<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with weaponry</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/weaponry</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'weaponry' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:45:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:45:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>USA! USA!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66694/USA%2DUSA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/guns/recoilless-auto-shotgun-fires-300-rounds-per-minute-no-cleaning-or-lube-required-324453.php?autoplay=true"&gt;Recoil free &quot;automatic shotgun&quot; fires 300 rounds per minute.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66694</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:45:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awesome</category>
		<category>beavis</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>shotguns</category>
		<category>videogames</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Remember: short, controlled bursts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61754/Remember%2Dshort%2Dcontrolled%2Dbursts</link>
		<description> If you ever wanted to have an actual working M41-A Pulse Rifle (the preferred weapon of the Colonial Marines in the 1986 Documentary &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/&quot;&gt;Aliens&lt;/a&gt;), then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tk560.com/m41a.html&quot;&gt;today is your lucky day&lt;/a&gt;.  Many more sci-fi prop replica guides can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tk560.com/howtoguides.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61754</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:07:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aliens</category>
		<category>props</category>
		<category>replicas</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It sounds a lot like science fiction.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43421/It%2Dsounds%2Da%2Dlot%2Dlike%2Dscience%2Dfiction</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68152,00.html?tw=wn_7techhead"&gt;It sounds a lot like science fiction.&lt;/a&gt; It moves at the speed of light and it can penetrate walls. The U.S. military has firepower that uses electromagnetic energy to blind, stun or kill targets. Defense contractors are eager, but the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001229.html&quot;&gt;weapons&lt;/a&gt; are not yet being deployed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43421</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 05:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>electromagnetic</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>microwave</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>dsquid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MTV Meets Military History Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37397/MTV%2DMeets%2DMilitary%2DHistory%2DChannel</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.grouchymedia.com/index.cfm"&gt;You got your Outkast in my Sun Tzu&lt;/a&gt; Weaponry, military, and war footage set to music.  Although the author &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grouchymedia.com/other_videos/american_heroes/index.cfm&quot;&gt;believes&lt;/a&gt; Enya did the song Adiemus, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grouchymedia.com/other_videos/woohoo/index.cfm&quot;&gt;target practice&lt;/a&gt; video is kind of interesting.  I couldn&apos;t find any videos set to Peace Train, however.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37397</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:34:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conflict</category>
		<category>firearms</category>
		<category>guns</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>joaquim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gamma-ray weapons could trigger next arms race</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27651/Gammaray%2Dweapons%2Dcould%2Dtrigger%2Dnext%2Darms%2Drace</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994049"&gt;Gamma-ray weapons could trigger next arms race&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The hafnium explosive could be extremely powerful. One gram of fully charged hafnium isomer could store more energy than 50 kilograms of TNT. Miniature missiles could be made with warheads that are far more powerful than existing conventional weapons, giving massively enhanced firepower to the armed forces using them.&quot;

Half of me thinks: &quot;WOW! Cool!&quot;
The other 1% thinks: &quot;We&apos;ve really had it now&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27651</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 02:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arms</category>
		<category>gammaray</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>hmgovt</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Patriot Missiles shooting down our side</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24867/Patriot%2DMissiles%2Dshooting%2Ddown%2Dour%2Dside</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/04/wjet04.xml&amp;amp;sSheet=/news/2003/04/04/ixnewstop.html"&gt;US fighter shot down by Patriot missile&lt;/a&gt; The Patriot Missiles that are supposed to be the protector of American forces are living up to their reputation. So far, one just  shot down an F-18, and previously took out a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$BUA0PUBD5CBGXQFIQMGCFF4AVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2003/03/24/wraf24.xml&quot;&gt;RAF Tornado&lt;/a&gt;, killing two people. Another one locked onto an F-16, but the quick-thinking pilot blew up the Patriot missile battery&apos;s radar dish with a HARM missile. These &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2080615&quot;&gt;missiles didn&apos;t work&lt;/a&gt; in the last gulf war, and are continuing to follow that trend. The locking onto allied planes seems to indicate a bug in the IFF routines of the Patriots. Not very patriotic of it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24867</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 20:38:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABM</category>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>ballisticmissiles</category>
		<category>defence</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>fighters</category>
		<category>friendlyfire</category>
		<category>materiel</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>patriotmissiles</category>
		<category>patriots</category>
		<category>warplanes</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Xoc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>F-22 Raptor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22443/F22%2DRaptor</link>
		<description> The F-22 Raptor is the next generation fighter for the United States. At nearly 97 million each, it will be deployed in 2004.This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-22.htm&quot;&gt;site&lt;/a&gt; gives a remarkably detailed report regarding its design and function. Including such gems as &quot;first-look, first-shot, first-kill capability&quot; and &quot; Humans are good differentiators, but they are poor integrators.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22443</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:19:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aircraft</category>
		<category>airforce</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>f22</category>
		<category>f-22</category>
		<category>planes</category>
		<category>raptor</category>
		<category>warplanes</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>JohnR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19911/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fas.org/asmp/library/asm/asm48.html"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/asmp/library/asm/asm48.html&quot;&gt;the most recent issue of the Arms Sales Monitor&lt;/a&gt;, the Arms Sales Monitoring Project finds that the War on Terror has provided the U.S. military with an excuse to begin arming regimes that had previously been blacklisted for human rights abuses, weapons proliferation, or brutal conflict&quot;&lt;/i&gt; - Federation of American Scientists.

The content of this document gives rise to a range of issues. Can arming new friends with advanced weaponry strengthen the long-term security of the U.S, or will this ultimately ensure renewed hostility arising from an apparent readiness to take sides in foreign conflicts?? One year on from 9/11/01, has the moral high-ground implied by the &apos;War Against Terrorism&apos; been fatally eroded by turning a blind eye to the questionable ethics of &apos;friendly&apos; states (the records of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/saudi/&quot;&gt;Saudis&lt;/a&gt;, and arguably, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.btselem.org/&quot;&gt;Israelis&lt;/a&gt; and others, may also be a case in point)?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19911</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 05:50:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>armssales</category>
		<category>blacklisted</category>
		<category>hostility</category>
		<category>israelis</category>
		<category>regimes</category>
		<category>saudis</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<dc:creator>Doozer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11080/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/03/alexander.cnna/index.html"&gt;The G-Rated War: Blowing Smoke, Pipe Dream, or The Real Hashish?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I want to spin antiwar arguments a slightly different way. Previous threads have been quite dim. This Cnn chat transcript focuses on the use of non-lethal weapons, the need to separate innocents from terrorists and separate terrorist networks from Islamic states, and the interviewee is as much as suit as they come. You could cut a diamond on that crew cut. I have several questions: 1) Is the US military actually going to use non-lethal weapons, or is this the new &quot;smart bomb?&quot; 2) Do the &apos;pacificists&apos; among us consider this to be pacificist? 3) If you do favor peace over war, do you think this is a good compromise between peace and war, or is the issue by definition binary? More &gt; &gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11080</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>nonlethal</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


