<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with warcrime</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/warcrime</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'warcrime' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:47:33 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:47:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Boris Johnson - War criminal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72757/Boris%2DJohnson%2DWar%2Dcriminal</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/06/24/do2401.xml&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;the circumstances in which I came by this object were so morally ambiguous that I cannot quite think of it as theft.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;  Boris Johnson, mayor of London, a war criminal?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72757</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>borisjohnson</category>
		<category>defencesIdliketoseeusedmoreoftenincourt</category>
		<category>london</category>
		<category>mayoroflondon</category>
		<category>warcrime</category>
		<dc:creator>patricio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Roll call vote at Nuremburg?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54819/Roll%2Dcall%2Dvote%2Dat%2DNuremburg</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;Members of Congress are thus on notice that minimum due process guarantees under customary international law must not be denied when Congress attempts to articulate what forms of procedure a military commission should adopt.... Such denials are war crimes. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/09/plea-to-congress-on-military.php&quot;&gt;Can a vote be a war crime?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54819</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:24:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>GenevaConventions</category>
		<category>Newsfilter</category>
		<category>WarCrime</category>
		<dc:creator>orthogonality</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The UN Detention Unit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48134/The%2DUN%2DDetention%2DUnit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2133918/entry/2133919/"&gt;How is life&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.un.org/icty/cases-e/index-e.htm&quot;&gt;accused war criminals&lt;/a&gt; (see e.g. drag-down list at top) awaiting trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia? Stimulating if they enjoy chess or model ships, according to this brief Slate dispatch. How well do such alleged monsters need to be accommodated?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48134</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:55:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>icty</category>
		<category>nicedigs</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>un</category>
		<category>undu</category>
		<category>warcrime</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US war crimes again</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45997/US%2Dwar%2Dcrimes%2Dagain</link>
		<description> Looks like George W Bush&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hrw.org/press/2002/08/aspa080302.htm&quot;&gt;Hague Invasion Act&lt;/a&gt; might need amending to become a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4357684.stm&quot;&gt;Madrid Invasion Act&lt;/a&gt;, following a Spanish court order for the arrest of three US soldiers in response to the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpj.org/Briefings/2003/palestine_hotel/palestine_hotel.html&quot;&gt;Palestine Hotel&quot; incident&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[newsfilter]&lt;/small&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45997</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:32:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internationalrelations</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>spain</category>
		<category>warcrime</category>
		<dc:creator>wilful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How Good Was The Good War ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41914/How%2DGood%2DWas%2DThe%2DGood%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;Five years ago, Robert Lilly, a distinguished American sociologist, prepared a book based on military archives. Taken by Force is a study of the rapes committed by American soldiers in Europe between 1942 and 1945. He submitted his manuscript in 2001. But after September 11, its US publisher suppressed it, and it first appeared in 2003 in a French translation. We know from Anthony Beevor about the sexual violence unleashed by the Red Army, but we prefer not to know about mass rape committed by American and British troops. Lilly suggests a minimum of 10,000 American rapes. Contemporaries described a much wider scale of unpunished sex crime. Time Magazine reported in September 1945: &quot;Our own army and the British army along with ours have done their share of looting and raping ... we too are considered an army of rapists.&quot;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;br&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5189998-107865,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Our democratic imperialism prefers to forget that fascism had important Anglo-American roots. Hitler&apos;s dream was inspired, in part, by the British Empire. In eastern Europe, the Nazis hoped to make their America and Australia, where ethnic cleansing and slave labour created a frontier for settlement. In western Europe, they sought their India from which revenues, labour and soldiers might be extracted. American imperialism in Latin America gave explicit precedents for Germany&apos;s and Japan&apos;s claims of supremacy in their neighbouring regions. The British and Americans were key theorists of eugenics and had made racial segregation respectable. The concentration camp was a British invention, and in Iraq and Afghanistan the British were the first to use air power to repress partisan resistance. The Luftwaffe - in its assault on Guernica, and later London and Coventry - paid homage to Bomber Harris&apos;s terror bombing of the Kurds in the 1920s.&quot;&gt;An Ethical Blank Cheque&lt;/a&gt;... So, 
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2005/05/08/how_good_was_the_good_war?mode=PF&quot; title=&quot;It&#8217;s true that only the British, along with their Commonwealth and Empire, took part in the war from its start in September 1939 to its end in August 1945; true too that British defiance of Hitler in the year from June 1940 to June 1941 was absolutely crucial. But the British, as they knew even at the time, could only play a negative part by not surrendering. They could not defeat Hitler on their own, but had to wait for him to bring about his own doom, by invading Russia in June 1941 and declaring war on the United States (rather than the other way round, be it remembered) in December. Even then, others did the fighting. The best description of how Hitler was defeated was Stalin&#8217;s. The old monster said that England provided the time, America provided the money, and Russia provided the blood. Not only did it take the Western Allies nearly three years after the German attack on Russia seriously to engage the German army in Normandy, but even then most of the fighting was still on the other side of Europe. In the campaign from D-Day to V-E Day, something like 110,000 American soldiers were killed, as well as about half as many from the combined British-Canadian armies. That sounds formidable, and indeed is by today&#8217;s standards, until you remember that in the same 11-month period more than half a million Russians were killed on the Eastern Front. Leaving aside the respective Allied casualties, to see how the war was won you need only compare two figures. In all the western campaigns of the war against French, British, Americans, and troops of many other lands, some 200,000 German soldiers died. Four million Germans died on the Eastern Front.&quot;&gt;How Good Was The Good War ?&lt;/a&gt; And from the Eastern Front: &lt;a href=&quot;http://context.themoscowtimes.com/print.php?aid=142173&quot; title=&quot;We returned home after nine months. Everything was burned down, destroyed, but our house was spared. I don&apos;t remember exactly, but sometime around the winter of 1944, two German prisoners came by -- they sometimes let them out of the camp to ask for handouts. Vitya started to shout at them in German, and Mother said, &apos;What are you shouting for? Maybe our father is also wandering around like them.&apos; She went into the cellar and gave them two potatoes, even though we ourselves lived from hand to mouth. My brother continued to swear, and Mama calmed him down, saying, &apos;Ah, son, they also live somewhere.&apos; Maybe those two got home thanks to women like our Mama.&quot;&gt;Uncensored Memories&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;small&gt;From Alfredo Perez&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicaltheory.info/&quot; title=&quot;The Political Theory Daily Review is a portal weblog on political theory and philosophy, and is updated every weekday. Our aim is to provide a central space on the Web where our visitors can save time in staying on top of the news. We link to articles and essays that can be read free of charge and that are relevant to the field of political theory, broadly conceived to cover a wide range of subjects, perspectives, and methodologies.&quot;&gt;Political Theory Daily Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41914</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 08:59:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>sexualaggression</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>warcrime</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A War Crime or an Act of War?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23220/A%2DWar%2DCrime%2Dor%2Dan%2DAct%2Dof%2DWar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/31/opinion/31PELL.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position=top"&gt;A War Crime or an Act of War?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the truth is, all we know for certain is that Kurds were bombarded with poison gas that day at Halabja. We cannot say with any certainty that Iraqi chemical weapons killed the Kurds. This is not the only distortion in the Halabja story. ..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This much about the gassing at Halabja we undoubtedly know: it came about in the course of a battle between Iraqis and Iranians. Iraq used chemical weapons to try to kill Iranians who had seized the town, which is in northern Iraq not far from the Iranian border. The Kurdish civilians who died had the misfortune to be caught up in that exchange. But they were not Iraq&apos;s main target. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
 And the story gets murkier: immediately after the battle the United States Defense Intelligence Agency investigated and produced a classified report, which it circulated within the intelligence community on a need-to-know basis. That study asserted that it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds, not Iraqi gas. (NYT)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23220</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:43:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ChemicalWeapons</category>
		<category>Halabja</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Kurds</category>
		<category>UnitedStates</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>WarCrime</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


