<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with w3c</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/w3c</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'w3c' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:26:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:26:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Standards fail.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75693/Standards%2Dfail</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-markup-validation-report/"&gt;Only 4.3% of the web validates.&lt;/a&gt; Opera have finished a scan and validation check of the net using their new &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama/&quot;&gt;MAMA&lt;/a&gt; spider and have got an &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-key-findings/&quot;&gt;extremely interesting dataset&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://validator.w3.org/&quot;&gt;Did you check your website today&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75693</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:26:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fail</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>mama</category>
		<category>opera</category>
		<category>standards</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<category>xhtml</category>
		<dc:creator>jaduncan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pentagon sets its sights on social networking websites</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52193/Pentagon%2Dsets%2Dits%2Dsights%2Don%2Dsocial%2Dnetworking%2Dwebsites</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025556.200?DCMP=NLC-nletter&amp;amp;nsref=mg19025556.200"&gt;Pentagon sets its sights on social networking websites&lt;/a&gt; From the fine folks that brought you the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office#Introduction&quot; /a&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Total&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;em&gt;Terrorism&lt;/em&gt; Information Awareness&lt;/a&gt; program, another wickedly-named branch of the NSA, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARDA&quot;&gt;Disruptive Technologies Office&lt;/a&gt; (formerly ARDA), is funding research into the usefulness of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_web&quot;&gt;Semantic Web&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; for combing through and profiling the 80 million members of MySpace.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52193</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ARDA</category>
		<category>DTO</category>
		<category>IAO</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>RDF</category>
		<category>TIA</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<category>XML</category>
		<dc:creator>bukharin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Newspaper xhtml redesign</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34722/Newspaper%2Dxhtml%2Dredesign</link>
		<description> When &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/explanation.html&quot;&gt;Wired News redesigned&lt;/a&gt; as nearly standards compliant xhtml in fall of 2002, it was cause for a great deal of celebration. Since then other prominent sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://espn.go.com/&quot;&gt;ESPN&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pga.com/&quot;&gt;PGA&lt;/a&gt; have jumped on the standards bandwagon, as have countless personal sites. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfexaminer.com/&quot;&gt;Today the SF Examiner launched a new site design&lt;/a&gt; which does &lt;a href=&quot;http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&amp;uri=http%3A//www.sfexaminer.com/home/&quot;&gt;validate as xhtml&lt;/a&gt;. More interesting to me are their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfexaminer.com/news/&quot;&gt;category archives&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfexaminer.com/archive/browsebydate/&quot;&gt;date archives&lt;/a&gt;, which mimic a weblog&apos;s simple and useful layout. Heck, I even love &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfexaminer.com/article/index.cfm/i/073004n_art&quot;&gt;the story pages&lt;/a&gt; which feature large leaded text (space between lines - the amount of &quot;double spaceness&quot;) which is also blog-like, and makes for comfortable reading. As far as I know, SF Examiner is the first, but will this start a new wave of bandwidth-saving, well-designed newspaper redesigns? [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.veen.com/jeff/&quot;&gt;veen&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34722</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:36:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<category>xhtml</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>W3C members&apos; sites put to the test.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23852/W3C%2Dmembers%2Dsites%2Dput%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dtest</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.markokarppinen.com/20030224.html"&gt;State of Validation 2003.&lt;/a&gt; Off the 430 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List/&quot;&gt;W3C members&lt;/a&gt;, only 28 (6.5%) have sites that validate with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://validator.w3.org/&quot;&gt;W3C validator&lt;/a&gt; as either HTML or XHTML! This represents an increase in standards compliance of 75.7% from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/15007&quot;&gt;year ago tests&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[via the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeldman.com/daily/0203b.shtml#dogfood&quot;&gt;big orange Z&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23852</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:16:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Consortium</category>
		<category>HTML</category>
		<category>Standards</category>
		<category>Validation</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<category>Web</category>
		<category>Wide</category>
		<category>World</category>
		<category>XHTML</category>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Unofficial competition to redesign w3c.org</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22778/Unofficial%2Dcompetition%2Dto%2Dredesign%2Dw3corg</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://w3mix.web-graphics.com/"&gt;Unofficial competition to redesign w3c.org.&lt;/a&gt; In early December last year the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3c.org&quot;&gt;w3c.org homepage&lt;/a&gt; released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/News/2002#item208&quot;&gt;a redesign&lt;/a&gt; using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2002/11/homepage&quot;&gt;XHTML and CSS&lt;/a&gt;. While everyone appreciated the cleaner use of markup &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.k10k.net/newspost.aspx?id=7842&quot;&gt;the response was wholly underwhelming&lt;/a&gt; and most felt the design did a disservice to CSS. &amp;nbsp; ...hence the competition, duh.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22778</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:20:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<dc:creator>holloway</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15007/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://homepage.mac.com/marko/20020222.html"&gt;State of the Validation 2002.&lt;/a&gt; Off the 506 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List/&quot;&gt;W3C members&lt;/a&gt;, only 18 (3.6%) have sites that validate with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://validator.w3.org/&quot;&gt;W3C validator&lt;/a&gt; as either HTML or XHTML! 141 members&apos; sites have definite markup errors. 342 members&apos; sites don&apos;t even include the DTD, therefore they can not be tested. &lt;small&gt;[via the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeldman.com/daily/0202c.html#ala138&quot;&gt;big orange Z&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15007</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:32:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>doctype</category>
		<category>DTD</category>
		<category>standards</category>
		<category>Validation</category>
		<category>validator</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11005/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-patent-policy-20010816/"&gt;The W3C&apos;s RAND Patent Policy&lt;/a&gt; commenting deadline has been extended.  At first glance, the new policies seem to encourage software patents, but after reading the whole thing and the W3C&apos;s response to current comments, it looks, to my admittedly naive eyes, as though the W3C is trying to make it so that companies using proprietary software are going to &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to make it available to other people for licensing.  Why is this new structure potentially a bad thing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11005</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2001 06:30:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>licensing</category>
		<category>patent</category>
		<category>patents</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>W3</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<dc:creator>cCranium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10956/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.openphd.net/W3C_Patent_Policy/"&gt;W3C and Fee-based Standards for the Web &lt;/a&gt; The last call review period is over today.  If you have an opinion that needs to be heard by the W3C, get it to them now.  At last check, they had received &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/&quot;&gt;396 comments&lt;/a&gt;.  What&apos;s your take on the proposed policy change?  Will the W3C survive?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10956</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>standards</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<category>webstandards</category>
		<dc:creator>bragadocchio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9081/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.techreview.com/web/mcdonald/mcdonald071601.asp"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Third Voice&lt;/i&gt; may be gone but that ability will rise again,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;u&gt;this&lt;/u&gt; time it&apos;s going to be open source. How soon before I can subscribe to the &lt;i&gt;Winerlog&lt;/i&gt; RDF stream annotating &lt;i&gt;Scripting News&lt;/i&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9081</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:01:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amaya</category>
		<category>annotation</category>
		<category>Annotea</category>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>RDF</category>
		<category>ThirdVoice</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<category>webhistory</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7766/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/Talks/C5_17_May_91.html"&gt;The web is ten years old today!&lt;/a&gt; So how has it impacted our lives over the past decade? I&apos;ll point out that I am not working in a coffee shop to pay for my failing acting career. So there is one benefit right there (I make a lousy waiter than I do an actor). How has the web changed you life over the last decade? How has it changed society? Or just post your birthday wishes.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7766</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2001 11:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anniversary</category>
		<category>birthday</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>W3</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>captaincursor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5816/</link>
		<description> The W3C opens a can of whoopass on the browser manufacturers with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206&quot;&gt;this detailed list of bugs they&apos;d like to see remedied&lt;/a&gt;. Will this result in any changes whatsoever, or will Microsoft and Netscape continue to ignore what they &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be doing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5816</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:36:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


