a&gt; As of today, 872 soldiers have died in Operation Iraqi Freedom and 129 in &lt;a href=&quot;http://icasualties.org/oef&quot;&gt;Operation Enduring Freedom&lt;/a&gt;. Time for a moment of silence, perhaps, before sharing your reflections on the subject.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34187</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:52:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1000</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>operationenduringfreedom</category>
		<category>operationiraqifreedom</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Malaria vaccine casues permanent brain damage</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33350/Malaria%2Dvaccine%2Dcasues%2Dpermanent%2Dbrain%2Ddamage</link>
		<description> In the &lt;strong&gt;can-anything-else-go-wrong&lt;/strong&gt; file, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040526-105156-8460r&quot;&gt;US Troops suffer from permanent brain damage after being administered malaria treatment&lt;/a&gt;.  For as big a logistical challenge a war might be, and technological advances in mass support systems, you&apos;d think the joint-forces would &lt;em&gt;do a better job&lt;/em&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33350</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 10:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>braindamage</category>
		<category>malaria</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>permanent</category>
		<category>personnel</category>
		<category>sideeffects</category>
		<category>troops</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>vaccine</category>
		<dc:creator>omidius</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>protecting ancient sites in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33297/protecting%2Dancient%2Dsites%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123007778"&gt;Protecting the Cradle&lt;/a&gt; Kirkuk Air Base --  US Army Colonel works with Iraqi archaeological officials to protect nearby ancient sites. &lt;br&gt; &lt;/br&gt;
Meanwhile at more secluded mounds, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/04/international/worldspecial/04ANTI.html?ei=5070&amp;en=bb3bc845d8fc7c4d&amp;ex=1085630400&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt;looters continue to plunder&lt;/a&gt; the sites and to erase the tangible record of the world&apos;s earliest civilizations.  &quot;When you come here at night, it looks like a city, there are so many lights,&quot; [Archaeological official Abdul-Amir] Hamdani  said, looking out over the arid scrubland where thieves swarm after dark.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33297</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 10:41:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ancient</category>
		<category>archaeology</category>
		<category>dig</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>mounds</category>
		<category>sites</category>
		<category>thieves</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>mcgraw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>the wrong morons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33022/the%2Dwrong%2Dmorons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2903288.php"&gt;The Wrong Morons.&lt;/a&gt; (from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armytimes.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Army Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;) &quot;Around the halls of the Pentagon, a term of caustic derision has emerged for the enlisted soldiers at the heart of the furor over the Abu Ghraib prison scandal: the six morons who lost the war...But the folks in the Pentagon are talking about the wrong morons.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33022</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 09:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>ArmyTimes</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21106/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/"&gt;United States Military Operations.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://207.27.3.29/top200/01top/s3chart.htm&quot;&gt;Quite&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/swg/owa/WebGuard.Login?APPL=9004&amp;RULE=01&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/index.html&quot;&gt;few&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21106</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20277/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/africa/09/24/ivory.coast/index.html"&gt;U.S. forces head to Ivory Coast&lt;/a&gt;  - with all the debate for/against military action in the middle-east, I&apos;m pleased to see US forces being deployed to protect innocent people.
&quot;Their first task may be to retrieve about 100 American children who have been trapped at a school in the city of Bouake for five days and to protect Americans in three or four Ivory Coast towns held by rebels. &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20277</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:23:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ivorycoast</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>Stuart_R</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19411/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=326813"&gt;US demands information on long forgotten downed pilot&lt;/a&gt; while insisting they not release the names or allow legal counsel to &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14203-2002Jun19.html&quot;&gt;enemy combatants&lt;/a&gt;&quot; held within the US?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19411</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:55:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>enemycombatants</category>
		<category>genevaconventions</category>
		<category>gulfwar</category>
		<category>mia</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>pilot</category>
		<category>pow</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11080/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/03/alexander.cnna/index.html"&gt;The G-Rated War: Blowing Smoke, Pipe Dream, or The Real Hashish?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I want to spin antiwar arguments a slightly different way. Previous threads have been quite dim. This Cnn chat transcript focuses on the use of non-lethal weapons, the need to separate innocents from terrorists and separate terrorist networks from Islamic states, and the interviewee is as much as suit as they come. You could cut a diamond on that crew cut. I have several questions: 1) Is the US military actually going to use non-lethal weapons, or is this the new &quot;smart bomb?&quot; 2) Do the &apos;pacificists&apos; among us consider this to be pacificist? 3) If you do favor peace over war, do you think this is a good compromise between peace and war, or is the issue by definition binary? More &gt; &gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11080</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>nonlethal</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


