<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with webaccessibility</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/webaccessibility</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'webaccessibility' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:29:46 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:29:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>NFB v. Target: Web Accessibility and business</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74449/NFB%2Dv%2DTarget%2DWeb%2DAccessibility%2Dand%2Dbusiness</link>
		<description> An important class action lawsuit was settled today when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D92QMVKO0.htm&quot;&gt;Target agreed to pay $6 million in damages&lt;/a&gt; to the plaintiffs (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nfb.org/&quot;&gt;National Federation of the Blind&lt;/a&gt;, et al.) because these disabled users could not shop on the Target.com site. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nfbtargetlawsuit.com/&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is a collection of legal &lt;strike&gt;mumbo jumbo&lt;/strike&gt; materials. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Content_Accessibility_Guidelines&quot;&gt;WCAG&lt;/a&gt; set authored by the W3C is barely used online (and 2.0 is controversial); &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.section508.gov/&quot;&gt;Section 508&lt;/a&gt; applies only to government-funded agencies and their websites; this class action lawsuit put to test the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990&quot;&gt;Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990&lt;/a&gt;, particularly Title III.

Some of the comments posted to various newspapers about the story were particularly enlightening: disabled people are lawsuit-happy whiny bastards; small business owners will be put out of business because making accessible sites is omg so expensive and hard; WWW usage is a privilege, not a right; and, naturally, arguments against the previously stated.

&lt;small&gt;The ADA doesn&apos;t specify &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; online stores should be made accessible, though, so business will have to rely on WCAG and maybe even tips from Section 508.&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74449</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:29:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>disabled</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>nationalfederationoftheblind</category>
		<category>target</category>
		<category>webaccessibility</category>
		<dc:creator>Ky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


