<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with webfilters</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/webfilters</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'webfilters' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:45:52 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:45:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>US v ALA</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26579/US%2Dv%2DALA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.findlaw.com/ap_stories/a/w/1154/6-23-2003/20030623080011_40.html"&gt;The Children&apos;s Internet Protection Act&lt;/a&gt; is hunky dory, &lt;a href=&quot;http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/23jun20030800/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-361.pdf&quot;&gt;according to the Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt;.  This means that public libraries are required by law to have web filters on public terminals.  

While it&apos;s great that children will now be forever protected from the evils on online pornography, the drawback is that most filters are so unreliable that just me mentioning the word &quot;sex&quot; in this post could get Metafilter blocked by a web filter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26579</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:45:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>libraries</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>webfilters</category>
		<dc:creator>zedzebedia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


