<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with usa and Republicans</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/usa+Republicans</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'usa' and 'Republicans' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:48:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What&apos;s the difference between Democratic and Republican congressmen? $55,000.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71317/Whats%2Dthe%2Ddifference%2Dbetween%2DDemocratic%2Dand%2DRepublican%2Dcongressmen%2D55000</link>
		<description> Want to live it up at the U.S. party conventions and get access to Senators and Congressmen? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-04-30-donors-conventions_N.htm&quot;&gt;USA Today&lt;/a&gt; has posted the campaign committee price lists:&lt;br&gt;
Democratic &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/dems2.pdf&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/dems1.pdf&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Republican &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/gop2.pdf&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/gop1.pdf&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you&apos;ve got the dough, you may conveniently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dscc.org/conventionPAC&quot;&gt;request a convention package&lt;/a&gt; online from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dscc.org/&quot;&gt;Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee&lt;/a&gt;.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrcc.org/&quot;&gt;National Republican Congressional Committee&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrsc.org/&quot;&gt;NRSC&lt;/a&gt; have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrcc.org/about/default.asp?ID=37&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt; price &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrsc.org/membership/&quot;&gt;lists&lt;/a&gt; on their sites, but it seems like the DSCC and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccc.org/&quot;&gt;DCCC&lt;/a&gt; sites keep theirs under wraps.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71317</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>fundraising</category>
		<category>lobbyists</category>
		<category>lobbys</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>PAC</category>
		<category>PACs</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>TheOnlyCoolTim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>And you thought the puppets were a bold move.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35149/And%2Dyou%2Dthought%2Dthe%2Dpuppets%2Dwere%2Da%2Dbold%2Dmove</link>
		<description> &lt;strong&gt;Urban Guerilla Warfare&lt;/strong&gt;.  The upcoming protests outside the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gopconvention.com/&quot;&gt;Republican National Convention&lt;/a&gt; are becoming less notable for the expected numbers and more notable for the extremes each side will go to.  The GOP has decided &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/22/politics/campaign/22repubs.html?hp&quot;&gt;to blame everything happening outside on the Democratic Party&lt;/a&gt;.  Liberal groups are feared to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0428-01.htm&quot;&gt;infiltrating the convention&apos;s own volunteer staff&lt;/a&gt;.  And some right-wingers, feeling &quot;compassionate conservatism&quot; means &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/8/22/181631/279&quot;&gt;abandoning people in the middle of New York&lt;/a&gt;, have taken to pretending to offer housing to out-of-state protestors.  Has anyone else started to dismiss the idea of a terrorist attack simply as &quot;too obvious?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35149</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>convention</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>NewYork</category>
		<category>NYC</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>BOHICA!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35009/BOHICA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html?ex=1093676124&amp;amp;ei=1&amp;amp;en=3317fe536a85ceae"&gt;Is the GOP tampering with Florida elections?&lt;/a&gt; The New York Times reports that State police officers have gone into the homes of elderly black voters in Orlando and interrogated them as part of an odd &quot;investigation&quot; that has frightened many voters, intimidated elderly volunteers and thrown a chill over efforts to get out the black vote in November.
Also, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freep.com/news/statewire/sw101420_20040721.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://edusolution.com/myclassroom/classnotes/reconstruction/jimcrowtoday.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. 
Why do we even put up with this?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35009</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intimidation</category>
		<category>JebBush</category>
		<category>Orlando</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>black8</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush camp solicits race of Star staffer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34688/Bush%2Dcamp%2Dsolicits%2Drace%2Dof%2DStar%2Dstaffer</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/dailystar/32301.php"&gt;Bush camp solicits race of Star staffer.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;President Bush&apos;s re-election campaign insisted on knowing the race of an Arizona Daily Star journalist assigned to photograph Vice President Dick Cheney.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The jounalist&apos;s name was Mamta Popat. She sure &lt;strong&gt;sounds&lt;/strong&gt; like a terrorist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 08:45:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Arizona</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>DailyStar</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>MamtaPopat</category>
		<category>photographer</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racialprofiling</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>JeffK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Decline the Nomination</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32375/Decline%2Dthe%2DNomination</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Declinom/petition.html"&gt;Frustrated Republicans:&lt;/a&gt; President on &lt;a href=&quot;http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040410/D81S6L6G1.html&quot;&gt;vacation &lt;/a&gt;while &lt;a href=&quot;http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAH2HE5WSD.html&quot;&gt;Iraq burns&lt;/a&gt; got you down? Feeling loyal to the party, ideas, or repulsed by the Dems? Agonizing over voting Bush to stay true? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petitiononline.com/Declinom/petition.html&quot;&gt;Sign the petition&lt;/a&gt;, Maybe you won&apos;t have to.  And Dems, if you can promise to be open minded in November you can sign as well. &lt;em&gt;via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bopnews.com/&quot;&gt;Blogging of the President&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32375</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:03:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>nomination</category>
		<category>petition</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>daver</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Getting Evangelicalism All Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32368/Getting%2DEvangelicalism%2DAll%2DWrong</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/bush/articles/2004/04/04/apocalyptic_president/"&gt;How the left&apos;s fear of a right-wing Christian conspiracy gets George W. Bush -- and today&apos;s evangelical Christians -- all wrong.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wheaton.edu/english/faculty/jacobs.htm&quot;&gt;Alan Jacobs&lt;/a&gt; (more from him &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2000/10/wolfe-jacobs.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobdylan.com/etc/ajacobs.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) suggests that the idea that President Bush&apos;s evangelical Christianity has an impact on his politics is really a misunderstanding of Bush, fundamentalists, and evangelicals.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32368</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:48:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlanJacobs</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>Conservatives</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Evangelical</category>
		<category>Fundamentalist</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RightWing</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>marcusb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>They don&apos;t like me, they really don&apos;t like me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32203/They%2Ddont%2Dlike%2Dme%2Dthey%2Dreally%2Ddont%2Dlike%2Dme</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48304-2004Apr3.html"&gt;Its a vast left wing conspiracy!&lt;/a&gt; It seems that the RNC (Republican national committee) is seeing conspiracy everywhere. There are lots of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moveon.org &quot;&gt;stand alone groups&lt;/a&gt; that have been trying to get rid of this administration before Kerry showed up on the scene, and now that there is a target they want to hang everything on him. Its almost like flattery. 

Of course it reminds me of when &lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/22/146205&amp;mode=thread&amp;tid=117&amp;tid=136&amp;tid=187&amp;tid=88&amp;tid=99&quot;&gt; SCO claimed IBM was orchestrating all the bad press about them.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32203</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:16:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>MrLint</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tricky Dix</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30882/Tricky%2DDix</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/01/22/infiltration_of_files_seen_as_extensive/"&gt;Republican Dirty Tricks&lt;/a&gt; &quot;From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic communications without a password. Trolling through hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points and accounts of private meetings discussing which judicial nominees Democrats would fight -- and with what tactics.

The office of Senate Sergeant-at-Arms William Pickle has already launched an investigation into how excerpts from 15 Democratic memos showed up in the pages of the conservative-leaning newspapers and were posted to a website last November.&quot; They just can&apos;t get Nixon out of their system, huh?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30882</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:39:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A challenger to Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30517/A%2Dchallenger%2Dto%2DBush</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://johnbuchanan.org/"&gt;A challenger to Bush&lt;/a&gt; for the Republican nomination?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30517</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 21:51:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Buchanan</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>JohnBuchanan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>gregb1007</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The sun never sets on the Republican empire</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25000/The%2Dsun%2Dnever%2Dsets%2Don%2Dthe%2DRepublican%2Dempire</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://archive.nytimes.com/2003/04/09/international/worldspecial/09TERR.html"&gt;PATRIOT forever.&lt;/a&gt; Toppling one regime to build another, U.S. Senator &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/~hatch/&quot;&gt;Orrin Hatch (R-UT)&lt;/a&gt; and a Republican coalition are pushing legislation to make the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:h.r.03162:&quot;&gt;PAT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias/hr3162.php&quot;&gt;RIOT&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias/20011031_eff_usa_patriot_analysis.html&quot;&gt;Act&lt;/a&gt; permanent.  It&apos;s daylight forever.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25000</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2003 19:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>gop</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>hatch</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>patriot</category>
		<category>patriotact</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>washington</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24925/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2003/04/05/kerry_speech/index_np.html"&gt;Democrats finally speaking out?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Today the Republican majority leader in the House of Representatives announced that -- and I quote -- &apos;Nothing is more important in the face of war than cutting taxes.&apos; Let me make this clear: Never in its history has the United States passed a big tax cut in a time of war. We have always believed in shared sacrifice. &quot;&lt;/i&gt; Sen. John Kerry&apos;s speech at the Jefferson Jackson Dinner April 3 in Georgia.
(Salon article, click the free day pass to view)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24925</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2003 13:26:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>delay</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>johnkerry</category>
		<category>kerry</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>tomdelay</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>Espoo2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Political Fratricide</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24794/Political%2DFratricide</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vaiw.org/vet/modules.php?op=modload&amp;amp;name=News&amp;amp;file=article&amp;amp;sid=59&amp;amp;mode=thread&amp;amp;order=0&amp;amp;thold=0"&gt;Political Fratricide:&lt;/a&gt; The GOP is reportedly [&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.morons.org/article.jsp?sectionid=8&amp;id=2987&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;] proposing $15 billion of cuts &#8212; or is it $25? &#8212; in veterans&apos; benefits between now and 2007, and groups like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php&quot;&gt;Veterans Against the Iraq War&lt;/a&gt; are hopping mad.  Hell, I imagine the pro-war wing is pretty peeved, too. It&apos;s part of a plan &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/print-friendly/webfeatures/2003/03/kuttner-r-03-27.html&quot;&gt;with delusions of grandeur&lt;/a&gt; to deliver massive tax cuts AND kill the deficit ... you know, the one that did not exist before W was elected, as I understand it ... in six years.  The original tip is from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nowarblog.org/archives/001245.html&quot;&gt;Stand Down&lt;/a&gt;. The actual status of the cuts is nebulous at this point, however, with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/03/25/national0150EST0447.DTL&quot;&gt;SF Chron&lt;/a&gt; reporting that they will likely fail in the Senate as the tax cut is halved and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E64%257E1284042%257E,00.html&quot;&gt;others&lt;/a&gt; reporting that the die is not yet cast. The House budget resolution, for metafilter accountants who like these things, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_reports&amp;docid=f:hr037.108&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24794</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:38:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>deficit</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>spending</category>
		<category>taxcuts</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VA</category>
		<category>veterans</category>
		<dc:creator>hairyeyeball</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>environmental spin memo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24039/environmental%2Dspin%2Dmemo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/politics/02ENVI.html"&gt;Spinning the Environment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt; One section of the memorandum, &quot;Winning the Global Warming Debate,&quot; asserts that many voters believe there is a lack of consensus about global warming among scientists. &quot;Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly,&quot; it says. &quot;Therefore you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue.&quot;

Among the ways to &quot;challenge the science,&quot; the memorandum says, is to &quot;be even more active in recruiting experts who are sympathetic to your view and much more active in making them part of your message&quot; because &quot;people are more willing to trust scientists than politicians.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So much for science based decisions regarding the fouling of our nest.  Sounds Green = Is Green in the bizarro world of spin.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24039</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:06:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ClimateChange</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>GlobalWarming</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20423/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22574-2002Sep30.html"&gt;Torricelli Considers Dropping Out Of His Re-Election Bid &lt;/a&gt; ...and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20527-2002Sep29.html&quot;&gt;Republicans&apos; hopes to reclaim the Senate brighten&lt;/a&gt;.  Why drop out now, with only 5 weeks left?  Is Torricelli guilty of even more ethics violations than previously thought?  (more inside...)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20423</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:18:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>jennak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18721/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4054-2002Jul26.html"&gt;Gore questions timing of Iraq concern&lt;/a&gt; Is it proper to invade Iraq?  This would be an unprecedented move for the US military as Iraq has not attacked the US anyone the US has defense treaties with. 
&quot;Republican National Committee spokesman Jim Dyke called Gore&apos;s comments &quot;irresponsible.&quot;
&quot;This is no time to attack the president or Republicans for their handling of the war for political gain,&quot; he said.&quot;

Hmmm..so he admits the Iraqi attack IS for partisan political gain, eh?  I would have never suspected it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18721</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>invasion</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>occupation</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14301/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020130/ap_on_go_co/enron_congress_14"&gt;GOP Will Fight GAO Lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt; Says Orrin Hatch, &quot;the General Accounting Office, shouldn&apos;t be &apos;trying to impose disclosure on internal White House meetings to determine policy. ... If you have to do that, pretty soon there wouldn&apos;t be any meetings.&apos;&quot;

This is going to be a tough move to defend come election time.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14301</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:47:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accountability</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>disclosure</category>
		<category>GAO</category>
		<category>GeneralAccountingOffice</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14190/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/27/business/27POLL.html"&gt;Link from NYTimes front page: as though any party or politician is &quot;Taint&quot; free.&lt;/a&gt; Sort of like saying every MF post is thotful, entelligent, and well spelt. [this post notwithstanding]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14190</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2002 11:53:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>scandal</category>
		<category>taint</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>greyscale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11904/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/00000502.shtml#comments"&gt;Are We Witnessing A Republican Implosion?&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-000085768oct28.story?coll=la%2Dnews%2Dpolitics%2Dnational&quot;&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/a&gt; has three GOP contenders for governor violating Ronald Reagan&apos;s 11th commandment by attacking fellow Republicans. In traditionally Republican Virginia, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63196-2001Oct27.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; says a Democrat is well on his way to becoming governor next week. In New Hampshire, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollcall.com/pages/news/00/2001/10/news1029c.html&quot;&gt;Roll Call&lt;/a&gt; describes what is to be a very bitter primary against an incumbent GOP senator. And finally, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak29.html&quot;&gt;Robert Novak&lt;/a&gt; says the GOP is abandoning its candidate for governor in New Jersey. (More &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalwire.com/cgi-bin/apexec.pl?template=pwt-rssmoreover.html&amp;f1=457&amp;f2=Republican%20News&amp;f8=/Regional/North_America/United_States/Society_and_Culture/Politics/Parties/Republican/&amp;f7=Republicans&amp;f6=92&amp;f9=1&amp;f5=Republicans&quot;&gt;Republican News&lt;/a&gt; via &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalwire.com&quot;&gt;Political Wire&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11904</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2001 08:32:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>governor</category>
		<category>governors</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>flip</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9512/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rollcall.com/pages/news/00/2001/08/news0806b.html"&gt;CNN &amp; FOX: Birds of a feather?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;In an effort to improve his network&apos;s image with conservative leaders, new CNN chief Walter Isaacson huddled with House and Senate GOP leaders last week to seek advice on how to attract more right-leaning viewers to the sagging network.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9512</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2001 08:57:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WalterIsaacson</category>
		<dc:creator>Rastafari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9019/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bsnn.net/Headline%20News/singing%20senators.htm"&gt;But What Will Come of the Singing Senators?&lt;/a&gt; The most shocking part of Senator Jefford&apos;s switch is not that the senate turned Democrat, but that there will be no deep-thoated Repblican heavyweights to raise gobs of money singing &apos;Gonna Take a Lot River&apos; to adoring Republican donors  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bsnn.net/Headline%20News/singing%20senators.htm&quot;&gt;  BSSN speculates that Bono may have had a role &lt;/a&gt; in the Singing Senator&apos;s demise.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9019</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2001 12:25:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaigndonors</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>donors</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>senators</category>
		<category>singingsenators</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>brucec</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8912/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=201006"&gt;Do Republicans dream of electric sheep?&lt;/a&gt; A new study concludes that Republicans have scarier and more frequent nightmares than Democrats. As usual, the explanation for this is split among party lines:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;What do you expect after eight years of William Jefferson Clinton?&quot; -- &lt;/i&gt;Kevin Sheridan, Republican National Committee deputy press secretary.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;If George W. Bush were the leader of my party, I&apos;d have trouble sleeping at night, too,&quot; -- &lt;/i&gt;Terry McAuliffe, Democratic National Committee chairman.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
Wow... deja vu &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/7924&quot;&gt;all&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/8023&quot;&gt;over&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/8234&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8912</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 06:03:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>dreams</category>
		<category>nightmares</category>
		<category>partisan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>sleep</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Dirjy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7772/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.grandoldpetroleum.com/"&gt;Grand Old Petroleum.&lt;/a&gt; GOP.  Get it?  The DNC really cracks me up sometimes.  This is, however, an interesting development in politics.  Is every issue going to have its own clever webpage in the future?  The mind boggles.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7772</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2001 14:28:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>DNC</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>petroleum</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>CRS</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6715/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.startribune.com/stOnLine/cgi-bin/article?thisStory=83889912"&gt;The link between Reagan&apos;s party and Clinton&apos;s persecution&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;After power itself, conservative Republicans have wanted nothing more than to round out the 20th century with the ledgers balanced. They needed a Democratic Richard Nixon and a Republican Franklin D. Roosevelt.&lt;/i&gt;
Tom Teepen makes a pretty good case here.  Clinton wasn&apos;t Nixon, and Reagan sure as hell wasn&apos;t FDR.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6715</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2001 08:23:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>TomTeepen</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5829/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=FT3SJRUJ4JC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;tagid=IXLC078IH7C&amp;amp;Collid=Any"&gt;Republicans plan energy bill&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Legislation to be introduced next week by the Senate energy committee chairman would pay billions of dollars in subsidies to the energy companies, which gave generously in last year&apos;s campaign.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxpayer.net/TCS/Press%20Releases/2-9-01ENERGY.htm&quot;&gt;More here.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5829</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:06:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>companies</category>
		<category>corporate</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5050/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/highlights/essay_lind_tribes/index.html"&gt;Why HAVE the Republican and Democratic parties shifted about so dramatically?&lt;/a&gt; In most periods from 1789 to the present, the US has had two dominant national parties competing to control government: Federalists vs Republicans (1790s-1810s), National Republicans vs Democratic Republicans (1810s-1830s), Whigs vs Democrats (1830s-1850s), Republicans vs Democrats (1850s-present). Despite the changing names, the underlying coalitions have been remarkably stable. In effect, there have been only two main parties in American history: the northern party and the southern party. [via A&amp;LD]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5050</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2001 21:08:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


