<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with waragainstdrugs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/waragainstdrugs</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'waragainstdrugs' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:13:58 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:13:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ashcroft makes baby Madison cry.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28300/Ashcroft%2Dmakes%2Dbaby%2DMadison%2Dcry</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/09/14/patriot/"&gt;Methamphetamine is now a WMD.&lt;/a&gt; Well, I guess we should&apos;ve seen it coming.  According to this Salon article, prosecutors across the country are now using the Patriot act to prosecute drug crimes, fraud, and anything involving a bomb.  This means any of these people may be detained indefinitely without an attorney.  I don&apos;t like trailing questions, but I would like to see some constructive and creative posts about what can be done to protest this.  It&apos;s so blatantly unconstitutional, it&apos;s not funny anymore, and I for one am not willing to welcome our new overlords.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28300</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:13:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>habeascorpus</category>
		<category>johnashcroft</category>
		<category>meth</category>
		<category>methamphetamine</category>
		<category>patriotact</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>waragainstdrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>condour75</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17753/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://economist.com/world/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1168010"&gt;Speaking frankly about drugs,&lt;/a&gt; the Economist all but concludes the war against some drugs&apos; success a failure in the UK, saying that: &quot;These &lt;a href=&quot;http://economist.com/images/20020608/CBR082.gif&quot;&gt;figures&lt;/a&gt; confirm that the increasing resources employed to disrupt the illegal drugs trade are having little impact.&quot; Considering the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjcj.org/fedgrows.html&quot;&gt;present path&lt;/a&gt; is not working and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0122/kick.php&quot;&gt;broad swaths&lt;/a&gt; of the public (from across the political spectrum!&#8212;excepting the tobacco, alcohol, cotton and drug dealer lobby of course :) aren&apos;t against decriminalization, then why can&apos;t I have my &lt;a href=&quot;http://husted.com/hgsf/Bay_Gold.htm&quot;&gt;Bay Golds?&lt;/a&gt; Besides, the pharmaceutical industry has a stellar record of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/data.exe/blscu/cusr0000sema:dpan12&quot;&gt;raising prices :)&lt;/a&gt; Who knows, &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=^drg&amp;d=c&amp;t=1y&quot;&gt;they may want in!&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17753</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:40:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>unitedkingdom</category>
		<category>waragainstdrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17232/</link>
		<description> Drug War Roundup III A 70% increase in the price of cigarettes seems to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;ncid=716&amp;e=19&amp;cid=676&amp;u=/usatoday/20020517/ts_usatoday/4121191&quot;&gt;dropped&lt;/a&gt; the teenage smoking rate by 7%. On May 15 you heard the Drug War Czar say anti-drug ads were a &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/GoodMorningAmerica/GMA020515Drug_czar.html&quot;&gt;flop&lt;/a&gt;. He announced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediacampaign.org/newsroom/press02/051602.html&quot;&gt;new campaign&lt;/a&gt;  the next day. San Franciscan test subjects in a medical marijuana study say they&apos;re given &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bayarea.com/mld/bayarea/news/local/3259626.htm&quot;&gt;low-potency ditch weed&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Subjects in a similiar study in Canada say the weed they&apos;re given is way &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/ottawa/news/story.asp?id={D439B4D4-31E9-4338-A605-27B311644C41}&quot;&gt;too good&lt;/a&gt;. Lastly, Canada is debating whether to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/national/globalnational/story.asp?id=A75EC010-5378-4E0A-8631-84C7CA9DC948&quot;&gt;decriminalize&lt;/a&gt; smoking pot on the heels of a committee conclusion that it doesn&apos;t lead to hard drug use, committing more crimes or driving fast.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17232</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2002 15:18:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antidrugadvertising</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>cigarettes</category>
		<category>decriminalization</category>
		<category>ditchweed</category>
		<category>drugczar</category>
		<category>drugwarroundup</category>
		<category>harddrugs</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>medicalmarijuana</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<category>sanfrancisco</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<category>teenagers</category>
		<category>teens</category>
		<category>waragainstdrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


