<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with weapons and airplanes</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/weapons+airplanes</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'weapons' and 'airplanes' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:19:25 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:19:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>F-22 Raptor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22443/F22%2DRaptor</link>
		<description> The F-22 Raptor is the next generation fighter for the United States. At nearly 97 million each, it will be deployed in 2004.This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-22.htm&quot;&gt;site&lt;/a&gt; gives a remarkably detailed report regarding its design and function. Including such gems as &quot;first-look, first-shot, first-kill capability&quot; and &quot; Humans are good differentiators, but they are poor integrators.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22443</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:19:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aircraft</category>
		<category>airforce</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>f22</category>
		<category>f-22</category>
		<category>planes</category>
		<category>raptor</category>
		<category>warplanes</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>JohnR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17522/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/2002question/fleischer.htm&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot;&gt;Questioning&lt;/a&gt; the myth of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid9.htm&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot;&gt;plastic knives and boxcutters&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;&quot;This fictoid serves to divert public attentions from the responsibility, and legal liability, of the government and airlines to prevent major weapons &#8212; such as guns, bombs, chemical sprays and hunting knives&lt;/i&gt; [all of which were mentioned in flight attendant and passenger cell phone calls] &lt;i&gt;from being carried aboard airplanes. If such illegal devices had been smuggled aboard the planes, the liability could amount to billions of dollars. If, on the other hand, it could be disseminated that the hijackers had only used plastic knives, such as those provided by the airlines for meals, or box cutters, which were allowed on planes, neither the airlines, the screeners at the airport, or the FAA, which regulates the safety of airports, could be held legally responsible.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17522</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 09:48:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airlines</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>airports</category>
		<category>contraband</category>
		<category>faa</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>fotzepolitic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13411/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://crisis.blogspot.com/2001_12_01_crisis_archive.html#8123551"&gt;The Solution?...Fly Naked&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; So you can sneak a bomb in your shoe. The only solution is to fly naked. You can&apos;t bring anything on board; it all has to be shipped separately on cargo jet. There has to be an air marshall on every flight -- no in plain clothes (because nobody&apos;s in clothes) but sitting in front of the cockpit, heavily armed and ready. It&apos;s getting that ridiculous. What can we do?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13411</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:33:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airlines</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>faa</category>
		<category>flight</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>riley370</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12101/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/flight.risk/weapons.html"&gt;This information is somewhat discomforting.&lt;/a&gt; I always imagined that there would be instances of people bringing something that could be considered on an airplane but I did not think that there would be this many.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12101</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:49:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airlines</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>tsa</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Stretch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10725/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.trnonline.com/stories/09222001/editorial_page_columnists/27201.shtml"&gt;the passengers on our planes should have the right to bear arms&lt;/a&gt; Is this guy, a former pilot, suggesting that we have a constitutional right to carry weapons aboard planes so we can defend ourselves? Is an uzzi ok or a bayonet?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10725</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:10:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>airlines</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>flight</category>
		<category>guns</category>
		<category>passengers</category>
		<category>travel</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


