<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with verizon</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/verizon</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'verizon' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:24:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:24:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>iDon&apos;t</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85987/iDont</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/17/verizon-launches-direct-attack-against-the-iphone-with-ads-for-the-motorola-droid/"&gt;Verizon takes iPhone head-on.&lt;/a&gt; Will Android finally become something to people outside the nerd set? Will all those people still waiting for the iPhone to come to Verizon actually buy in? Personally, I&apos;m not giving up my iPhone, but I was amused by the commercial.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85987</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:24:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>android</category>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>iphone</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>dame</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Year of Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68242/The%2DYear%2Dof%2DNet%2DNeutrality</link>
		<description> We&apos;re only two weeks into the year, but net neutrality issues  hit the ground running. The FCC already has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,141404-c,internetlegalissues/article.html&quot;&gt;three different inquiries open&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080114-fcc-officially-opens-proceeding-on-comcasts-p2p-throttling.html&quot;&gt;(also)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/68025/The-end-of-net-nuetrality&quot;&gt;(previously)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; The 700 Mhz auction &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/01/11/roadblocks-to-the-mobile-web/&quot;&gt;threatens to disrupt&lt;/a&gt; an &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2008/01/16/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-future-of-broadband/&quot;&gt;already converging&lt;/a&gt; telecom industry. AT&amp;amp;T&apos;s post-merger commitment to net neutrality &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/12/29/att-yields-to-neutrality-paves-path-to-congress/&quot;&gt;ends this year&lt;/a&gt;, and they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/01/09/att-ready-to-filter-the-web/&quot;&gt;plan to test the filtering waters&lt;/a&gt;, despite &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071112-net-neutrality-foes-back-fcc-investigation-into-comcast-traffic-blocking.html?rel&quot;&gt;recently opposing&lt;/a&gt; the practice. And today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080116-leaked-memo-time-warner-cable-to-trial-hard-bandwidth-caps.html&quot;&gt;a leaked memo revealed&lt;/a&gt; that Time Warner will test tiered internet services soon. The Internet as we know it, and communications in general, might be headed for some major changes in 2008.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68242</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:29:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>700mhzauction</category>
		<category>att</category>
		<category>bittorrent</category>
		<category>comcast</category>
		<category>filtering</category>
		<category>netneutrality</category>
		<category>telecom</category>
		<category>timewarner</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<category>voip</category>
		<dc:creator>spiderwire</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>$0.002 != $0.00002</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56857/0002%2D000002</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0HyxQv97Q&amp;amp;eurl="&gt;Math skills are not Verizon&apos;s strong point.&lt;/a&gt; A man tries to resolve a simple problem with Verizon for 22 minutes. Listen, and despair.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56857</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:44:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abuse</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>of</category>
		<category>theeternalstruggle</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>Drunken_munky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Internet Freedom Under Fire - Act Now</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48538/Internet%2DFreedom%2DUnder%2DFire%2DAct%2DNow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://isen.com/blog/2006/01/internet-freedom-or-privilege.html"&gt;Internet: Freedom or Privilege?&lt;/a&gt; David Isenberg:   &quot;Just as Freedom of Speech means that, with very few limitations, nobody has the right to tell somebody else what to say, so should Internet freedom mean that gatekeepers should not control Internet applications or content. This is essential not just as a matter of freedom, but also as a matter of commerce, because the Internet&#8217;s success is directly due to its content-blindness. If the United States fails to understand this, U.S. Internet leadership will follow U.S. leadership in agriculture, in steel, in autos, and in consumer electronics to other countries that do.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48538</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:36:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>sbc</category>
		<category>telecommunications</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>sswiller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Paternalism gone mad?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38988/Paternalism%2Dgone%2Dmad</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/ebiz/0,1272,66226,00.html"&gt;US ISP Verizon&lt;/a&gt; decided late last year to block any email sent from outside the US.  I thought the bounces I was getting from my Verizon contacts were glitches until I &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/4kpz2&quot;&gt;googled&lt;/a&gt;  and found&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.com/2005/01/21/verizon_class_action/&quot;&gt; this&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The arrogance of Verizon is astonishing: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/14/verizon_email_block/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; &quot;If it&apos;s really important you might want to make a phone call&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38988</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:35:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blocking</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>england</category>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>isp</category>
		<category>overseas</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>essexjan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is Traditional Phone Service Doomed?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34548/Is%2DTraditional%2DPhone%2DService%2DDoomed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www22.verizon.com/ForYourHome/voip/voiphome.aspx?LOBCode=C&amp;amp;PromoTCode=VWfh1&amp;amp;PromoSrcCode=B&amp;amp;POEId=BN1FH"&gt;Verizon goes Vonage?&lt;/a&gt; ATT, announced this week that it&apos;s giving up on residential phone service.  And here, from the look of it, Verizon is starting to offer what I believe is Internet-based phone service.  Is the Internet the future of phone?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34548</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:53:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>att</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>phone</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<category>vonage</category>
		<dc:creator>ParisParamus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Not your fathers POTS phone system goes Voip</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30177/Not%2Dyour%2Dfathers%2DPOTS%2Dphone%2Dsystem%2Dgoes%2DVoip</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/yu0n"&gt;Its not your fathers P.O.T.S.&lt;/a&gt; Plain Old Telephone Service is undergoing a fundamental shift as companies such as Verizon, AT&amp;amp;T and British Telecom embrace Internet technology to route long-distance and local phone calls to compete with services from  the likes of upstarts Vonage and Packet8 and Skype etc. Is this the beginning of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yne4&quot;&gt;Telepocalypse 
&lt;/a&gt; a race to the bottom of less and less profit and more and more layoffs? Follow the history and future of the woeful crumbling of the hiearchical phone phone company at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isen.com/NEW.html&quot;&gt;David Isen&apos;s web page &lt;/a&gt; Are the guts of the phone companies the class 5 switch  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.montagar.com/~patj/att-5ess-3.jpg&quot;&gt;go the way of mainframe computer&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30177</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>phones</category>
		<category>telecoms</category>
		<category>telephone</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>RIAA: Stop, or we will sue</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26629/RIAA%2DStop%2Dor%2Dwe%2Dwill%2Dsue</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.techtv.com/news/news/story/0,24195,3463091,00.html"&gt;RIAA: Stop, or we will sue&lt;/a&gt; fresh from its victory against Verizon, the RIAA gears up to go head to head with individual users of P2P. &lt;i&gt;Run and hide!&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26629</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:51:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Lawsuit</category>
		<category>Legal</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>FearTormento</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Told Ya!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22964/Told%2DYa</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;cid=575&amp;amp;u=/nm/20030121/wr_nm/tech_music_dc_3&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;Verizon Must Reveal Internet Song Swapper&lt;/a&gt; In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/22838&quot;&gt;recent discussion&lt;/a&gt; of the Supreme Court&apos;s decision to protect the rights of the individual from the greed and sloth of the  many I warned that the RIAA and MPAA, comically inept though the media paints them, would soon have things their way. This link is to a news report about an important step in their fight for individual rights.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22964</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:18:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>MPAA</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>BGM</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19944/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2002/tc20020912_9326.htm"&gt;Finally, a Fair Fight with Big Music&lt;/a&gt; From a Business Week Online column...&lt;i&gt;&quot;Telecom giant Verizon is battling the industry&apos;s bid to make it name a file-sharing subscriber. It&apos;s also defending your right to privacy. On July 24, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) made an unprecedented request of Verizon Communications (VZ). The music industry&apos;s trade association served the telecom with a subpoena, seeking the identity of a Verizon subscriber who had allegedly illegally traded digital songs by artists including Britney Spears, Jennifer Lopez, and &quot;boy band&quot; N&apos;Sync. The RIAA didn&apos;t specify why it wanted to know who the user was or what it would do with the information.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19944</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:17:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BusinessWeek</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>fpatrick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17264/</link>
		<description> Imagine you are moving between apartments. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www6.verizon.com/cgi-bin/webcgi.exe?new,kb=foryourhome,dtree=6015,varset_statename=NY&quot;&gt;this Verizon &quot;How do I...&quot;&lt;/a&gt; page. Over 40 questions are answered, but the 2nd most obvious question one might have is strangely absent. Then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www3.twcnyc.com/NASApp/CS/ContentServer?pagename=twcnyc/myhome&quot;&gt;try to order a basic cable service&lt;/a&gt; from Time Warner Cable. Do you have other examples of corporate sites that are less than helpful when what you want is less than what they would like to sell - or when you want to cancel?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17264</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2002 21:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cable</category>
		<category>moving</category>
		<category>telephone</category>
		<category>TimeWarner</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>edlundart</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14317/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/wireless/article/0,,10692_962511,00.html"&gt;Nice&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnl.net/newsletter/2002/numbergame.asp&quot;&gt;not&lt;/a&gt;. It looks like Verizon manages to get kudos on their service while getting relatively little exposure while they are trying to lock-in their customers. What do you think? Does it make sense to go to 3G with Verizon or should one go with competitive content providers who are willing to let you keep your phone numbers when we leave them? Which is more important?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14317</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:32:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>customerservice</category>
		<category>phones</category>
		<category>shopping</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>Adman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8273/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newscenter.verizon.com/proactive/newsroom/release.vtml?id=56108"&gt;Verizon sues Covad&lt;/a&gt; for creating thousands of false trouble tickets. So &lt;i&gt;that&apos;s&lt;/i&gt; why my DSL took so long!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8273</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:45:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Covad</category>
		<category>DSL</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>installation</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>litigation</category>
		<category>phoneline</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1669/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://verizonshouldspendmoretimefixingitsnetworkandlessmoneyonlawyers.com/news/2000/0508.html"&gt;verizonREALLYsucks&lt;/a&gt;   Be good, or I&apos;ll sic the AntiCyberSquat on you!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1669</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2000 15:05:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cybersquatting</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>doublepost</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<category>VerizonReallySucks</category>
		<dc:creator>PaperCut</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1607/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wired.com/news/business/0,1367,36210,00.html"&gt;Verizon Wireless &lt;/a&gt;  is jumping on the copyright lawsuit bandwagon. This time they&apos;re picking on 2600. Me thinks they&apos;re playing with fire.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1607</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 06:57:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2600</category>
		<category>cybersquatting</category>
		<category>EmmanuelGoldstein</category>
		<category>Verizon</category>
		<category>VerizonSucks</category>
		<category>verizonsucks.com</category>
		<category>VerizonWireless</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1209/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com"&gt;Verizon&lt;/a&gt; , a true example that there are no good dot com&apos;s left no matter how big you are. They had to put a lot of thought into this one to make it make sense.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1209</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 09:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>bvanveen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


