<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with virus and antivirus</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/virus+antivirus</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'virus' and 'antivirus' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:50:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:50:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Maybe We Love Spam and Viruses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91080/Maybe%2DWe%2DLove%2DSpam%2Dand%2DViruses</link>
		<description> Why aren&apos;t we furious about email&apos;s dysfunction? &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/04/editors-note-spam-data-cited-in-this.html&quot;&gt;Spam just keeps getting worse&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/34180/X-of-email-is-Spam&quot;&gt;And it&apos;s been bad for a long time&lt;/a&gt;. The spam/virus anti-spam/anti-virus arms-race continues to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=59300834&quot;&gt;generate profits for spammers and anti-spammers&lt;/a&gt; at everyone else&apos;s expense. Attachments maybe weren&apos;t a good idea. And neither was the reply-all button. &lt;a href=&quot;http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1319049&amp;cid=28869137&quot;&gt;Attempts at &quot;fixing&quot; email are the subject of ridicule&lt;/a&gt;, and perhaps deservedly so. Google Wave was released as an alternative to email; few seem to care. What gives? Are we really stuck with this crap?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91080</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:50:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antispam</category>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>broken</category>
		<category>dysfunctional</category>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>googlewave</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>fartknocker</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s all Greek to Me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84321/Its%2Dall%2DGreek%2Dto%2DMe</link>
		<description> In 1984 computer pioneer Ken Thompson wrote one of the seminal works of computer security, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf&quot;&gt;Reflections on Trusting Trust&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[PDF]&lt;/small&gt;.  In it he postulated putting a trojan horse inside a compiler as a means of infecting software compiled by it.  25 years later somebody has finally done just that.  Researchers at anti-virus house Sophos have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/08/19/w32induca-spread-delphi-software-houses/&quot;&gt;discovered a virus&lt;/a&gt; that places a backdoor into applications compiled with the Delphi language.  They&apos;ve identified at least 3000 separate Delphi applications that have had this backdoor compiled into them so far, including banking programs and programs used for cellphone programming.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84321</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>compiler</category>
		<category>delphi</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>trojanhorse</category>
		<category>trust</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>scalefree</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Happy 20th birthday, PC virus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48393/Happy%2D20th%2Dbirthday%2DPC%2Dvirus</link>
		<description> On January 19, 1986, the first PC virus &#8212; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/brain.shtml&quot;&gt;Brain&lt;/a&gt; &#8212; was detected.  It was virtually harmless, and the Pakistani creators &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brain.net.pk/aboutus.htm&quot;&gt;claim that&lt;/a&gt; it was only intended to protect their copyrights.  (They did, after all, include their own address and phone number in the machine code.)  In the past 20 years, though, both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madchat.org/vxdevl/vdat/misc0033.htm&quot;&gt;creating viruses&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://software.silicon.com/security/0,39024655,39117842,00.htm&quot;&gt;destroying them&lt;/a&gt; have become billion-dollar industries.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48393</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:03:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>computer</category>
		<category>pc</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>Plutor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>teh uesful</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45612/teh%2Duesful</link>
		<description> for the bookmarks - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/virusinfo/scan.aspx&quot;&gt;free browser-embedded antivirus&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[IE only, I assume Windows only]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 09:57:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>computing</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Microsoft considering anti-virus support</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13048/Microsoft%2Dconsidering%2Dantivirus%2Dsupport</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2830607,00.html"&gt;Microsoft considering anti-virus support&lt;/a&gt;  and why we should care.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13048</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:27:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>GriffX</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12186/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/showtell/story/0,24330,3359131,00.html&quot;&gt;Rob Rosenberger&lt;/a&gt;, editor of &lt;a href=&quot;http://vmyths.com/&quot;&gt;Vmyths.com&lt;/a&gt;, writes that &lt;a href=&quot;http://vmyths.com/rant.cfm?id=409&amp;page=4&quot;&gt;three uniformed federal police visited him in the middle of the night&lt;/a&gt; and asked that he not to publish an upcoming column that would embarrass anti-virus vendor for &quot;national security reasons.&quot; From late-October, but intriguing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12186</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 14:00:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>anti-virus</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>robrosenberger</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Those British boys at it again.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7222/Those%2DBritish%2Dboys%2Dat%2Dit%2Dagain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1294000/1294473.stm"&gt;Those British boys at it again.&lt;/a&gt;   It was like this during the war, y&apos;know.  I remember my old mate Alan Turing beating the system in much the same way.  Saved the world he did.  Tally-ho.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7222</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The bastards at Symantec</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2829/The%2Dbastards%2Dat%2DSymantec</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/download.html"&gt;The bastards at Symantec&lt;/a&gt; are now &lt;a href=&quot;https://rigel.symantec.com/cgi-bin/esd1.pl?sku=07-12-00014&amp;segment=electronic&amp;subsite=us&amp;promocode=ECSALES&amp;VENICE=x&quot;&gt;charging for virus updates.&lt;/a&gt;  They&apos;ve just lost a customer, a hopefully many more.   The feedback form is &lt;a href=&quot;http://service1.symantec.com/DISCUSS/SUPPORT/feedback2.nsf/internet+services+feedback&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; if you feel the need to bitch at them.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2829</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2000 16:19:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>internetsecurity</category>
		<category>norton</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>symantec</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<category>virusdefinitions</category>
		<category>virusupdates</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


