<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with voting and voters</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/voting+voters</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'voting' and 'voters' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:12:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:12:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Rock the draft</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36506/Rock%2Dthe%2Ddraft</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rockthevote.com/"&gt;Rock the Vote&lt;/a&gt; last month sent out about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockthevote.com/draft/&quot;&gt;600,000 emails&lt;/a&gt; to prospective voters regarding the possilbility of a draft.  Now GOP Chairman Ed Gillespie has sent a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/19/1437244&quot;&gt;cease and desist letter&lt;/a&gt; to try to get RTV to stop.  You can read Gillespie&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.rockthevote.com/multimedia/RNC%20attacks%20RTV.pdf&quot;&gt;letter&lt;/a&gt;(pdf) as well as Rock the Vote&apos;s head Jehmu Greene&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.rockthevote.com/multimedia/RTV%20responds%20to%20RNC.pdf&quot;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt;(pdf).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36506</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:12:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drafts</category>
		<category>edgillespie</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>gillespie</category>
		<category>jehmugreene</category>
		<category>rockthevote</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>bitdamaged</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What if we voted on issues? - The Next Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35930/What%2Dif%2Dwe%2Dvoted%2Don%2Dissues%2DThe%2DNext%2DGeneration</link>
		<description> Remember &quot;They booed the results of their vote. They were upset that they had voted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/35781&quot;&gt;for the &apos;wrong guy&apos;&quot;&lt;/a&gt;? Well, now our so-called third graders are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/html/new_9_29_04.html&quot;&gt;all grown up.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(via  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com&quot;&gt;Kos&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35930</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:21:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>informed</category>
		<category>Kerry</category>
		<category>uninformed</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>soyjoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Morons for Bush?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32942/Morons%2Dfor%2DBush</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://americanassembler.com/features/iq_state_averages.htm"&gt;2000 Election results ranked by avg statewide IQ.&lt;/a&gt; Shame on me for even posting this here in this slavering den of liberal fervor, but if it&apos;s true, it certainly is kinda fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32942</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 09:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>just the facts, ma&apos;am.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32065/just%2Dthe%2Dfacts%2Dmaam</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.factcheck.org/default.aspx"&gt;factcheck.org&lt;/a&gt; -- a nonpartisan, nonprofit, &quot;consumer advocate&quot; for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32065</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:07:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consumeradvocacy</category>
		<category>factcheck</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>voteradvocacy</category>
		<category>votereducation</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21390/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/20021102/bob8.asp"&gt;Are we using the worst voting procedure?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Voting theorists argue that plurality voting is one of the worst of all possible choices.&quot; Plurality voting, in which each voter selects one canidate, is vulnerable to a third party spoiler (Nader) or with many canidates can lead to the (near) election of a candidate most voters despise (le Pen). Some alternative voting systems include instant runoff where canidates are ranked by voters, a Borda count where voters assigns points to each canidate, or approval system where voters vote for as many canidates as they like. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.argmax.com/mt_blog/&quot;&gt;argmax.com&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21390</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:27:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ballots</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>firstpastthepost</category>
		<category>pluralities</category>
		<category>runoffs</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21083/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbcommercial.com/archives/index.inn?loc=detail&amp;amp;doc=/2002/October/22-2390-NEWS1.TXT"&gt;Making Rehnquist Proud&lt;/a&gt; Just like Rehnquist and his earlier political service, Jim Crow is still hard at work.
&quot;Tim Hutchinson and the Republican Party have claimed that they want to reach out to African-American voters, but when election time comes they have nothing to offer but intimidation and harassment,&quot; Cook said. &quot;We ask Tim Hutchinson and his party to stop disenfranchising African-American voters and obstructing the democratic process.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21083</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>africanamerican</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>jimcrow</category>
		<category>rehnquist</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10569/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/cgi-free/getstory_ssf.cgi?o1597_BC_WA--WashingtonPrimary&amp;amp;&amp;amp;news&amp;amp;newsflash-oregon"&gt;Patriotic Voting?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Granted, this is in Seattle, not New York, but here&apos;s the bit I found interesting: Voter participation is expected to jump all the way up to &lt;b&gt;almost 35%&lt;/b&gt; because of what this article calls &quot;patriotic fervor.&quot; Call me a cynic, but I can&apos;t help but think that when it comes to citizenship, most of us would still rather just chant &apos;USA! USA!&apos; at a ball game. Comments?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10569</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:30:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>patriotic</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>seattle</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4212/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vortex.com/privacy/priv.09.24"&gt;ELECTION: A note of sanity on voting systems&lt;/a&gt; from Lauren Weinstein&apos;s well-worth reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/privacy/&quot;&gt;Privacy Digest&lt;/a&gt;; it notes the inherent weak spots in all voting tally systems, and compares manual to machine and electronic ones.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4212</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:15:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>lauraweinstein</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>votes</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3902/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/opinion.pat,opinion/3774dde2.a26,.html"&gt;A better way to select party candidates.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Instead of holding silly primaries that end up picking the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.algore.com&quot;&gt;worst&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgebush.com&quot;&gt;possible&lt;/a&gt; candidates from each party, why not have party leaders pick the best 3-4 candidates and then have registered party members vote (by mail or at the convention) and announce the winner in August? [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3902</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>primaries</category>
		<category>voterreform</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/926/</link>
		<description> I hope all the Californians that are reading this today have voted. There&apos;s a great site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calvoter.org/&quot;&gt;CalVoter.org&lt;/a&gt; that features &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calvoter.org/2000/primary/propositions/topten.html&quot;&gt;a page listing all the top financial backers of the propositions&lt;/a&gt;. There are some curious contributors in there, like why are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calvoter.org/2000/primary/propositions/topten.html#21&quot;&gt;oil companies and public utilities behind&lt;/a&gt; the &quot;try gang kids as adults and put them in real prisions&quot; prop? There&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calvoter.org/2000/primary/propositions/topten.html#22&quot;&gt;a few dot com millionaires&lt;/a&gt; on the No on 22 campaign, and obviously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calvoter.org/2000/primary/propositions/topten.html#28&quot;&gt;a lot of tobacco companies&lt;/a&gt; want to see the cigarette tax repealed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.926</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2000 11:04:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>issues</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


