MetaFilter posts tagged with w3c and standards

Standards fail.

jaduncan — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:26:12 -0800

Only 4.3% of the web validates. Opera have finished a scan and validation check of the net using their new MAMA spider and have got an extremely interesting dataset. Did you check your website today?

W3C members' sites put to the test.

riffola — Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:16:42 -0800

State of Validation 2003. Off the 430 W3C members, only 28 (6.5%) have sites that validate with the W3C validator as either HTML or XHTML! This represents an increase in standards compliance of 75.7% from the year ago tests. [via the big orange Z]

riffola — Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:32:09 -0800

State of the Validation 2002. Off the 506 W3C members, only 18 (3.6%) have sites that validate with the W3C validator as either HTML or XHTML! 141 members' sites have definite markup errors. 342 members' sites don't even include the DTD, therefore they can not be tested. [via the big orange Z.]

bragadocchio — Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:42:18 -0800

W3C and Fee-based Standards for the Web The last call review period is over today. If you have an opinion that needs to be heard by the W3C, get it to them now. At last check, they had received 396 comments. What's your take on the proposed policy change? Will the W3C survive?