<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with washingtonpost and war</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/washingtonpost+war</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'washingtonpost' and 'war' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:58:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:58:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Stop Loss Orders: It&apos;s not your President&apos;s National Guard...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30470/Stop%2DLoss%2DOrders%2DIts%2Dnot%2Dyour%2DPresidents%2DNational%2DGuard</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A36979-2003Dec28?language=printer&quot; title=&gt;Army Stops Many Soldiers From Quitting&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;According to their contracts, expectations and desires, all three soldiers should have been civilians by now. But Fontaine and Costas are currently serving in Iraq, and Eagle has just been deployed. On their Army paychecks, the expiration date of their military service is now listed sometime after 2030 -- the payroll computer&apos;s way of saying, &quot;Who knows?&quot;

The three are among thousands of soldiers forbidden to leave military service under the Army&apos;s &quot;stop-loss&quot; orders, intended to stanch the seepage of troops, through retirement and discharge, from a military stretched thin by its burgeoning overseas missions.&lt;/em&gt;

As Helena Cobham &lt;a href=&quot;http://justworldnews.org/archives/000402.html&quot; title=&quot;The draft that dares not speak its name&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;They don&apos;t want to call it a draft but it sure ain&apos;t your father&apos;s &quot;all-volunteer military&quot; any more...&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://acrossriver.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Marine&apos;s Girl&lt;/a&gt;, Cobham&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://justworldnews.org/archives/000358.html&quot; title=&quot;Marine&apos;s Girl being silenced-- or not? Folks-- Marine&apos;s Girl, who has been writing a great blog for the past 5-plus weeks that provides &apos;&apos;Insight on being the girl friend of a Marine in Iraq. Opinions of news items of the day, politics, and relationships&apos;&apos; is being... &quot;&gt;cause&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://justworldnews.org/archives/000367.html&quot; title=&quot;Marine&apos;s Girl : new format - She&apos;s back! If you&apos;ve missed Marine&apos;s Girl and her wonderful, fresh writing; and if you followed her harrowing story of how some random and mean-spirited old cyber-harrasser guy intimidated her into slamming the door shut on most of her great earlier content-- then you should hurry on over to Across the River, the new group blog that she&apos;s started up with a couple of friends.&quot;&gt;celebre&lt;/a&gt; of some time ago, writes about stop-loss &lt;a href=&quot;http://acrossriver.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_acrossriver_archive.html#107155793050808282&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;He has a promotion coming based on his service in Iraq so I&apos;m very proud of that. A new rank! He didn&apos;t re-enlist which was my greatest fear. I can deal with unit stop-loss as that can be lifted anytime, its the re-enlistment that I did NOT want to deal with.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://acrossriver.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_acrossriver_archive.html#107190301743904661&quot; title=&quot;When he heard my voice he started crying and I cried with him, we got it worked out but he was stubborn and had this worked out in his head that it was the best for me. So formal he was on ICQ, not his normal self but after we cried on the phone...he melted back down to normal. Come to find out, he said the counselor suggested this &apos;&apos;not dragging me along anymore&apos;&apos; might be best. I asked him if they have been after him to re-enlist again, he said they had been offering him alot of things but he told them he had a better offer from me, as we planned to marry and be a family. Now a lightbulb went off for me...what are the chances they would want me out of the way then so he would re-enlist? He just got a promotion so the pressure is on again as they can&apos;t hold him forever on stop-loss but seems like they are sure trying.&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. See also&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,36%257E53%257E1860164,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Amid ongoing conflicts in Iraq and elsewhere, the U.S. Army Reserve is starting to have trouble hanging on to citizen soldiers.&quot;&gt; Army reservists choosing to be citizens, not soldiers&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30470</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:58:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>ArmyReserves</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>HelenaCobham</category>
		<category>JustWorldNews</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>NationalGuard</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>StopLoss</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Media Map of Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24888/Media%2DMap%2Dof%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://poynterextra.org/map/deploy.html"&gt;Media Map of Iraq&lt;/a&gt; (Requires Flash 6.)  Click on a location or unit to see a list of embedded reporters.  Then each reporter&apos;s name is a link to a list of their war reporting either at their website or via a Google News search.  Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=27077&quot;&gt;Poynter.org is constantly looking to improve this map&lt;/a&gt; via reader input, as the Pentagon is not giving up much information on the embedment program.  Also, The Atlantic Monthly/Washington Post&apos;s Michael Kelly is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27396-2003Apr4.html&quot;&gt;first embedded reporter to be killed &lt;/a&gt;in this war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24888</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:43:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>embedded</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>map</category>
		<category>Poynter</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>pitchblende</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>ABC&apos;s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24189/ABCs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/TheNote.html"&gt;ABC&apos;s blog &quot;The Note&quot; suspends operations,&lt;/a&gt; citing lack of resources needed for war coverage, the blog&apos;s humorous style not being &quot;the right national tonic,&quot; and this shocker: &quot;We suspect that the amount of strictly political news &#8212; the kind of stuff that is the meat and starch of The Note &#8212; is likely to dramatically decrease in the coming days.&quot; &lt;b&gt;GUH?&lt;/b&gt; Aren&apos;t blogs now more important than ever? Aren&apos;t &lt;i&gt;politics&lt;/i&gt; now more important than ever? What message is being sent by the mainstream media here? (Via the indispensable &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7602-2003Mar10.html&quot;&gt;Lloyd Grove&lt;/a&gt; of the Washington Post.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24189</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:00:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABC</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>TheNote</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19861/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59403-2002Sep9.html"&gt;U.S. Stops Iraq-Al Qaeda Talk&lt;/a&gt; From the Washington Post. Beyond the superficial significance of administration back-tracking, in regards to intelligence there seems to be two key aspects to this story: 1) The article talks about how the CIA was unable to &quot;validate two prominent allegations made by high-ranking administration officials,&quot; implying that Bush/Cheney/etc. have been making baseless assumptions about Iraq in their pro-war arguments, and 2) it brings into question whether we know anything at all about Iraq, anyway. What if the same can be said of Hussein&apos;s nuclear plans?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19861</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>misinformation</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15240/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33286-2002Mar3.html"&gt;Not to complain about the ever-expanding war on terror, but...&lt;/a&gt; Afganistan just might become a little stickier than our leaders had hoped. A recent raid on regrouping troops went not too well, with a combined force of Afgan and U.S. troops beating a quick retreat. Is the U.S. miring itself in not one but several Vietnam&apos;s?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15240</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2002 23:18:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WarOnTerror</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11066/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50524-2001Sep30.html"&gt;On September 30th, there was a peace protest in Washington D.C.&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m surprised no one else linked to this -- about 50 students from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bard.edu&quot;&gt;my college&lt;/a&gt; attended and joined the crowd of a few thousand. I would have gone, but I&apos;m dubious about the efficacy of public protest despite the fact that I&apos;m an affirmed pacifist. What do you folks think? Will a totally non-military action be an appropriate response? (And is there any possiblity of the US acting in such a way?) Is the loss of a single additional human life in this new war justifiable?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11066</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 11:28:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>anti-war</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DC</category>
		<category>pacifism</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>post911</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WarOnTerror</category>
		<category>Washington</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>tweebiscuit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10288/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/corp-focus/2001/000085.html"&gt;Another thoughtful article&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Open the Washington Post to it&apos;s editorial pages, and war talk dominates:&lt;br&gt;
Henry Kissinger: Destroy the Network.&lt;br&gt;
Robert Kagan: We Must Fight This War.&lt;br&gt;
Charles Krauthammer: To War, Not to Court.&lt;br&gt;
William S. Cohen: American Holy War.&lt;br&gt;
There is no column by Colman McCarthy talking peace.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10288</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>mapalm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


