<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with voting and design</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/voting+design</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'voting' and 'design' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:51:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:51:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;Something &#8212; something &#8212; happens every election.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67941/Something%2Dsomething%2Dhappens%2Devery%2Delection%3F</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?ex=1357275600&amp;amp;en=7"&gt;&#8220;I&#8217;m an old computer nerd,&#8221; Diener said. &#8220;I can do anything with computers. Nothing&#8217;s wrong with computers. But this is the worst way to run an election.&#8221;&lt;/a&gt; NYTMag piece on electronic voting, voter confidence, and the impact of old-fashioned problems like printer jams, befuddled voters and volunteers, and interface design flaws. By &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.collisiondetection.net/&quot;&gt;Clive Thompson&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.67941</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:51:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<category>votingmachines</category>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Best-Designed Sites on the Web by Popular Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67351/BestDesigned%2DSites%2Don%2Dthe%2DWeb%2Dby%2DPopular%2DVote</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://commandshift3.com/"&gt;CommandShift3 is like Hot or Not.&lt;/a&gt; Except, instead of clicking on hot babes, you click on hot websites.  It&apos;s actually a pretty nice way to check out good design on the web. It&apos;s also the key combo to do a screenshot on a mac. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67351</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:14:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<dc:creator>MattS</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>opposition through inaction?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23698/opposition%2Dthrough%2Dinaction</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/metro/politics/0203/18bizflag.html"&gt;talking loud, voting on nothing.&lt;/a&gt; georgia&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gov.state.ga.us/&quot;&gt;new governor&lt;/a&gt; is following through on his campaign promise to &quot;let the people speak&quot; regarding the design of our state flag.  the flag was last &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sos.state.ga.us/museum/html/georgia_state_flag_current.htm&quot;&gt;redesigned in 2001&lt;/a&gt; to put to rest a substantial amount of controversy revolving around the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cviog.uga.edu/Projects/gainfo/gaflag.htm&quot;&gt;inclusion of a confederate battle flag&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this opportunity to voice an opinion will be offered to the populace next spring in the form of a non-binding referendum.  and while the results will not result in an official decision either way, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shirleyfranklin.com/&quot;&gt;mayor of atlanta&lt;/a&gt; has said she will take a strong stance in the matter by &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/metro/politics/0203/18bizflag.html&quot;&gt;purposely not [voting] either way on the ballot questions&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;is doing nothing an effective means of protest?  sounds more like a kid on a playground declaring themselves &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.switzerland.taskforce.ch/W/W2/W2a/a1_ei.htm&quot;&gt;switzerland&lt;/a&gt;&quot; in the middle of a fight.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23698</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>flag</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>georgia</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>states</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>grabbingsand</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4594/</link>
		<description> When you&apos;re an aiga member they send you e-mail, I usualy don&apos;t read them, because they&apos;re accouncements of conferences and such, but this one was about Chicago enlisting the help of AIGA to design new election ballots. &apos;Some possibilities for making Chicago ballots more user-friendly include enlarging candidates&apos; names, changing the font size, altering the color of pages, making wider ballot booklets.&apos; Since I couldn&apos;t find the article on-line, I&apos;ll just cut-n-paste the e-mail inside. :)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4594</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2000 12:50:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AIGA</category>
		<category>ballots</category>
		<category>Chicago</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4543/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/article/0,1051,SAV-0011290410,00.html"&gt;Chicago to enlist graphic designers for friendlier ballots.&lt;/a&gt; [free reg may be req&apos;d] There&apos;s been a bunch of discussion about the usability problems with various voting systems, notably punch-card ballots. Chicago didn&apos;t have anything as dramatic as a &quot;butterfly&quot; prexy ballot or two pages&apos; worth of candidates, but we still had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/zorn/0,1122,SAV-0011210368,00.html&quot;&gt;close to 120,000 discards from 2.1 million votes&lt;/a&gt; -- and when compared with jurisdictions using other systems, there&apos;s little evidence to suggest that voters are skipping the presidential ballot. That&apos;s just how bad manual punch card technology is. Even if we can&apos;t get rid of them just yet, at least we can make sure they aren&apos;t confusing.

Did I just post the &lt;i&gt;twenty-sixth&lt;/i&gt; link on Metafilter today? GO AWAY. METAFILTER IS FULL. :)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4543</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 19:27:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>ballots</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Chicago</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


